| Literature DB >> 26358052 |
Liesbet Van der Borght1, Nathalie Schouppe2, Wim Notebaert2.
Abstract
Surprising feedback in a general knowledge test leads to an improvement in memory for both the surface features and the content of the feedback (Psychon Bull Rev 16:88-92, 2009). Based on the idea that in cognitive tasks, error is surprising (the orienting account, Cognition 111:275-279, 2009), we tested whether error feedback would be better remembered than correct feedback. Colored words were presented as feedback signals in a flanker task, where the color indicated the accuracy. Subsequently, these words were again presented during a recognition task (Experiment 1) or a lexical decision task (Experiments 2 and 3). In all experiments, memory was improved for words seen as error feedback. These results are compared to the attentional boost effect (J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 39:1223-12231, 2013) and related to the orienting account for post-error slowing (Cognition 111:275-279, 2009).Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26358052 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0705-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Res ISSN: 0340-0727