Literature DB >> 12882318

The structure of individual differences in heterogeneous stock mice across problem types and motivational systems.

C Locurto1, E Fortin, R Sullivan.   

Abstract

Sixty Heterogeneous Stock (HS) mice received a battery of six problem-solving tasks and three control procedures. The problem-solving tasks included Hebb-Williams, a place learning task conducted in a plus maze, radial maze, a working memory test following the radial maze, a set of detour problems and a visual non-matching to sample task. The control procedures consisted of land and water activity measures and a light-dark test. The correlation matrix derived from these tasks did not exhibit positive manifold, that is, positive correlations across all problem-solving tasks. Principal components analysis reduced the correlation matrix to four components with eigenvalues exceeding 1.0. Instead of the general factor solution common in the study of human problem-solving, this component structure appeared more congenial to a modular interpretation, with the four components each explaining approximately the same magnitude of matrix variance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12882318     DOI: 10.1034/j.1601-183x.2003.00006.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Brain Behav        ISSN: 1601-183X            Impact factor:   3.449


  7 in total

1.  Selective attention is a primary determinant of the relationship between working memory and general learning ability in outbred mice.

Authors:  Stefan Kolata; Kenneth Light; Henya C Grossman; Gregory Hale; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Development of a water-escape motivated version of the Stone T-maze for mice.

Authors:  P J Pistell; D K Ingram
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Are there geniuses among the apes?

Authors:  Esther Herrmann; Josep Call
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Selective attention, working memory, and animal intelligence.

Authors:  Louis D Matzel; Stefan Kolata
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Domain-Specific and Domain-General Learning Factors are Expressed in Genetically Heterogeneous CD-1 mice.

Authors:  Stefan Kolata; Kenneth Light; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Intelligence       Date:  2008

6.  Heritabilities and co-variation among cognitive traits in red junglefowl.

Authors:  Enrico Sorato; Josefina Zidar; Laura Garnham; Alastair Wilson; Hanne Løvlie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  A modular mind? A test using individual data from seven primate species.

Authors:  Federica Amici; Bradley Barney; Valen E Johnson; Josep Call; Filippo Aureli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.