Literature DB >> 19138994

Missed adenomas during colonoscopic surveillance in individuals with Lynch Syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).

Elena M Stoffel1, D Kim Turgeon, David H Stockwell, Lili Zhao, Daniel P Normolle, Missy K Tuck, Robert S Bresalier, Norman E Marcon, John A Baron, Mack T Ruffin, Dean E Brenner, Sapna Syngal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lynch syndrome (also known as hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer) is associated with an increased risk for colorectal cancer, which can arise despite frequent colonoscopic exams. We evaluated the adenoma miss rate of conventional colonoscopy in patients with Lynch syndrome, and compared the sensitivity of chromoendoscopy versus intensive inspection for detecting polyps missed by conventional colonoscopy.
METHODS: Fifty-four subjects with Lynch syndrome underwent tandem colonoscopies at four centers of the Great Lakes-New England Clinical Epidemiology and Validation Center of the Early Detection Research Network. All participants first had a conventional colonoscopy with removal of all visualized polyps. The second endoscopy was randomly assigned as either pancolonic indigo carmine chromoendoscopy or standard colonoscopy with intensive inspection lasting >20 minutes. Size, histology, and number of polyps detected on each exam were recorded.
RESULTS: After undergoing standard colonoscopy, 28 individuals were randomized to a second exam with chromoendoscopy and 26 underwent intensive inspection. The mean interval since last colonoscopy was 17.5 months. Seventeen polyps (10 adenomas and 7 hyperplastic polyps) were identified on the first standard colonoscopies. Twenty-three additional polyps (12 adenomas and 11 hyperplastic polyps) were found on the second exams, yielding an adenoma miss rate of 55%. Fifteen polyps (5 adenomas and 10 hyperplastic polyps) were found in subjects who had chromoendoscopy and 8 polyps (7 adenomas and 1 hyperplastic polyp) in those who had intensive inspection. Chromoendoscopy was associated with more normal tissue biopsies (11 versus 5) and longer procedure times compared with intensive inspection (29.8 +/- 9.5 versus 25.3 +/- 5.8 minutes; P = 0.04). Controlling for age, number of previous colonoscopies, procedure time, and prior colonic resection, chromoendoscopy detected more polyps (P = 0.04), but adenoma detection was not significantly different compared with intensive inspection (P = 0.27).
CONCLUSIONS: Small adenomas are frequently missed in patients with Lynch syndrome. Although chromoendoscopy did not detect more missed adenomas than intensive inspection in this pilot study, larger trials are needed to determine optimal surveillance techniques in this high-risk population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19138994      PMCID: PMC2671076          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  22 in total

Review 1.  AGA technical review on hereditary colorectal cancer and genetic testing.

Authors:  F M Giardiello; J D Brensinger; G M Petersen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; J Richard Choi; Inku Hwang; James A Butler; Michael L Puckett; Hans A Hildebrandt; Roy K Wong; Pamela A Nugent; Pauline A Mysliwiec; William R Schindler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Methylene blue-aided chromoendoscopy for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia and colon cancer in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Ralf Kiesslich; Johannes Fritsch; Martin Holtmann; Heinz H Koehler; Manfred Stolte; Stephan Kanzler; Bernhard Nafe; Michael Jung; Peter R Galle; Markus F Neurath
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Chromoendoscopy with indigocarmine improves the detection of adenomatous and nonadenomatous lesions in the colon.

Authors:  R Kiesslich; M von Bergh; M Hahn; G Hermann; M Jung
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Cancer risk in mutation carriers of DNA-mismatch-repair genes.

Authors:  M Aarnio; R Sankila; E Pukkala; R Salovaara; L A Aaltonen; A de la Chapelle; P Peltomäki; J P Mecklin; H J Järvinen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1999-04-12       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  H J Järvinen; M Aarnio; H Mustonen; K Aktan-Collan; L A Aaltonen; P Peltomäki; A De La Chapelle; J P Mecklin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative group on HNPCC.

Authors:  H F Vasen; P Watson; J P Mecklin; H T Lynch
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.

Authors:  D K Rex; C S Cutler; G T Lemmel; E Y Rahmani; D W Clark; D J Helper; G A Lehman; D G Mark
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Detecting diminutive colorectal lesions at colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial of pan-colonic versus targeted chromoscopy.

Authors:  D P Hurlstone; S S Cross; R Slater; D S Sanders; S Brown
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Brian Bressler; Lawrence F Paszat; Christopher Vinden; Cindy Li; Jingsong He; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  33 in total

1.  Right colon cancer missed by virtual colonoscopy in HNPCC patient.

Authors:  G L Baiocchi; G Mazza; C Baronchelli; E Marchina; G A M Tiberio; L Grazioli; N Portolani; S M Giulini
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-09

2.  Factors affecting the treatment of multiple colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Emanuele D L Urso; Riccardo Nascimbeni; Salvatore Pucciarelli; Marco Agostini; Claudio Casella; Dario Moneghini; Diego Di Lorenzo; Isacco Maretto; Maribel Sullivan; Isabella Mammi; Alessandra Viel; Donato Nitti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Current status of chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jonathan P Nass; Sean E Connolly
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-02

Review 4.  Colorectal surveillance in Lynch syndrome families.

Authors:  Wouter H de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel; Heikki J Järvinen; Patrick M Lynch; Christoph Engel; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Hans F A Vasen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Microsatellite instability and DNA mismatch repair protein deficiency in Lynch syndrome colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Matthew B Yurgelun; Ajay Goel; Jason L Hornick; Ananda Sen; Danielle Kim Turgeon; Mack T Ruffin; Norman E Marcon; John A Baron; Robert S Bresalier; Sapna Syngal; Dean E Brenner; C Richard Boland; Elena M Stoffel
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2012-01-18

6.  Towards clinically translatable NIR fluorescence molecular guidance for colonoscopy.

Authors:  P Beatriz Garcia-Allende; Jürgen Glatz; Maximilian Koch; Jolien J Tjalma; Elmire Hartmans; Anton G T Terwisscha van Scheltinga; Panagiotis Symvoulidis; Gooitzen M van Dam; Wouter B Nagengast; Vasilis Ntziachristos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 7.  Phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity of Lynch syndrome: a complex diagnostic challenge.

Authors:  Henry T Lynch; Stephen Lanspa; Trudy Shaw; Murray Joseph Casey; Marc Rendell; Mark Stacey; Theresa Townley; Carrie Snyder; Megan Hitchins; Joan Bailey-Wilson
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Immune Profiling of Premalignant Lesions in Patients With Lynch Syndrome.

Authors:  Kyle Chang; Melissa W Taggart; Laura Reyes-Uribe; Ester Borras; Erick Riquelme; Reagan M Barnett; Guido Leoni; F Anthony San Lucas; Maria T Catanese; Federica Mori; Maria G Diodoro; Y Nancy You; Ernest T Hawk; Jason Roszik; Paul Scheet; Scott Kopetz; Alfredo Nicosia; Elisa Scarselli; Patrick M Lynch; Florencia McAllister; Eduardo Vilar
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 9.  Role of new endoscopic techniques in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Jasmijn F Haanstra; Jan H Kleibeuker; Jan J Koornstra
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Should Assessment of Quality Indicator of Colonoscopy Be Varied Depending on the Colonoscopic Technique Level?

Authors:  Bum Su Choung; Seong Hun Kim; Kyung Bo Yoo; Seung Young Seo; In Hee Kim; Seung Ok Lee; Soo Teik Lee; Sang Wook Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.