Literature DB >> 19126535

The movement of motion-defined contours can bias perceived position.

Szonya Durant1, Johannes M Zanker.   

Abstract

Illusory position shifts induced by motion suggest that motion processing can interfere with perceived position. This may be because accurate position representation is lost during successive visual processing steps. We found that complex motion patterns, which can only be extracted at a global level by pooling and segmenting local motion signals and integrating over time, can influence perceived position. We used motion-defined Gabor patterns containing motion-defined boundaries, which themselves moved over time. This 'motion-defined motion' induced position biases of up to 0.5 degrees , much larger than has been found with luminance-defined motion. The size of the shift correlated with how detectable the motion-defined motion direction was, suggesting that the amount of bias increased with the magnitude of this complex directional signal. However, positional shifts did occur even when participants were not aware of the direction of the motion-defined motion. The size of the perceptual position shift was greatly reduced when the position judgement was made relative to the location of a static luminance-defined square, but not eliminated. These results suggest that motion-induced position shifts are a result of general mechanisms matching dynamic object properties with spatial location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19126535      PMCID: PMC2665809          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  16 in total

1.  Illusory displacement of equiluminous kinetic edges.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; S M Anstis
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Resolution for spatial segregation and spatial localization by motion signals.

Authors:  David Burr; Suzanne McKee; Concetta M Morrone
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Second-order motion shifts perceived position.

Authors:  David W Bressler; David Whitney
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Contribution of bottom-up and top-down motion processes to perceived position.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Position shifts following crowded second-order motion adaptation reveal processing of local and global motion without awareness.

Authors:  Thomas D Harp; David W Bressler; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The kinetic occipital (KO) region in man: an fMRI study.

Authors:  S Van Oostende; S Sunaert; P Van Hecke; G Marchal; G A Orban
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1997 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Measuring the spatial frequency selectivity of second-order texture mechanisms.

Authors:  A Sutter; G Sperling; C Chubb
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Theta motion: a paradoxical stimulus to explore higher order motion extraction.

Authors:  J M Zanker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Sensitivity to orientation modulation in micropattern-based textures.

Authors:  F A Kingdom; D Keeble; B Moulden
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Sensitivity to shearing and compressive motion in random dots.

Authors:  K Nakayama; G H Silverman; D I MacLeod; J Mulligan
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.