Literature DB >> 7762149

Measuring the spatial frequency selectivity of second-order texture mechanisms.

A Sutter1, G Sperling, C Chubb.   

Abstract

Recent investigations of texture and motion perception suggest two early filtering stages: an initial stage of selective linear filtering followed by rectification and a second stage of linear filtering. Here we demonstrate that there are differently scaled second-stage filters, and we measure their contrast modulation sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency. Our stimuli are Gabor modulations of a suprathreshold, bandlimited, isotropic carrier noise. The subjects' task is to discriminate between two possible orientations of the Gabor. Carrier noises are filtered into four octave-wide bands, centered at m = 2, 4, 8, and 16 c/deg. The Gabor test signals are w = 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 c/deg. The threshold modulation of the test signal is measured for all 20 combinations of m and w. For each carrier frequency m, the Gabor test frequency w to which subjects are maximally sensitive appears to be approximately 3-4 octaves below m. The consistent m x w interaction suggests that each second-stage spatial filter may be differentially tuned to a particular first-stage spatial frequency. The most sensitive combination is a second-stage filter of 1 c/deg with first-stage inputs of 8-16 c/deg. We conclude that second-order texture perception appears to utilize multiple channels tuned to spatial frequency and orientation, with channels tuned to low modulation frequencies appearing to be best served by carrier frequencies 8 to 16 times higher than the modulations they are tuned to detect.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7762149     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00196-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  20 in total

1.  Surface segregation driven by orientation-defined junctions.

Authors:  Takahiro Kawabe; Kayo Miura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Properties of spatial channels underlying the detection of orientation-modulations.

Authors:  Alexandre Reynaud; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Pooling of first-order inputs in second-order vision.

Authors:  Zachary M Westrick; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Orientation-selective adaptation to first- and second-order patterns in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Jonas Larsson; Michael S Landy; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Element-arrangement textures in multiple objective tasks.

Authors:  S Sabina Wolfson; Norma Graham
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2005

6.  Stereo sensitivity depends on stereo matching.

Authors:  Suzanne P McKee; Preeti Verghese; Bart Farell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The movement of motion-defined contours can bias perceived position.

Authors:  Szonya Durant; Johannes M Zanker
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Noise masking reveals channels for second-order letters.

Authors:  Ipek Oruç; Michael S Landy; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Linear and nonlinear transparencies in binocular vision.

Authors:  K Langley; D J Fleet; P B Hibbard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Nonlinear Y-Like Receptive Fields in the Early Visual Cortex: An Intermediate Stage for Building Cue-Invariant Receptive Fields from Subcortical Y Cells.

Authors:  Amol Gharat; Curtis L Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.