Literature DB >> 17272650

Selective attention is a primary determinant of the relationship between working memory and general learning ability in outbred mice.

Stefan Kolata1, Kenneth Light, Henya C Grossman, Gregory Hale, Louis D Matzel.   

Abstract

A single factor (i.e., general intelligence) can account for much of an individuals' performance across a wide variety of cognitive tests. However, despite this factor's robustness, the underlying process is still a matter of debate. To address this question, we developed a novel battery of learning tasks to assess the general learning abilities (GLAs) of mice. Using this battery, we previously reported a strong relationship between GLA and a task designed to tax working memory capacity (i.e., resistance to competing demands). Here we further explored this relationship by investigating which aspects of working memory (storage or processing) best predict GLAs in mice. We found that a component of working memory, selective attention, correlated with GLA comparably to working memory capacity. However, this relationship was not found for two other components of working memory, short-term memory capacity and duration. These results provide further evidence that variations in aspects of working memory and executive functions covary with general cognitive abilities.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 17272650      PMCID: PMC1838542          DOI: 10.1101/lm.408507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  13 in total

1.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach.

Authors:  Randall W Engle; Stephen W Tuholski; James E Laughlin; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  Learning and selective attention.

Authors:  P Dayan; S Kakade; P R Montague
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence.

Authors:  Jeremy R Gray; Christopher F Chabris; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 5.  Working memory: looking back and looking forward.

Authors:  Alan Baddeley
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Individual differences in the expression of a "general" learning ability in mice.

Authors:  Louis D Matzel; Yu Ray Han; Henya Grossman; Meghana S Karnik; Dave Patel; Nicholas Scott; Steven M Specht; Chetan C Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The structure of individual differences in heterogeneous stock mice across problem types and motivational systems.

Authors:  C Locurto; E Fortin; R Sullivan
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.449

Review 8.  Individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  C Jarrold; J N Towse
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model.

Authors:  A R Conway; R W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1994-12

10.  Evidence for general cognitive ability (g) in heterogeneous stock mice and an analysis of potential confounds.

Authors:  M J Galsworthy; J L Paya-Cano; S Monleón; R Plomin
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.449

View more
  16 in total

1.  The imposition of, but not the propensity for, social subordination impairs exploratory behaviors and general cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Danielle Colas-Zelin; Kenneth R Light; Stefan Kolata; Christopher Wass; Alexander Denman-Brice; Christopher Rios; Kris Szalk; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  CNTRICS final task selection: working memory.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Marc G Berman; Randy Engle; Jessica Hurdelbrink Jones; John Jonides; Angus Macdonald; Derek Evan Nee; Thomas S Redick; Scott R Sponheim
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Evolution of working memory.

Authors:  Peter Carruthers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Working memory training promotes general cognitive abilities in genetically heterogeneous mice.

Authors:  Kenneth R Light; Stefan Kolata; Christopher Wass; Alexander Denman-Brice; Ryan Zagalsky; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Comparative psychometrics: establishing what differs is central to understanding what evolves.

Authors:  Christoph J Völter; Brandon Tinklenberg; Josep Call; Amanda M Seed
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  General learning ability regulates exploration through its influence on rate of habituation.

Authors:  Kenneth R Light; Henya Grossman; Stefan Kolata; Christopher Wass; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The external-internal loop of interference: two types of attention and their influence on the learning abilities of mice.

Authors:  Bruno Sauce; Christopher Wass; Andrew Smith; Stephanie Kwan; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Impaired working memory duration but normal learning abilities found in mice that are conditionally deficient in the close homolog of L1.

Authors:  Stefan Kolata; Junfang Wu; Kenneth Light; Melitta Schachner; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Selective attention, working memory, and animal intelligence.

Authors:  Louis D Matzel; Stefan Kolata
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  A dopaminergic gene cluster in the prefrontal cortex predicts performance indicative of general intelligence in genetically heterogeneous mice.

Authors:  Stefan Kolata; Kenneth Light; Christopher D Wass; Danielle Colas-Zelin; Debasri Roy; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.