Literature DB >> 2718861

MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparison of images of autopsy specimens made at 0.3 T and 1.5 T with anatomic cryosections.

L G Hansson1, P L Westesson, R W Katzberg, R H Tallents, K Kurita, S Holtås, S A Svensson, L Eriksson, C C Johansen.   

Abstract

We made MR images of 39 autopsy specimens of the temporomandibular joint at 0.3 and 1.5 T and compared the images with anatomic cryosections. Imaging time and slice thickness were the same on scans made at each field strength. The purpose was to determine which field strength provides the best scans for imaging of the joint. Additionally, we used imaging times two and four times longer on the 0.3-T scanner to assess to what extent image quality and diagnostic accuracy could be improved. The cryosections showed that 27 of the joints were normal. Twelve had disk displacements. Ten of the joints with disk displacement also had disk deformities, and seven had bony abnormalities. Investigators who analyzed the MR images had no knowledge of the findings on the cryosections. The disk position, disk configuration, and bony abnormalities were correctly diagnosed in 85%, 77%, and 100%, respectively, on 1.5-T MR images compared with 46%, 41%, and 85%, respectively, on the 0.3-T images. When the imaging time was increased by a factor of four, the accuracy rate on the 0.3-T system became comparable to that of the 1.5-T MR scanner: 73% for disk position, 67% for disk configuration. The results suggest that the diagnostic quality of MR images of the temporomandibular joint is better on scans made at 1.5 T than on those done at 0.3 T when comparable imaging times are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2718861     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.152.6.1241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic concordance between MRI and electrovibratography of the temporomandibular joint of subjects with disc displacement disorders.

Authors:  A Deregibus; T Castroflorio; I De Giorgi; C Burzio; C Debernardi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Diagnosis of temporomandibular dysfunction syndrome--image quality at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Martina Schmid-Schwap; Wolfgang Drahanowsky; Margit Bristela; Michael Kundi; Eva Piehslinger; Soraya Robinson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Effects of standing on lumbar spine alignment and intervertebral disc geometry in young, healthy individuals determined by positional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christian I Weber; Ching-Ting Hwang; Linda R van Dillen; Simon Y Tang
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 4.  A controversy with respect to occlusion.

Authors:  Shunji Fukushima
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2016-05-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.