Literature DB >> 17027764

Temporal dynamics of face repetition suppression.

Alumit Ishai1, Philip C Bikle, Leslie G Ungerleider.   

Abstract

Single-unit recordings and functional brain imaging studies have shown reduced neural responses to repeated stimuli in the visual cortex. Using MEG, we compared responses evoked by repetitions of neutral faces to those evoked by fearful faces, which were either task relevant (targets) or irrelevant (distracters). Faces evoked a bi-phasic response in extrastriate cortex, peaking at 160-185 ms and at 220-250 ms, with stronger responses to neutral faces at the earlier interval and stronger responses to fearful faces at the later interval. At both latencies, repetitions of neutral and fearful targets resulted in reduced amplitude of the MEG signal. Additionally, we found that the context in which targets were presented affected their processing: fearful distracters increased the responses evoked by both neutral and fearful targets. Our data indicate that valence enhancement and context effects can be detected in extrastriate visual cortex within 250 ms and that these processes likely reflect feedback from other regions.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17027764     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  19 in total

1.  Response to familiar faces, newly familiar faces, and novel faces as assessed by ERPs is intact in adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Sara J Webb; Emily J H Jones; Kristen Merkle; Michael Murias; Jessica Greenson; Todd Richards; Elizabeth Aylward; Geraldine Dawson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  fMRI BOLD response of high-risk college students (Part 2): during memory priming of alcohol, marijuana and polydrug picture cues.

Authors:  Suchismita Ray; Catherine Hanson; Stephen J Hanson; Rifaquat M Rahman; Marsha E Bates
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.826

Review 3.  Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency?

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Vani Pariyadath
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Is a neutral expression also a neutral stimulus? A study with functional magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Fernando Carvajal; Sandra Rubio; Juan M Serrano; Marcos Ríos-Lago; Juan Alvarez-Linera; Lara Pacheco; Pilar Martín
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Multiple forms of learning yield temporally distinct electrophysiological repetition effects.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Race; David Badre; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  The fusiform response to faces: explicit versus implicit processing of emotion.

Authors:  Justin F Monroe; Mark Griffin; Amy Pinkham; James Loughead; Ruben C Gur; Timothy P L Roberts; J Christopher Edgar
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Evaluating functional localizers: the case of the FFA.

Authors:  Marc G Berman; Joonkoo Park; Richard Gonzalez; Thad A Polk; Amanda Gehrke; Scott Knaffla; John Jonides
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Brief subjective durations contract with repetition.

Authors:  Vani Pariyadath; David M Eagleman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Individual differences in valence modulation of face-selective M170 response.

Authors:  Shruti Japee; Laura Crocker; Frederick Carver; Luiz Pessoa; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2009-02

10.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of human intention understanding in temporo-parietal cortex: a combined EEG/fMRI repetition suppression paradigm.

Authors:  Stephanie Ortigue; James C Thompson; Raja Parasuraman; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.