Literature DB >> 23266886

Contamination issues in a continuous ethanol production corn wet milling facility.

Esha Khullar1, Angela D Kent, Timothy D Leathers, Kenneth M Bischoff, Kent D Rausch, M E Tumbleson, Vijay Singh.   

Abstract

Low ethanol yields and poor yeast viability were investigated at a continuous ethanol production corn wet milling facility. Using starch slurries and recycle streams from a commercial ethanol facility, laboratory hydrolysates were prepared by reproducing starch liquefaction and saccharification steps in the laboratory. Fermentations with hydrolysates prepared in the laboratory were compared with plant hydrolysates for final ethanol concentrations and total yeast counts. Fermentation controls were prepared using hydrolysates (plant and laboratory) that were not inoculated with yeast. Hydrolysates prepared in the laboratory resulted in higher final ethanol concentrations (15.8 % v/v) than plant hydrolysate (13.4 % v/v). Uninoculated controls resulted in ethanol production from both laboratory (12.2 % v/v) and plant hydrolysates (13.7 % v/v), indicating the presence of a contaminating microorganism. Yeast colony counts on cycloheximide and virginiamycin plates confirmed the presence of a contaminant. DNA sequencing and fingerprinting studies also indicated a number of dissimilar communities in samples obtained from fermentors, coolers, saccharification tanks, and thin stillage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23266886     DOI: 10.1007/s11274-012-1244-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0959-3993            Impact factor:   3.312


  10 in total

1.  Within- and between-lake variability in the composition of bacterioplankton communities: investigations using multiple spatial scales.

Authors:  Anthony C Yannarell; Eric W Triplett
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Annual patterns in bacterioplankton community variability in a humic lake.

Authors:  A D Kent; S E Jones; A C Yannarell; J M Graham; G H Lauster; T K Kratz; E W Triplett
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Ordination and significance testing of microbial community composition derived from terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms: application of multivariate statistics.

Authors:  Gavin N Rees; Darren S Baldwin; Garth O Watson; Shane Perryman; Daryl L Nielsen
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.271

4.  Geographic and environmental sources of variation in lake bacterial community composition.

Authors:  Anthony C Yannarell; Eric W Triplett
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Contaminant yeast detection in industrial ethanol fermentation must by rDNA-PCR.

Authors:  A T de Souza Liberal; E A da Silva Filho; J O F de Morais; D A Simões; M A de Morais
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.858

6.  Identification of Dekkera bruxellensis as a major contaminant yeast in continuous fuel ethanol fermentation.

Authors:  A T de Souza Liberal; A C M Basílio; A do Monte Resende; B T V Brasileiro; E A da Silva-Filho; J O F de Morais; D A Simões; M A de Morais
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.772

7.  The importance of aeration strategy in fuel alcohol fermentations contaminated with Dekkera/Brettanomyces yeasts.

Authors:  D A Abbott; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Modeling bacterial contamination of fuel ethanol fermentation.

Authors:  Kenneth M Bischoff; Siqing Liu; Timothy D Leathers; Ronald E Worthington; Joseph O Rich
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production.

Authors:  Kelly A Skinner; Timothy D Leathers
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-08-28       Impact factor: 3.346

10.  Detection and identification of wild yeast contaminants of the industrial fuel ethanol fermentation process.

Authors:  A C M Basílio; P R L de Araújo; J O F de Morais; E A da Silva Filho; M A de Morais; D A Simões
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 2.188

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.