Literature DB >> 7839613

Sensitivity to orientation modulation in micropattern-based textures.

F A Kingdom1, D Keeble, B Moulden.   

Abstract

We have measured the sensitivity of the human visual system to sinusoidal modulations of orientation in micropattern-based textured stimuli. The result is the orientation modulation function, or OMF, which describes this sensitivity as a function of the spatial frequency of orientation modulation. We found that the OMF was bandpass with peak sensitivity at spatial frequencies ranging between 0.06 and 0.2 c/deg, depending on the size of the micropatterns. The OMF was found to be scale invariant, that is its position on the spatial frequency axis did not change with viewing distance when spatial frequency was measured in object rather than retinal units. This scale invariance was shown to result from the visual system taking into account the scale rather than the density of the micropatterns as viewing distance was changed. It has been argued by Bergen [(1991) Vision and visual dysfunction (Vol. 10B) New York: Macmillan] that scale invariance in textures is a consequence of the coupling of mechanisms which detect textural features with those which detect local luminance contrasts. We reasoned that Gabor micropattern textures might therefore show narrower OMFs compared to line micropattern textures. However we found no difference in OMF bandwidth between the Gabor and line micropattern textures, suggesting that the line micropatterns were acting as selectively as the Gabor micropatterns for the spatial scale of the mechanisms which detected the orientation modulation. Evidence is presented which suggests that the mechanisms which detected the orientation modulation in our stimuli are non-linear. Finally we showed similar OMFs for sine-wave and square-wave modulations of micropattern orientation, and similar OMFs for modulations of micropattern with orientation about the horizontal and about the vertical, the direction of modulation in both cases being horizontal. The implications of these findings for the mechanisms involved in orientation-defined texture processing is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7839613     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)e0079-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  14 in total

1.  Properties of spatial channels underlying the detection of orientation-modulations.

Authors:  Alexandre Reynaud; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Pooling of first-order inputs in second-order vision.

Authors:  Zachary M Westrick; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Orientation-selective adaptation to first- and second-order patterns in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Jonas Larsson; Michael S Landy; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Visual saliency and texture segregation without feature gradient.

Authors:  Ohad Ben-Shahar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  On the flexibility of sustained attention and its effects on a texture segmentation task.

Authors:  Yaffa Yeshurun; Barbara Montagna; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The movement of motion-defined contours can bias perceived position.

Authors:  Szonya Durant; Johannes M Zanker
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Noise masking reveals channels for second-order letters.

Authors:  Ipek Oruç; Michael S Landy; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Human primary visual cortex (V1) is selective for second-order spatial frequency.

Authors:  Luke E Hallum; Michael S Landy; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Exogenous attention enhances 2nd-order contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Antoine Barbot; Michael S Landy; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Scale dependence and channel switching in letter identification.

Authors:  Ipek Oruç; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.