Literature DB >> 14960519

Detecting diminutive colorectal lesions at colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial of pan-colonic versus targeted chromoscopy.

D P Hurlstone1, S S Cross, R Slater, D S Sanders, S Brown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diminutive and flat colorectal lesions can be difficult to detect using conventional colonoscopic techniques. Previous data have suggested that pan-chromoscopy may improve detection rates. No randomised control trial has been performed examining detection rates of such lesions while controlling for extubation time and lavage effect. AIM: We conducted a randomised controlled trial of pan-colonic chromoscopic colonoscopy for the detection of diminutive and flat colorectal lesions while controlling for extubation time and lavage effect.
METHODS: Consecutive patients attending for routine colonoscopy were randomised to either pan-chromoscopy using 0.5% indigo carmine (IC) or targeted chromoscopy (control group). A minimum diagnostic extubation time was set at eight minutes with controls undergoing a matched volume of saline wash.
RESULTS: A total of 260 patients were randomised; 132 controls and 128 to pan-colonic chromoscopy. Extubation times did not differ significantly between the control (median 15 minutes (range 8-41)) and chromoscopy (median 17 minutes (range 8-39)) groups. The volume of IC used in the pan-chromoscopy group (median 68 ml (range 65-90)) and normal saline used in the control group (69 ml (range 60-93)) did not differ significantly. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the total number of adenomas detected (p<0.05) with significantly more diminutive (<4 mm) adenomas detected in the pan-chromoscopy group (p = 0.03). Pan-chromoscopy diagnosed more diminutive and flat lesions in the right colon compared with controls (p<0.05), with more patients with multiple adenomas (>3) detected using pan-chromoscopy (p<0.01). Hyperplastic lesions were more commonly detected in the pan-chromoscopy group compared with controls (p<0.001). More hyperplastic polyps were detected in the left colon (86% rectosigmoid) using chromoscopy compared with controls.
CONCLUSION: Chromoscopy improves the total number of adenomas detected and enhances the detection of diminutive and flat lesions. Importantly, eight diminutive lesions had foci of high grade dysplasia. Chromoscopy may benefit patients, assuming a high risk of colorectal cancer, and help in risk stratification and planning follow up colonoscopy intervals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14960519      PMCID: PMC1773964          DOI: 10.1136/gut.2003.029868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  40 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer screening in the UK: Joint Position Statement by the British Society of Gastroenterology, The Royal College of Physicians, and The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Authors:  J M Rhodes
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Pit pattern in colorectal neoplasia: endoscopic magnifying view.

Authors:  S Kudo; C A Rubio; C R Teixeira; H Kashida; E Kogure
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 3.  Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S Kudo; H Kashida; T Nakajima; S Tamura; K Nakajo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Detailed colonoscopy for detecting early superficial carcinoma: recent developments.

Authors:  S Tanaka; K Haruma; M Ito; S Nagata; H Oh-e; Y Hirota; M Kunihiro; Y Kitadai; M Yosihara; K Sumii; G Kajiyama
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK.

Authors:  B J Rembacken; T Fujii; A Cairns; M F Dixon; S Yoshida; D M Chalmers; A T Axon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-04-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Efficacy of magnifying endoscopy in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps of the large bowel.

Authors:  K Togashi; F Konishi; T Ishizuka; T Sato; S Senba; K Kanazawa
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Magnifying colonoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic colorectal lesions.

Authors:  S Y Tung; C S Wu; M Y Su
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  R J Schlemper; R H Riddell; Y Kato; F Borchard; H S Cooper; S M Dawsey; M F Dixon; C M Fenoglio-Preiser; J F Fléjou; K Geboes; T Hattori; T Hirota; M Itabashi; M Iwafuchi; A Iwashita; Y I Kim; T Kirchner; M Klimpfinger; M Koike; G Y Lauwers; K J Lewin; G Oberhuber; F Offner; A B Price; C A Rubio; M Shimizu; T Shimoda; P Sipponen; E Solcia; M Stolte; H Watanabe; H Yamabe
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Flat adenoma of the large bowel: re-evaluation with special reference to central depression.

Authors:  M Adachi; K Okinaga; T Muto
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Colonoscopic diagnosis and management of nonpolypoid early colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S Kudo; H Kashida; T Tamura; E Kogure; Y Imai; H Yamano; A R Hart
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  47 in total

1.  Histopathology using the Vienna criteria: clinical decision making is still adequate.

Authors:  D P Hurlstone
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Endoscopy and polyps-diagnostic and therapeutic advances in management.

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Eric K Johnson; Bradley Champagne; Brad Davis; Sang Lee; David Rivadeneira; Howard Ross; Dana A Hayden; Justin A Maykel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Chromocolonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: Dive into the Big Blue.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-01

4.  High magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy or high frequency 20 MHz mini probe endoscopic ultrasound staging for early colorectal neoplasia: a comparative prospective analysis.

Authors:  D P Hurlstone; S Brown; S S Cross; A J Shorthouse; D S Sanders
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Clinical significance of type V(I) pit pattern subclassification in determining the depth of invasion of colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kanao; Shinji Tanaka; Shiro Oka; Iwao Kaneko; Shigeto Yoshida; Koji Arihiro; Masaharu Yoshihara; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Photometric stereo endoscopy.

Authors:  Vicente Parot; Daryl Lim; Germán González; Giovanni Traverso; Norman S Nishioka; Benjamin J Vakoc; Nicholas J Durr
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 7.  Indications, stains and techniques in chromoendoscopy.

Authors:  P J Trivedi; B Braden
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2012-10-24

8.  I-Scan: chromoendoscopy without the hassle?

Authors:  M Atkinson; A Chak
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 4.088

9.  The use of indigocarmine spray increases the colonoscopic detection rate of adenomas.

Authors:  Kazutomo Togashi; David G Hewett; Graham L Radford-Smith; Leo Francis; Barbara A Leggett; Mark N Appleyard
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  A prospective randomized study on computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of small colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Jae Myung Cha; Joung Il Lee; Kwang Roo Joo; Sung Won Jung; Hyun Phil Shin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.