Literature DB >> 16359721

Second-order motion shifts perceived position.

David W Bressler1, David Whitney.   

Abstract

Many studies have documented that first-order motion influences perceived position. Here, we show that second-order (contrast defined) motion influences the perceived positions of stationary objects as well. We used a Gabor pattern as our second-order stimulus, which consisted of a drifting sinusoidal contrast modulation of a dynamic random-dot background; this second-order carrier was enveloped by a static Gaussian contrast modulation. Two vertically aligned Gabors had carrier motion in opposite directions. Subjects judged the relative positions of the Gabors' static envelopes. The positions of the Gabors appeared shifted in the direction of the carrier motion, but the effect was narrowly tuned to low temporal frequencies across all tested spatial frequencies. In contrast, first-order (luminance defined) motion shifted perceived positions across a wide range of temporal frequencies, and this differential tuning could not be explained by differences in the visibility of the patterns. The results show that second-order motion detection mechanisms contribute to perceived position. Further, the differential spatial and temporal tuning of the illusion supports the idea that there are distinct position assignment mechanisms for first and second-order motion.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16359721     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Spatial and temporal properties of the illusory motion-induced position shift for drifting stimuli.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Saumil S Patel; Harold E Bedell; Ozgur Yilmaz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Motion signals bias localization judgments: a unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions.

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Position shifts following crowded second-order motion adaptation reveal processing of local and global motion without awareness.

Authors:  Thomas D Harp; David W Bressler; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The movement of motion-defined contours can bias perceived position.

Authors:  Szonya Durant; Johannes M Zanker
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Perceptual uncertainty and line-call challenges in professional tennis.

Authors:  George Mather
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  A substantial and unexpected enhancement of motion perception in autism.

Authors:  Jennifer H Foss-Feig; Duje Tadin; Kimberly B Schauder; Carissa J Cascio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Dynamic engagement of human motion detectors across space-time coordinates.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Serial dependence in position occurs at the time of perception.

Authors:  Mauro Manassi; Alina Liberman; Anna Kosovicheva; Kathy Zhang; David Whitney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

9.  Transitions between central and peripheral vision create spatial/temporal distortions: a hypothesis concerning the perceived break of the curveball.

Authors:  Arthur Shapiro; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang; Emily Knight; Robert Ennis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Localizing non-retinotopically moving objects.

Authors:  Yuki Yamada; Takahiro Kawabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.