PURPOSE: To evaluate digital tomosynthesis (DTS) technology for daily positioning of patients receiving accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and to compare the positioning accuracy of DTS to three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients who underwent APBI were scanned daily with on-board CBCT. A subset of the CBCT projections was used to reconstruct a stack of DTS image slices. To optimize soft-tissue visibility, the DTS images were reconstructed in oblique directions so that the tumor bed, breast tissue, ribs, and lungs were well separated. Coronal and sagittal DTS images were also reconstructed. Translational shifts of DTS images were obtained on different days from the same patients and were compared with the translational shifts of corresponding CBCT images. Seventy-seven CBCT scans and 291 DTS scans were obtained from nine evaluable patients. RESULTS: Tumor beds were best visible in the oblique DTS scans. One-dimensional positioning differences between DTS and CBCT images were 0.8-1.7 mm for the six patients with clips present and 1.2-2.0 mm for the three patients without clips. Because of the limited DTS scan angle, the DTS registration accuracy along the off-plane direction is lower than the accuracy along the in-plane directions. CONCLUSIONS: For patients receiving APBI, DTS localization offers comparable accuracy to CBCT localization for daily patient positioning while reducing mechanical constraints and imaging dose.
PURPOSE: To evaluate digital tomosynthesis (DTS) technology for daily positioning of patients receiving accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and to compare the positioning accuracy of DTS to three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients who underwent APBI were scanned daily with on-board CBCT. A subset of the CBCT projections was used to reconstruct a stack of DTS image slices. To optimize soft-tissue visibility, the DTS images were reconstructed in oblique directions so that the tumor bed, breast tissue, ribs, and lungs were well separated. Coronal and sagittal DTS images were also reconstructed. Translational shifts of DTS images were obtained on different days from the same patients and were compared with the translational shifts of corresponding CBCT images. Seventy-seven CBCT scans and 291 DTS scans were obtained from nine evaluable patients. RESULTS:Tumor beds were best visible in the oblique DTS scans. One-dimensional positioning differences between DTS and CBCT images were 0.8-1.7 mm for the six patients with clips present and 1.2-2.0 mm for the three patients without clips. Because of the limited DTS scan angle, the DTS registration accuracy along the off-plane direction is lower than the accuracy along the in-plane directions. CONCLUSIONS: For patients receiving APBI, DTS localization offers comparable accuracy to CBCT localization for daily patient positioning while reducing mechanical constraints and imaging dose.
Authors: L T Niklason; B T Christian; L E Niklason; D B Kopans; D E Castleberry; B H Opsahl-Ong; C E Landberg; P J Slanetz; A A Giardino; R Moore; D Albagli; M C DeJule; P F Fitzgerald; D F Fobare; B W Giambattista; R F Kwasnick; J Liu; S J Lubowski; G E Possin; J F Richotte; C Y Wei; R F Wirth Journal: Radiology Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Frank Vicini; Kathryn Winter; William Straube; John Wong; Helen Pass; Rachel Rabinovitch; Susan Chafe; Douglas Arthur; Ivy Petersen; Beryl McCormick Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-09-29 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jin Young Yoo; Myung Jin Chung; Boram Choi; Hye Na Jung; Ji Hyun Koo; Young A Bae; Kyeongman Jeon; Hong Sik Byun; Kyung Soo Lee Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Justin C Park; Jin Sung Kim; Sung Ho Park; Matthew J Webster; Soyoung Lee; William Y Song; Youngyih Han Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sook Kien Ng; Piotr Zygmanski; Andrew Jeung; Hassan Mostafavi; Juergen Hesser; Jennifer R Bellon; Julia S Wong; Yulia Lyatskaya Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 2.102