Literature DB >> 19129932

Domain-Specific and Domain-General Learning Factors are Expressed in Genetically Heterogeneous CD-1 mice.

Stefan Kolata1, Kenneth Light, Louis D Matzel.   

Abstract

It has been established that both domain-specific (e.g. spatial) as well as domain-general (general intelligence) factors influence human cognition. However, the separation of these processes has rarely been attempted in studies using laboratory animals. Previously, we have found that the performances of outbred mice across a wide range of learning tasks correlate in such a way that a single factor can explain 30- 44% of the variance between animals. This general learning factor is in some ways qualitatively and quantitatively analogous to general intelligence in humans. The complete structure of cognition in mice, however, has not been explored due to the limited sample sizes of our previous analyses. Here we report a combined analysis from 241 CD-1 mice tested in five primary learning tasks, and a subset of mice tested in two additional learning tasks. At least two (possibly three) of the seven learning tasks placed explicit demands on spatial and/or hippocampus-dependent processing abilities. Consistent with previous findings, we report a robust general factor influencing learning in mice that accounted for 38% of the variance across tasks. In addition, a domain-specific factor was found to account for performance on that subset of tasks that shared a dependence on hippocampal and/or spatial processing. These results provide further evidence for a general learning/cognitive factor in genetically heterogeneous mice. Furthermore (and similar to human cognitive performance), these results suggest a hierarchical structure to cognitive processes in this genetically heterogeneous species.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19129932      PMCID: PMC2614349          DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2007.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intelligence        ISSN: 0160-2896


  23 in total

Review 1.  A cortical-hippocampal system for declarative memory.

Authors:  H Eichenbaum
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: acquisition and retention.

Authors:  Kimberly M Christian; Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Individual differences in the expression of a "general" learning ability in mice.

Authors:  Louis D Matzel; Yu Ray Han; Henya Grossman; Meghana S Karnik; Dave Patel; Nicholas Scott; Steven M Specht; Chetan C Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The structure of individual differences in heterogeneous stock mice across problem types and motivational systems.

Authors:  C Locurto; E Fortin; R Sullivan
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.449

5.  Selective attention is a primary determinant of the relationship between working memory and general learning ability in outbred mice.

Authors:  Stefan Kolata; Kenneth Light; Henya C Grossman; Gregory Hale; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Assessing reliability, heritability and general cognitive ability in a battery of cognitive tasks for laboratory mice.

Authors:  Michael J Galsworthy; Jose L Paya-Cano; Lin Liu; Santiago Monleón; Gregory Gregoryan; Cathy Fernandes; Leonard C Schalkwyk; Robert Plomin
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Effects of dorsal and ventral hippocampal lesions on spontaneous alternation, learned alternation and probability learning in rats.

Authors:  R Stevens; A Cowey
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1973-03-30       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Spatial learning with a minislab in the dorsal hippocampus.

Authors:  M B Moser; E I Moser; E Forrest; P Andersen; R G Morris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  The genetics of g in human and mouse.

Authors:  R Plomin
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Evidence for general cognitive ability (g) in heterogeneous stock mice and an analysis of potential confounds.

Authors:  M J Galsworthy; J L Paya-Cano; S Monleón; R Plomin
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.449

View more
  22 in total

1.  The imposition of, but not the propensity for, social subordination impairs exploratory behaviors and general cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Danielle Colas-Zelin; Kenneth R Light; Stefan Kolata; Christopher Wass; Alexander Denman-Brice; Christopher Rios; Kris Szalk; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  CNTRICS final task selection: working memory.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Marc G Berman; Randy Engle; Jessica Hurdelbrink Jones; John Jonides; Angus Macdonald; Derek Evan Nee; Thomas S Redick; Scott R Sponheim
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Working memory training promotes general cognitive abilities in genetically heterogeneous mice.

Authors:  Kenneth R Light; Stefan Kolata; Christopher Wass; Alexander Denman-Brice; Ryan Zagalsky; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Are there geniuses among the apes?

Authors:  Esther Herrmann; Josep Call
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  A broader phenotype of persistence emerges from individual differences in response to extinction.

Authors:  Bruno Sauce; Christopher Wass; Michael Lewis; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

6.  General learning ability regulates exploration through its influence on rate of habituation.

Authors:  Kenneth R Light; Henya Grossman; Stefan Kolata; Christopher Wass; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Equal performance but distinct behaviors: sex differences in a novel object recognition task and spatial maze in a highly social cichlid fish.

Authors:  Kelly J Wallace; Hans A Hofmann
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 8.  Selective attention, working memory, and animal intelligence.

Authors:  Louis D Matzel; Stefan Kolata
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  A dopaminergic gene cluster in the prefrontal cortex predicts performance indicative of general intelligence in genetically heterogeneous mice.

Authors:  Stefan Kolata; Kenneth Light; Christopher D Wass; Danielle Colas-Zelin; Debasri Roy; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The tendency for social submission predicts superior cognitive performance in previously isolated male mice.

Authors:  Louis D Matzel; Stefan Kolata; Kenneth Light; Bruno Sauce
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.