We suggest for the first time that the action of multivalent cations on microtubule dynamics can result from facilitated diffusion of GTP-tubulin to the microtubule ends. Facilitated diffusion can promote microtubule assembly, because, upon encountering a growing nucleus or the microtubule wall, random GTP-tubulin sliding on their surfaces will increase the probability of association to the target sites (nucleation sites or MT ends). This is an original explanation for understanding the apparent discrepancy between the high rate of microtubule elongation and the low rate of tubulin association at the microtubule ends in the viscous cytoplasm. The mechanism of facilitated diffusion requires an attraction force between two tubulins, which can result from the sharing of multivalent counterions. Natural polyamines (putrescine, spermidine, and spermine) are present in all living cells and are potent agents to trigger tubulin self-attraction. By using an analytical model, we analyze the implication of facilitated diffusion mediated by polyamines on nucleation and elongation of microtubules. In vitro experiments using pure tubulin indicate that the promotion of microtubule assembly by polyamines is typical of facilitated diffusion. The results presented here show that polyamines can be of particular importance for the regulation of the microtubule network in vivo and provide the basis for further investigations into the effects of facilitated diffusion on cytoskeleton dynamics.
We suggest for the first time that the action of multivalent cations on microtubule dynamics can result from facilitated diffusion of GTP-tubulin to the microtubule ends. Facilitated diffusion can promote microtubule assembly, because, upon encountering a growing nucleus or the microtubule wall, random GTP-tubulin sliding on their surfaces will increase the probability of association to the target sites (nucleation sites or MT ends). This is an original explanation for understanding the apparent discrepancy between the high rate of microtubule elongation and the low rate of tubulin association at the microtubule ends in the viscous cytoplasm. The mechanism of facilitated diffusion requires an attraction force between two tubulins, which can result from the sharing of multivalent counterions. Natural polyamines (putrescine, spermidine, and spermine) are present in all living cells and are potent agents to trigger tubulin self-attraction. By using an analytical model, we analyze the implication of facilitated diffusion mediated by polyamines on nucleation and elongation of microtubules. In vitro experiments using pure tubulin indicate that the promotion of microtubule assembly by polyamines is typical of facilitated diffusion. The results presented here show that polyamines can be of particular importance for the regulation of the microtubule network in vivo and provide the basis for further investigations into the effects of facilitated diffusion on cytoskeleton dynamics.
Microtubules (MTs) are αβ-tubulin hollow polymers
that perform major organizational tasks in eukaryotic cells [1]. These structures, which
contribute to the rigidity and structural integrity of the cells, are implicated in
motor-driven intracellular traffic of organelles and vesicles, in the formation of
the mitotic spindle and in cell migration and motility. At least two physical
parameters counteract microtubule assembly in cells: (i) their highly negatively
charged surface due to the negative charge of the αβ-tubulin
heterodimer itself (20–30 e−) [2]–[4], which
induces an electrostatic self-repulsion between tubulin molecules [5],[6], (ii)
the viscosity of the cytoplasm which slows down tubulin diffusion (about
5.10 as measured in
sea urchin extracts [7]). Consequently, due to the requirement of a proper
orientation of tubulin to associate to MT ends [8],[9], the flow of tubulin
arriving directly to microtubule ends by 3D diffusion is critical to sustain the
rapid elongation of microtubules observed in cells (>10 µm/s [10]).
We propose here that facilitated diffusion may significantly enhance the association
of tubulin to growing nuclei or microtubules. The mechanism of facilitated diffusion
was already introduced to understand how DNA-binding proteins can find their target
sites by sliding and hopping along DNA molecules [11],[12]. However facilitated
diffusion can also favour tubulin association to nucleus and microtubule ends
provided that an attraction exists between tubulins and microtubules or nucleus to
enable sliding. This attraction force can be triggered by the presence of small
multivalent cations that are shared between tubulin dimers. Among small cations,
polyamines such as divalent putrescine, trivalentspermidine and tetravalent
spermine are reasonable candidates due to their high concentrations in all cells
[13],[14]. Surprisingly, despite the potential influence of
polyamines on tubulin dynamics in cells [15],[16], only a few
studies have addressed the mechanisms by which they act on microtubule assembly. The
enhancement of the polymerization rate observed in vitro was
generally attributed to the neutralization of the C-terminal tails of tubulin [2],[17],[18]. In
addition to this effect, facilitated diffusion can also explain how multivalent
cations actually act on the different aspects of microtubule assembly, notably
nucleation and elongation.In this paper we thus decipher, both theoretically and experimentally, if facilitated
diffusion can interfere with microtubule dynamics. Taking advantage of the recent
advances in the description of the electrostatic properties of tubulin [3],[4],[19], we
show that the attraction force between highly anionic tubulins, mandatory for
facilitated diffusion, can indeed occur due to the presence of polyamines. We then
develop an analytical model to describe the influence of facilitated diffusion on
microtubule assembly. Considering an attraction between tubulin dimers, we propose
that facilitated diffusion can act on MT dynamics via two different ways: (i) a
longer residency time of tubulin onto a growing nucleus which favours association,
(ii) a facilitated elongation thanks to sliding of free tubulin to the MT ends. A
series of in vitro experiments is conducted to test the model
through the analysis of light scattering curves, sedimentation assays and high
resolution AFM imaging of MTs. Finally, to approach more physiological conditions,
we show some preliminary results for MAPs-tubulin.
Results
Tubulin:Tubulin Attraction Mediated by Polyamine Sharing
Multivalent cations like polyamines can induce an electrostatic attraction
between two highly negatively charged surfaces. The theoretical treatment of
this force has been the subject of extensive studies [20]–[23]
in particular to explain the phenomenon of DNA condensation by polyamines [24]–[26]. Concerning
microtubules, their self-attraction can also be triggered by multivalent salts
and can lead to the formation of bundles [27]. The energy
benefit of association between two like-charged bodies is generally due to the
correlations between the multivalent counterions condensed on their surfaces.
Here we will show that the interaction between two tubulin heterodimers, which
are highly negatively charged proteins with a net charge about 20–30
e−, at pH around 7 [19], may also be
influenced by this mechanism. Let us first estimate the attraction energy
between two tubulin heterodimers in the presence of polyamines. The
αβ-tubulin heterodimer is a nonspherical globule, having
dimensions of 46×80×65 Å with two long C-terminal
tails (∼35 Å) [3]. Most of the tubulin
charge, at least 40%, is concentrated in the C-terminal tails so that
the charge distribution on its surface is non homogeneous. We then need to
investigate the electrostatic properties of the C-terminal tails and of the
remaining of the heterodimer molecule separately. As described in details in
Text
S1, we obtained after theoretical developments the energy gain for these
two interactions. The attraction energy for two heterodimers without the
C-terminal tails is positive for putrescine and spermidine and negative only for
spermine (−0.26 K), which means a weak
energy benefit. As this result was obtained by considering that there is only
spermine on heterodimer surfaces, we might expect that the resulting attraction
force is negligible in physiological conditions where spermine competes with
other cations or proteins for tubulin neutralization. On the other hand, the
attraction energy becomes significantly larger between two interacting tubulin
C-terminal tails. We obtained in this case U values
of +4.7, −2.6, −5 and −6.2
K for cation valence
Z = 1, 2, 3 and 4
respectively, showing the presence of an attraction energy when Z>1 and
which increases with the valence of ions. The energy benefit per counterion in
correlations remains lower than K for divalent
putrescine (see Text S1) so that it could hardly induce an attraction force between
C-terminal tails due to thermal agitation. On the other hand, we expect that
trivalent spermine and tetravalent spermidine can induce a significant
attraction force between the C-terminal tails of tubulin dimers (see Text S1 and
Figure 1A).
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the mechanism of facilitated diffusion.
(A) Attraction between two tubulin heterodimers mediated by polyamines.
The attraction is mediated by the two C-terminal tails of one tubulin
dimer, which, for entropic reasons (separation distance between
the two C-termini tails on a tubulin dimer), are likely to
share polyamines with two C-terminal tails of another tubulin dimer. (B)
In the absence of an attraction force, many collisions between tubulin
and nucleus do not result in association, whereas, in the presence of an
attraction force, both facilitated diffusion via sliding and an increase
of the interaction lifetime favour association to the growing nucleus.
(C) In the presence of an attraction force, sliding of tubulin along the
cylindrical surface of MT favours tubulin association to the MT
ends.
Schematic representation of the mechanism of facilitated diffusion.
(A) Attraction between two tubulin heterodimers mediated by polyamines.
The attraction is mediated by the two C-terminal tails of one tubulin
dimer, which, for entropic reasons (separation distance between
the two C-termini tails on a tubulin dimer), are likely to
share polyamines with two C-terminal tails of another tubulin dimer. (B)
In the absence of an attraction force, many collisions between tubulin
and nucleus do not result in association, whereas, in the presence of an
attraction force, both facilitated diffusion via sliding and an increase
of the interaction lifetime favour association to the growing nucleus.
(C) In the presence of an attraction force, sliding of tubulin along the
cylindrical surface of MT favours tubulin association to the MT
ends.As the correlations between monovalent cations cannot contribute to the
attraction force, the replacement of multivalent cations at high monovalent salt
concentrations by monovalent ones lowers the attraction force. The fractional
surface concentration of the multivalent cations, which is the ratio of the
multivalent counterion surface density to the total surface density of the
counterions, is very sensitive to the counterion valence [28],[29].
Higher valence cations are generally better competitors for the surface
neutralization than lower valence ones (see Text S2 and
[28]). In addition, the monovalent salt concentration
above which multivalent cations are removed from the surface increases with the
surface charge density [28]. For the highly negatively charged C-terminal
tails, assuming σ∼1 e−/nm2 and
using the model of Rouzina and Bloomfield [28] (see Text S2,
supplementary file), about 50% of the spermidine counterions are
removed with 300 µM spermidine and 150 mM KCl.
Experiments: AFM imaging
We first checked by atomic force microscopy if the presence of polyamines, in
the physiological range, does not lead to aberrant microtubule structures.
At low and moderate spermidine concentrations (<400
µM in 25 mM MES-KOH pH 6.8, 20% glycerol),
we observed the formation of long microtubules like in the absence of
polyamines (Figures 2A,
2B, and 3A). At
higher concentrations of spermidine (>400
µM), very short microtubules, oligomers and (or)
aggregates, and to a less extend MT bundles coexist (Figures 2C and 3B). It has already been observed that
multivalent cations at high concentrations can promote the formation of
large bundles [27]. The formation of small oligomers and
(or) aggregates was also expected for a strong attraction regime
(Regime III, see “elongation”
section). The critical polyamine concentrations above which
aberrant structures appear increase with the ionic strength. For example, in
the presence of 800 µM spermidine and without KCl, small
aggregates or oligomers are observed whereas, with 100 mM KCl, only long
microtubules are observed at 800 µM spermidine.
Figure 2
AFM images of microtubules assembled in the presence of various
concentrations of spermidine in buffer M with 30 µM
tubulin.
Scan area: 8×8 µm2. (A) Control. (B)
200 µM spermidine. (C) 800 µM spermidine.
Microtubules formed in the presence of moderate concentrations of
spermidine (<400 µm) had a normal
appearance without any tendency for bundling. Higher spermidine
concentrations lead to the apparition of shorter MTs and some
aberrant structures (oligomers, aggregates, see also
Figure 3).
Figure 3
High resolution AFM images of microtubules in the presence of
spermidine in buffer M.
Scan area: 4×4 µm2. (A) 200
µM spermidine. (B) 800 µM spermidine. At
moderate spermidine concentrations (<400
µM), long microtubules coexist with free tubulin
dimers like in the absence of polyamines. Increasing polyamine
concentration leads to the appearance of small tubulin oligomers or
aggregates (green circles), microtubule bundles
(arrow) and smaller microtubules. Interestingly
oligomers or aggregates can also be adsorbed on MT surface
(pink circles), as predicted for strong
attractions (Regime III).
AFM images of microtubules assembled in the presence of various
concentrations of spermidine in buffer M with 30 µM
tubulin.
Scan area: 8×8 µm2. (A) Control. (B)
200 µM spermidine. (C) 800 µM spermidine.
Microtubules formed in the presence of moderate concentrations of
spermidine (<400 µm) had a normal
appearance without any tendency for bundling. Higher spermidine
concentrations lead to the apparition of shorter MTs and some
aberrant structures (oligomers, aggregates, see also
Figure 3).
High resolution AFM images of microtubules in the presence of
spermidine in buffer M.
Scan area: 4×4 µm2. (A) 200
µM spermidine. (B) 800 µM spermidine. At
moderate spermidine concentrations (<400
µM), long microtubules coexist with free tubulin
dimers like in the absence of polyamines. Increasing polyamine
concentration leads to the appearance of small tubulin oligomers or
aggregates (green circles), microtubule bundles
(arrow) and smaller microtubules. Interestingly
oligomers or aggregates can also be adsorbed on MT surface
(pink circles), as predicted for strong
attractions (Regime III).
Polyamines Promote Microtubule Assembly via Electrostatic Interaction with
the C-Terminal Tail
Effect of putrescine, spermidine and spermine on microtubule assembly
We measured the effects of polyamines on the maximum rate of microtubule
assembly by analyzing light scattering curves and the mass of polymerized
tubulin by sedimentation (more specific aspects of microtubule
assembly, notably nucleation and elongation, will be studied in the
following sections). It appears that spermidine
(Z = 3) and spermine
(Z = 4) promote MT
assembly very efficiently while putrescine
(Z = 2) has no effect
up to 10 mM (Figure 4A).
As previously reported, increasing the charge of the counterion favors MT
assembly [17]. In agreement with our model, the effect
of putrescine is negligible due to a lower energy gain in counterion sharing
and an easier replacement by monovalent cations whereas the effects of
spermidine and spermine on MT assembly are more pronounced. Above
150–300 µM, the beneficial effects of spermine and
spermidine on the maximum polymerization rate decrease while they still
induce a high polymerized mass (Figure 4B). However, under these conditions, we detected by AFM
the presence of tubulin aggregates or oligomers in agreement with a non-zero
value of the light scattering curve at the beginning of assembly
(data not shown). Such a strong attraction between
tubulin heterodimers is not due to a simple neutralization effect since
neutralization does not lead to attraction between heterodimers. It should
be triggered by an attraction force via polyamine correlations between
tubulin dimers.
Figure 4
Effect of polyamines on the maximum slope of microtubule
assembly.
The tubulin concentration (12 µM) was
purposely fixed to a value near the critical concentration in buffer
M. (A) Both spermidine and spermine promote microtubule assembly at
submilimolar concentrations whereas putrescine is unable to improve
tubulin polymerization even at large concentrations
(>1 mM). However, at high concentrations
of spermidine and spermine (>200
µM), tubulin aggregates are formed which lowers
the apparent assembly slope leading to a bell-shape profile. (B) SDS
page analyses reveal that spermidine gradually increases the pellet
mass. As observed by AFM, the increase of the pellet mass is due to
microtubule formation at moderate spermidine concentrations
(25–200 µM) but, at higher
spermidine concentrations (0.5–2 mM),
oligomers and (or) tubulin aggregates are also observed and
participate to the increase of the pellet mass. The dashed line
represents the transition between the zones of microtubule assembly
and tubulin aggregation.
Effect of polyamines on the maximum slope of microtubule
assembly.
The tubulin concentration (12 µM) was
purposely fixed to a value near the critical concentration in buffer
M. (A) Both spermidine and spermine promote microtubule assembly at
submilimolar concentrations whereas putrescine is unable to improve
tubulin polymerization even at large concentrations
(>1 mM). However, at high concentrations
of spermidine and spermine (>200
µM), tubulin aggregates are formed which lowers
the apparent assembly slope leading to a bell-shape profile. (B) SDS
page analyses reveal that spermidine gradually increases the pellet
mass. As observed by AFM, the increase of the pellet mass is due to
microtubule formation at moderate spermidine concentrations
(25–200 µM) but, at higher
spermidine concentrations (0.5–2 mM),
oligomers and (or) tubulin aggregates are also observed and
participate to the increase of the pellet mass. The dashed line
represents the transition between the zones of microtubule assembly
and tubulin aggregation.
Influence of KCl on tubulin assembly in the presence of polyamines
Counterion correlations are known to be sensitive to the replacement of
multivalent cations by monovalent ones. Therefore, upon increasing KCl
concentration, the beneficial effect of polyamines on tubulin assembly
should be significantly inhibited (see Text S2
for details). We thus analyzed the light scattering curves for different
concentrations of KCl with or without spermidine. For all conditions, we
verified using AFM that only MTs and not tubulin aggregates were formed. As
predicted by our model, in the absence of KCl, the rate of assembly is
higher with 100 µM spermidine than in its absence (compare Figure 5B with Figure 5A).
In the presence of 50 mM KCl and 100 µM spermidine, the slopes of
the assembly curves drop abruptly and the beneficial effect of spermidine is
no longer observed. This is due to the replacement of polyamines by
potassium ions which inhibits the polyamine sharing between tubulin dimers
(see Text
S2). To counteract the negative effect of KCl on tubulin assembly,
the polyamine concentration can be increased (Figure 5C).
Figure 5
Effect of the competition between monovalent cations and
multivalent polyamines on tubulin polymerization (50 mM
MES-KOH pH 6.8, 1 mM EGTA, 30 µM tubulin, 2 mM
MgCl).
(A) Inhibition of the tubulin assembly with the increase of KCl
concentration. (B) Effect of KCl on tubulin assembly in the presence
of 100 µM spermidine. The beneficial effect of spermidine
is inhibited for KCl concentrations larger than 50 mM. We attribute
this phenomenon to the replacement of polyamines by monovalent
cations on tubulin surface which then inhibits the attraction
between tubulin dimers (see Text S2). (C) To keep a high
assembly rate at high ionic strengths, polyamine concentrations can
be increased so that polyamine surface density on tubulin surface
remains nearly constant. (AFM control revealed the presence of only
microtubules under such conditions.) (D) Influence of spermidine on
S-tubulin assembly. In the absence of the C-terminal tail, the
beneficial effect of polyamine on tubulin assembly disappears.
Effect of the competition between monovalent cations and
multivalent polyamines on tubulin polymerization (50 mM
MES-KOH pH 6.8, 1 mM EGTA, 30 µM tubulin, 2 mM
MgCl).
(A) Inhibition of the tubulin assembly with the increase of KCl
concentration. (B) Effect of KCl on tubulin assembly in the presence
of 100 µM spermidine. The beneficial effect of spermidine
is inhibited for KCl concentrations larger than 50 mM. We attribute
this phenomenon to the replacement of polyamines by monovalent
cations on tubulin surface which then inhibits the attraction
between tubulin dimers (see Text S2). (C) To keep a high
assembly rate at high ionic strengths, polyamine concentrations can
be increased so that polyamine surface density on tubulin surface
remains nearly constant. (AFM control revealed the presence of only
microtubules under such conditions.) (D) Influence of spermidine on
S-tubulin assembly. In the absence of the C-terminal tail, the
beneficial effect of polyamine on tubulin assembly disappears.
Involvement of the C-terminal tail of tubulin dimers
Another point which needs to be verified is the implication of the C-terminal
tails of tubulin in the mechanism of counterion sharing between two tubulin
heterodimers. We thus cleaved the charged C-terminal tails of tubulin by
subtilisin [30] and observed that this led to the loss of
the beneficial effect of spermidine on tubulin polymerization (Figure 5D). This indicates
that the C-terminal tails are predominantly implicated in the mechanism of
counterion sharing, which confirms previous results obtained with
oligocations [17].
Attraction of Tubulin Dimers onto Microtubules Mediated by Polyamines
As facilitated diffusion requires tubulin sliding on microtubules, we
investigated if polyamines can mediate an attraction of tubulin dimers on
microtubules. To measure this interaction, fluorescent Cy3-labeled tubulin
(0.3 µM) was allowed to interact with non
fluorescent taxol-stabilized microtubules (4 µM polymerized
tubulin). This step was conducted without GTP at 22°C and
without taxol to avoid the formation of new microtubules with Cy3-tubulin
dimers. We then detected the attraction of fluorescent tubulin through the
co-precipitation with microtubules at 20,000×g for 10 min at
22°C. The analysis of the fluorescence intensities of both supernatants
and pellets shows than Cy3-tubulin was indeed co-precipitated with MTs at
spermidine concentrations higher than 10 µM (Figure 6). Even if the supernatant
fluorescence intensity is lower at higher spermidine concentrations, we note
that the concentration of free tubulin in the supernatant remains close to its
maximum at low spermidine concentrations. Therefore the attraction of tubulin
onto microtubule is relatively weak under these conditions, with both free and
adsorbed Cy3-tubulin coexisting. We shall see in the
“elongation” section that the strength of this interaction
is an important parameter which modulates the efficiency of facilitated
diffusion. As a control, figure S1 in supplementary files shows more
directly the attraction of Cy3-tubulin on a MT pellet mediated by 200
µM spermidine.
Figure 6
Attraction of tubulin dimers onto microtubule mediated by spermidine.
0.3 µM of Cy3-labeled tubulin was allowed to interact with 4
µM of non fluorescent taxol-stabilized microtubules at various
concentrations of spermidine (buffer M without GTP and without
free taxol). The fluorescence intensity of both pellets and
supernatants were then measured after centrifugation at
20,000×g for 10 min. The results show that Cy3-tubulin
co-precipitated with microtubules at spermidine concentrations higher
than 10 µM (under the conditions tested, we measured
that no fluorescent tubulins sedimented in the absence of
microtubules).
Attraction of tubulin dimers onto microtubule mediated by spermidine.
0.3 µM of Cy3-labeled tubulin was allowed to interact with 4
µM of non fluorescent taxol-stabilized microtubules at various
concentrations of spermidine (buffer M without GTP and without
free taxol). The fluorescence intensity of both pellets and
supernatants were then measured after centrifugation at
20,000×g for 10 min. The results show that Cy3-tubulin
co-precipitated with microtubules at spermidine concentrations higher
than 10 µM (under the conditions tested, we measured
that no fluorescent tubulins sedimented in the absence of
microtubules).
Facilitated Nucleation
Introduction
In contrast to elongation, which can be considered as a pseudo-first order
reaction process, the nucleation step is a more complex mechanism which
requires the association of a few tubulin heterodimers to form a stable
nucleus. Based on previous models of actin polymerization [31],[32], Voter and
Erikson developed a widely used model of two-dimensional nucleation [33].
They showed that the tenth time of the assembly curve (the time
necessary to reach 10% of the plateau value) is
expected to decrease at the nth power of the tubulin
concentration where, for their model, 2n−1 is the number of
tubulin dimers in the critical nucleus. More recently, using a different
approach, Flyvbjerg and co-workers considered nucleation as process with
successive intermediate steps of assembly during which only free tubulins
are added to the growing nucleus [34]. In this
model, there is still a similar power law dependence but between the final
mass of polymerized tubulin and the tenth time of assembly. In addition they
proposed that the size of the stable nucleus can be derived from the initial
slope of the assembly curve in a log-log plot, this slope being proportional
to the number of successive steps required to form the stable nucleus [34].Whereas it is accepted that the tenth time of assembly decreases with a power
law dependence in tubulin concentration (or the final mass of
polymerized tubulin), the size of the stable nucleus for
in vitro assembly is still under debate [35]. A larger nucleus of 15 dimers was found in
[34] contrary to others which found a smaller
nucleus of about 6 dimers, see for example [36]. Recently, it
was suggested that the nucleus is not a clearly defined structure and that
the number of dimers forming the nucleus is rather an average value between
many alternative pathways leading to microtubule elongation [37]. This important issue needs however to be
tackled specifically. Here we will mainly focus our attention on the
influence of facilitated diffusion on nucleation using both the models of
Flyvbjerg and co-workers and of Voter and Erikson.
Influence of facilitated diffusion
Nucleation requires the association of a few dimers and
implies that the encounters take place via 3D diffusion. The probability of
formation of such improbable complex can however be significantly enhanced
by facilitated diffusion [8]. Facilitated diffusion, as already
demonstrated for oppositely charged proteins [6], requires an
attractive interaction between the encounter pair (nucleus and
tubulin) to be fully operational. It leads to an increase of
the interaction lifetime after collision so that there is enough time for
diffusion and rotation until the target site is found according to the
geometrical constraint (see Figure 1B), assuming that the attractive interaction is weak and
will not dramatically affect protein mobility. Hydrophobic and electrostatic
attractions between tubulin dimers can play a similar role. For example the
tubulin critical concentration is reduced in the presence of glycerol [38], an effect attributed to a lower water
activity and enhanced hydrophobic attraction. Regarding electrostatic
interactions, the high negative charge of tubulin is responsive for an
electrostatic repulsion which is unfavorable for nucleation. Transforming
electrostatic repulsion into electrostatic attraction using polyamines would
surely increase the lifetime of interaction [39] between a new
arriving GTP-tubulin and the nascent nucleus and thus increases the
nucleation rate. An increase of the tubulin:nucleus interaction lifetime can
be integrated in a simple approach. If the time lapse between two
consecutive encounters is shorter than the lifetime of the tubulin:nucleus
interaction per encounter, the association constant should weakly depend on
the free GTP-tubulin concentration because there will be enough GTP-tubulin
to supply specific sites. This occurs above a concentration designated here
as CL, below which the association rate decreases more abruptly
with the free tubulin concentration. This latter feature is typical of the
facilitated diffusion and differs from the previous nucleation theories.
Experiments
Figure 7A shows the
assembly curve for various concentrations of tubulin with or without
spermidine. The measured value of the tenth time is represented in Figure 7B. The results are
pretty different in control and in the presence of polyamine. Without
spermidine, the log–log plot of the tenth time versus tubulin
concentrations appears as a straight line in agreement with theories. In the
presence of 100 µM spermidine, the tenth time is shorter than in
the absence of spermidine whatever the tubulin concentration, thus
suggesting that the rate of nucleation is globally higher. We also note that
the tenth time decreases to a plateau value of about 0.5–1 min at
tubulin concentrations larger than C
(∼20 µM). An increase of tubulin
concentration has then little effect on nucleation duration, which indicates
that 3D diffusion of tubulin to a nascent nucleus is no more the rate
limiting step. As predicted by the model of facilitated diffusion, the flux
of tubulin delivered to the nucleus may then be sufficient to sustain the
highest rate of nucleation via facilitated nucleation. When the tubulin
concentration decreases below C, this is no
longer the case since the tenth time increases.
Figure 7
Facilitated nucleation mediated by polyamines.
(A) Microtubules were assembled at various concentrations of tubulin
with or without 100 µM spermidine at 37°C.
(25 mM MES-KOH pH 6.8, 1 mM EGTA, 30 µM
tubulin, 2 mM MgCl). The samples were placed in a pre-warmed cuvette
to initiate polymerization. (B) Log-log plot of tenth time versus
tubulin concentrations extracted from (A). The experimental data are
properly fitted by a straight line with a slope of −2.9 in
the absence of spermidine. In contrast, in the presence of
spermidine, the tenth time is nearly constant over a large range of
tubulin concentration (20–40
µM), as represented by the horizontal line.
Indeed the shortest nucleation duration is already reached at
tubulin concentration larger than C
(∼20 µM) because of
facilitated nucleation. For lower concentrations than
C, the tenth time increases
sharply when the tubulin concentration decreases, as represented by
the linear increase in the log–log plot.
Facilitated nucleation mediated by polyamines.
(A) Microtubules were assembled at various concentrations of tubulin
with or without 100 µM spermidine at 37°C.
(25 mM MES-KOH pH 6.8, 1 mM EGTA, 30 µM
tubulin, 2 mM MgCl). The samples were placed in a pre-warmed cuvette
to initiate polymerization. (B) Log-log plot of tenth time versus
tubulin concentrations extracted from (A). The experimental data are
properly fitted by a straight line with a slope of −2.9 in
the absence of spermidine. In contrast, in the presence of
spermidine, the tenth time is nearly constant over a large range of
tubulin concentration (20–40
µM), as represented by the horizontal line.
Indeed the shortest nucleation duration is already reached at
tubulin concentration larger than C
(∼20 µM) because of
facilitated nucleation. For lower concentrations than
C, the tenth time increases
sharply when the tubulin concentration decreases, as represented by
the linear increase in the log–log plot.As multivalent polyamines significantly influence the nucleation duration, we
studied whether spermidine affects the critical size of the nucleus. In
Figure 7B, the slope
of the curve without spermidine, n, is about −3,
which indicates that 5 dimers form the critical nucleus, in agreement with
previous reports (the slope is about −2.4 in [35],
−3.7 in [33] and −4 in [36]). However this
curve could not be used to analyze the evolution of the critical nucleus in
the presence of spermidine because the experimental data are not properly
fitted by a straight line. To proceed differently, we use the theory
developed by Flyvbjerg et al. [34]. Assuming
some scaling properties of the assembly curves, Flyvbjerg et al. obtained
that the critical size of the nucleus is then 3p, where
p is the slope of log
[I(t)/I(∞)] versus
log(t) ((I(t)) is the scattered light intensity at
a time t). One of these scaling properties states that the
tenth time scales like
I(∞) (equ. 3
in ref
[34]), which indicates that nucleation duration is
related to the final mass of microtubules. Our experiments confirmed this
scaling property without spermidine but, in the presence of 100 µM
spermidine, the power law dependence does not fit properly the data (see
Figure
S2). Facilitated nucleation explains this finding since the tenth
time is roughly constant for tubulin concentrations higher than
C. In spite of this, we show in Figure 8 the slope of
[I(t)/I(∞)] versus
log(t) extracted from light scattering curves because
it is an interesting indicator of the critical size of the nucleus [34],[35]. The results
show that spermidine does not change significantly the mean value of the
assembly slope at early times (Figure 8), 2.36 for control and 2.32 with spermidine. This leads
to a critical nucleus of about 7 dimers, slightly larger than 5 dimers
obtained in Figure 7B.
The critical size of the nucleus may then be not affected by the addition of
spermidine. However, in the absence of a valid theory, this prediction
remains to be tested.
Figure 8
Scaling properties and nucleus size in the presence of
spermidine.
Initial slope of log
[(I(t)/I(∞)] versus tubulin
concentration. This slope is an interesting indicator of the number
of tubulin dimers in the critical nuclei. The mean slope over
tubulin concentrations is similar with or without spermidine, 2.36
and 2.32 respectively. Spermidine may then not affect the critical
size of the nucleus but this remains to be demonstrated with a valid
theory. Inset: examples of log–log plot
of [(I(t)/I(∞)]. The
slopes were extracted at early times when the curves display a
straight line.
Scaling properties and nucleus size in the presence of
spermidine.
Initial slope of log
[(I(t)/I(∞)] versus tubulin
concentration. This slope is an interesting indicator of the number
of tubulin dimers in the critical nuclei. The mean slope over
tubulin concentrations is similar with or without spermidine, 2.36
and 2.32 respectively. Spermidine may then not affect the critical
size of the nucleus but this remains to be demonstrated with a valid
theory. Inset: examples of log–log plot
of [(I(t)/I(∞)]. The
slopes were extracted at early times when the curves display a
straight line.In summary, the important results of this section are: (i) nucleation rates
are higher in the presence of spermidine compared to control, (ii) with
spermidine, the power law dependence between the tenth time and tubulin
concentration is no longer valid at tubulin concentrations higher than
C, contrary to previous nucleation
models but in agreement with a facilitated diffusion mechanism.
Facilitated Diffusion to the MT Ends
The probability that free GTP-tubulin molecules encounter long microtubule
cylinders can be significantly larger than that of a direct encounter with MT
ends. Therefore, after the encounters of tubulin with the MT wall, if the
GTP-tubulin can proceed to the random scan of the MT via surface diffusion, a
higher association rate of the free GTP-tubulin to the MT ends is expected
(Figure 1C). A parallel
can be drawn here between DNA and MTs. Indeed it has been shown that facilitated
diffusion of site-specific proteins via 3D diffusion and 1D diffusion on long
DNA increases their association rate to target site up to two orders of
magnitude [40]. In recent theoretical studies [40],[41], simple equations
have been developed to describe qualitatively the effect of facilitated
diffusion on DNA/protein association constant, in particular, the useful model
developed by Hu et al. [42] which describes in a simple manner the
influence of the attraction energy on facilitated diffusion. Via straightforward
modification of this model, we extend its domain of application to free
GTP-tubulin diffusion to the MT ends. As the persistence length of MTs is larger
than 1 mm [43], the MT is considered as a rigid cylinder. In
addition, contrary to DNA, its larger radius implies that facilitated diffusion
proceeds through 2D diffusion on the MT wall. The main assumption of this model
is to consider that the flux of proteins delivered by 3D diffusion to the MT
extremities at a distance lower than λ from one end is
equal to the flux of protein delivered to the end via surface sliding at the
equilibrium [42]. Considering λ as the
sliding distance on the MT wall, if the separation distance from the nearest MT
end and the new coming GTP-tubulin is shorter than λ,
the GTP-tubulin can find its target site through 2D diffusion whereas for larger
distances it will be released from the MT wall before reaching it. Then:where D are the
tubulin diffusion constants in the bulk solution and at the MT surface
respectively, λ is the 2D diffusion
length, a is the microtubule radius,
C is the free tubulin concentration,
C is the surface density of tubulin
adsorbed on the MT surface. The first term of this equation is the
3D diffusion near the MT extremities, and the second term
represents the sliding.Three different regimes can then be derived (see Text S3):
Regime I: L≪λ
This regime occurs at the early stage of MT assembly when the mean MT length
(L) is very short
(L<λ∼100 nm for
U
with e = 4 nm,
a = 12 nm,
D),
which corresponds to the elongation step just after nucleation. Provided
that MT is shorter than the diffusion length λ,
every time a free tubulin touches the MT surface via 3D diffusion, it is
able to find its binding sites at the MT extremities via sliding:The diffusion to the MT ends does not apparently depend on
the attraction energy but the influence of U is
to set the critical length λ (see equ.C2
and C3 in
Text
S3) up to which we quit the Regime I. As λ
is longer for stronger attraction, it indicates that regime I is
valid for longer MTs under such conditions. It thus results in a highly
beneficial effect of facilitated diffusion since the diffusion to the MT
ends increases proportionally to L (see Figure 9A). We also note
that λ scales like
D (see equ.C2
Text
S3). A decrease of D due to surface
friction (strong attraction) on MT surface could then
restrict the domain of validity of Regime I to shorter microtubules.
Consequently, facilitated elongation loses part of its effectiveness (see
Figure 9B). Let us
remark that D is a difficult parameter to
estimate theoretically and to measure experimentally.
Figure 9
Effects of facilitated diffusion on elongation.
(A) Facilitated diffusion of free GTP-tubulin to the MT ends versus
mean MT lengths for different absorption energies
(U). For
Uc = −0.1
K, the effect of facilitated diffusion
can be neglected. For
Uc = −1 and
−2.5 K, diffusion of tubulin to
the MT ends is facilitated by sliding. When the MTs are short i.e.
at the early stage of MT polymerization, the regime I prevails,
which is characterized by an increase of
J with MT length. For
longer MTs, for example L>0.1 µm
for Uc = −1
K, the facilitated diffusion is not
increasing with L anymore (Regime II). The sharp
decrease of J when MT length
approaches its maximum length (10 µm) is
due to the low free GTP-tubulin concentration near the plateau of
the assembly curve. The regime III occurs for
Uc = −6
K and we can observe a rapid decrease
of J with L. It is worth
noting that we plotted the average values of the facilitated
diffusion to the MT ends versus the average length of the MTs. In
other words, it should not be confused with the elongation rate of
individual MT. Parameters:
L
m. (B) In (A),
we assumed that
D3 = D2.
The benefit of facilitated diffusion was then maximum. If we now
consider that
D2/D3 = 0.3
or
D2/D3 = 0.1
due to hindered diffusion on microtubules, we observe that the
transition from regime I to regime II will arise at shorter
L values. This partly inhibits the beneficial
effect of facilitated diffusion of the elongation rate.
D5.10−12
m2s−1. (C) Simple model of
microtubule assembly versus incubation time for three attraction
energies, which points out the influence of facilitated diffusion on
the MT elongation. For this purpose, it is arbitrary assumed that
the mean number of MT nuclei is the same for the three different
conditions (see Text S3). It can be though as the
last part of the light scattering curve, after the inflexion point,
which is more elongation-sensitive. In addition, we assume that the
elongation rate is proportional to the difference
(J),
where J is the critical flux of GTP
tubulin for which the elongation rate equals the shortening rate.
Indeed it is has been shown both experimentally and theoretically
that increasing the GTP-tubulin concentration above the critical
concentration leads to a linear increase of the mean elongation rate
[45]. This figure shows that
facilitated elongation of MTs through GTP-tubulin sliding both
results in a higher amount of polymerized tubulins and a more abrupt
slope near the plateau value. Parameters:
J
m
Effects of facilitated diffusion on elongation.
(A) Facilitated diffusion of free GTP-tubulin to the MT ends versus
mean MT lengths for different absorption energies
(U). For
Uc = −0.1
K, the effect of facilitated diffusion
can be neglected. For
Uc = −1 and
−2.5 K, diffusion of tubulin to
the MT ends is facilitated by sliding. When the MTs are short i.e.
at the early stage of MT polymerization, the regime I prevails,
which is characterized by an increase of
J with MT length. For
longer MTs, for example L>0.1 µm
for Uc = −1
K, the facilitated diffusion is not
increasing with L anymore (Regime II). The sharp
decrease of J when MT length
approaches its maximum length (10 µm) is
due to the low free GTP-tubulin concentration near the plateau of
the assembly curve. The regime III occurs for
Uc = −6
K and we can observe a rapid decrease
of J with L. It is worth
noting that we plotted the average values of the facilitated
diffusion to the MT ends versus the average length of the MTs. In
other words, it should not be confused with the elongation rate of
individual MT. Parameters:
L
m. (B) In (A),
we assumed that
D3 = D2.
The benefit of facilitated diffusion was then maximum. If we now
consider that
D2/D3 = 0.3
or
D2/D3 = 0.1
due to hindered diffusion on microtubules, we observe that the
transition from regime I to regime II will arise at shorter
L values. This partly inhibits the beneficial
effect of facilitated diffusion of the elongation rate.
D5.10−12
m2s−1. (C) Simple model of
microtubule assembly versus incubation time for three attraction
energies, which points out the influence of facilitated diffusion on
the MT elongation. For this purpose, it is arbitrary assumed that
the mean number of MT nuclei is the same for the three different
conditions (see Text S3). It can be though as the
last part of the light scattering curve, after the inflexion point,
which is more elongation-sensitive. In addition, we assume that the
elongation rate is proportional to the difference
(J),
where J is the critical flux of GTP
tubulin for which the elongation rate equals the shortening rate.
Indeed it is has been shown both experimentally and theoretically
that increasing the GTP-tubulin concentration above the critical
concentration leads to a linear increase of the mean elongation rate
[45]. This figure shows that
facilitated elongation of MTs through GTP-tubulin sliding both
results in a higher amount of polymerized tubulins and a more abrupt
slope near the plateau value. Parameters:
J
m
Regime II, L≫λ and
moderate attractions (2πaLey
When MTs are longer than λ and for moderate attractions, we enter in
the second regime. For example, regime II takes place when
Uc>−4 KBT for
L = 5 µm and
v = 2 µm3 (volume per
microtubule). Under such conditions:where C is the total tubulin concentration,
and n is number of tubulin dimers per
µm of microtubule. In this regime the facilitated
diffusion leads to an increase of the diffusion rate to the MT extremities
with y
. The point is that the facilitated diffusion depends
weakly on L and depends linearly on free tubulin
concentration. However, when nL∼Cv, the free
tubulin concentration is very low and the association rate drops rapidly
with the mean MT length so that the mean MT length reaches a plateau value
(see Figure 9A).
Regime III, L≫λ and
strong attraction (2πaLey>v), see Text S3
for details
In this case, there is a sequestration effect of increasing the number of
adsorbed tubulin which reduce the pool of free GTP-tubulin concentration and
slow down association to the MT ends.The diffusion rate is now decreasing with the MT length and
with the attraction force (y).This model neglects the presence of oligomeric structures. Small oligomers
reduce the pool of free tubulin dimers and their diffusion is slower than
that of tubulin dimers, which slows the elongation rate. At low magnesium
concentrations, the effect of oligomerization is of little importance, as
recently shown [44] in the presence of 1 mM MgCl2,
but, at high polyamine concentrations (regime III), the
formation of tubulin aggregates or small oligomers may be favored (see Figure 3B). In the regime
III, in addition to the sequestration effect, the formation of multimeric
structures could thus lower the elongation rate of microtubules.To summarize the influence of facilitated diffusion on elongation, Figure 9A represents the
rate of GTP-tubulin arriving to the MT ends via facilitated diffusion versus
the microtubule length for four attraction energies,
(U). Facilitated diffusion can
increase significantly the flux of protein arriving to the MT ends for low
and moderate attractions (at L∼1 µm, there is
roughly a fourfold increase of J but is not beneficial for strong
attractions (Uc = −6
K. The flux of GTP-tubulin can be related to
the MT elongation rate by assuming that the supply of GTP-tubulin is the
rate limiting step for MT elongation. It is certainly a rough assumption,
though in agreement with experiments showing an increase of the elongation
with GTP-tubulin concentration [45], but it is
useful to decipher the possible influence of facilitated diffusion on
elongation. For example we expect that a strong attraction should induce
shorter MT since the flux of GTP-tubulin is significantly smaller for longer
MT in the regime III. We can even go a little further and plot the evolution
of the MT assembly curve versus time which only arbitrary takes into account
a differential elongation. To do so, we consider that stable nucleus are
already formed at t = 0
and are at the same concentration whatever the polyamine concentrations (see
Text
S4). These hypotheses allow us to observe the influence of elongation
only. Figure 9C shows
that facilitated elongation could potentially increase the plateau value and
the steepness of the assembly curve.In our simple analytical treatment, we neglect the high electric dipole
moment of tubulin heterodimers. Microtubules are indeed asymmetric and the
local electric field generated by tubulin dipoles should influence the
orientation of interacting dimers. Microtubule polarity is also known to
cause differential elongation rates between the plus (fast growing
end) and the minus ends (slow growing end). As
facilitated elongation proceeds via tubulin sliding on microtubules,
microtubule polarity may bias the random sliding with a preferential
direction. The relation between facilitated diffusion and local electric
fields on microtubule surface could then be an interesting subject of future
investigations.According to the model of facilitated diffusion to the MT ends (Figure 9), the light
scattering curves should reach their plateau value more abruptly in the
presence of polyamines. The experiments presented in Figure 7A clearly show that the plateau
value is reached quickly in the presence of polyamines. Therefore
facilitated diffusion seems to have a beneficial effect on MT elongation for
moderate attraction forces between tubulin dimers. However stronger
evidences are required to confirm this proposal of facilitated elongation.
We thus analyzed the pseudo-first order rate constant of elongation,
k. This parameter can be obtained by
measuring the slope of log
[1−(I(t)/I(∞)] as a
function of time [35]. Figure 10A shows that the pseudo-first
order rates of elongation increase about 3 times in the presence of 100
µM spermidine whatever the tubulin concentration (except
for 40 µM, the elongation rate is then lower than expected
without spermidine). In addition, we note that the pseudo-first
order rate constant of elongation increases with tubulin concentration in
the presence of spermidine, as predicted in Regime II.
Figure 10
Effect of spermidine on microtubule elongation.
(A) Pseudo-first order rate constant of elongation,
K, versus tubulin concentration
in buffer M. 100 µM spermidine significantly increases the
elongation rates whatever tubulin concentration. Inset:
Log-plot of
1−I(t)/I(∞) versus time for
30 µM tubulin. The slope of this curve is
−Kobs. The elongations rate is about three
times higher with spermidine (except for 40 µM
tubulin). (B) A microtubule solution was prepared by
incubating 30 µM tubulin at 37°c for 1h in 50 mM
MES-KOH pH 6.8, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 20%
glycerol, 1 mM GTP. At the end of the incubation, 50 µl of
a solution containing 30 µM of free tubulin dimers without
or with 100 µM spermidine was then added to 50
µl of the microtubule solution. The sudden increase of the
free tubulin concentration allows one to observe elongation of the
preformed microtubule via light scattering. It turns out that the
presence of 100 µM spermidine leads to a significant
increase of the elongation rate as indicated by the slope of the
assembly curve, which is 2.7 times higher with 100 µM
spermidine (see dotted lines). The plateau value
which is more rapidly reached in the presence of polyamines also
evidences a facilitated elongation.
Effect of spermidine on microtubule elongation.
(A) Pseudo-first order rate constant of elongation,
K, versus tubulin concentration
in buffer M. 100 µM spermidine significantly increases the
elongation rates whatever tubulin concentration. Inset:
Log-plot of
1−I(t)/I(∞) versus time for
30 µM tubulin. The slope of this curve is
−Kobs. The elongations rate is about three
times higher with spermidine (except for 40 µM
tubulin). (B) A microtubule solution was prepared by
incubating 30 µM tubulin at 37°c for 1h in 50 mM
MES-KOH pH 6.8, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 20%
glycerol, 1 mM GTP. At the end of the incubation, 50 µl of
a solution containing 30 µM of free tubulin dimers without
or with 100 µM spermidine was then added to 50
µl of the microtubule solution. The sudden increase of the
free tubulin concentration allows one to observe elongation of the
preformed microtubule via light scattering. It turns out that the
presence of 100 µM spermidine leads to a significant
increase of the elongation rate as indicated by the slope of the
assembly curve, which is 2.7 times higher with 100 µM
spermidine (see dotted lines). The plateau value
which is more rapidly reached in the presence of polyamines also
evidences a facilitated elongation.To more directly access to elongation and limit the influence of nucleation,
we measured the elongation rate of preformed microtubules by adding free
tubulin to a microtubule solution. Under such conditions, free tubulin will
mostly participate in the elongation of preformed microtubules due to the
sudden increase of the free tubulin concentration. If 100 µM
spermidine is added to the microtubule solution simultaneously with free
tubulin (see Figure
10B), the elongation rate is significantly increased compared to
control. In addition, the plateau value is reached more rapidly thus
indicating a rapid consumption of the free tubulin pool in agreement with
the model of facilitated diffusion to the MT ends.
Implication for MT stabilization
An attractive interaction mediated by polyamines may increase the flux of new
arriving GTP-tubulins to MT ends. The GTP cap should then be larger which in
turn favors microtubule stabilization. However, beyond this kinetic effect,
the MT structure would be more stable if an attraction force between tubulin
dimers could prevent microtubule depolymerization. During depolymerization,
the lateral bonds between dimers (−3.2 to −5.7
K) first dissociate because they are
significantly weaker than longitudinal bonds (−6.8 to
−9.4 K) [46]. To test if
the electrostatic interactions mediated by polyamines can influence the
depolymerization mechanism, we measured the rate of microtubule disassembly
at low temperature with or without spermidine and found that spermidine does
not significantly lower the rate of MT disassembly (see Figure 11). This suggests that polyamines
do not behave like stabilizing agents. A probable explanation for this is
that the roots of the C-terminal tails of two consecutive heterodimers in
the MT wall are separated from each other by a distance larger than 5 nm in
the lateral direction [47], which implies only very limited
possibility for the overlapping of two C-terminal tails and thus for
polyamine correlations to take place between two C-terminal tails. This
observation is thus in agreement with our theoretical conclusion.
Figure 11
Microtubule instability in the presence of polyamines.
To estimate the stability of microtubules, the time course of cold
disassembly at 8°C of pre-assembled microtubules (35
µM tubulin) is reported in the presence or
absence of 100 µM spermidine. The rate of disassembly is
not affected by the presence of 100 µM polyamines whereas
it is significantly reduced in the presence of 20 µM
taxol, a well known stabilizing agent. These results are thus in
agreement with our model since polyamines were not expected to
significantly favor microtubule stability and thus should preserve
microtubule dynamical instability.
Microtubule instability in the presence of polyamines.
To estimate the stability of microtubules, the time course of cold
disassembly at 8°C of pre-assembled microtubules (35
µM tubulin) is reported in the presence or
absence of 100 µM spermidine. The rate of disassembly is
not affected by the presence of 100 µM polyamines whereas
it is significantly reduced in the presence of 20 µM
taxol, a well known stabilizing agent. These results are thus in
agreement with our model since polyamines were not expected to
significantly favor microtubule stability and thus should preserve
microtubule dynamical instability.After incorporation in the MT wall, GTP-tubulin is hydrolyzed into its
inactive form, GDP-tubulin. As the presence of GTP-tubulin at the MT ends,
the “GTP cap”, is necessary to stabilize microtubules, a
sufficient supply of GTP-tubulin to the ends of growing MTs needs to be
maintained. In case of lack of GTP-tubulin supply, the GTP cap is then
hydrolyzed into GDP-tubulin, which increases the probability of shortening.
Microtubule shortening results in an important release of GDP-tubulin from
microtubule wall and, in this context, facilitated diffusion can play an
important role. For example, when a microtubule shrinks, the attraction on
its surface of its own GDP-tubulins may lower the probability of rescue.
Microtubule assembly in the presence of MAPs and polyamines
Microtubule associated protein regulates microtubule dynamics in
vivo and may thus inhibit the effect of polyamines on tubulin
polymerization. However, it was reported that polyamines can still enhance
tubulin polymerization in the presence of MAPs [48]. To further
document this report, we examined in vitro the effect of
polyamines at physiological concentrations on MAPs-microtubules and it
appears that they indeed enhance tubulin polymerization (Figure 12).
Figure 12
Influence of spermidine on MAPs-tubulin polymerization.
MAPs-tubulin (12 µM tubulin) was assembled
into microtubules as described in
and then the tubulin content was examined in the supernatant
(S) and the pellet (P) after
high speed centrifugations. A volume of cold PBS
(4°C) equal to that of supernatant was
added to pellet. 8 µL of each solution were loaded. The
addition of 200 µM spermidine increases the amount of
polymerized tubulin even in the presence of MAPs. Furthermore a
mixture of taxol and spermidine leads to an additional amount of
polymerized tubulin. (M) Molecular weight
markers.
Influence of spermidine on MAPs-tubulin polymerization.
MAPs-tubulin (12 µM tubulin) was assembled
into microtubules as described in
and then the tubulin content was examined in the supernatant
(S) and the pellet (P) after
high speed centrifugations. A volume of cold PBS
(4°C) equal to that of supernatant was
added to pellet. 8 µL of each solution were loaded. The
addition of 200 µM spermidine increases the amount of
polymerized tubulin even in the presence of MAPs. Furthermore a
mixture of taxol and spermidine leads to an additional amount of
polymerized tubulin. (M) Molecular weight
markers.As polyamines facilitate nucleation and elongation and do not stabilize MTs,
it is expected that the presence of a stabilizing agent
(taxol), polyamines should also further improve tubulin
assembly. We then observed the effect of spermidine on MAP-tubulin assembly
in the presence of taxol. It turns out that a mixture of taxol and
spermidine leads to a larger amount of polymerized tubulin than with taxol
alone, in agreement with a previous report [48]. However MAPs
are known to partly neutralize microtubules via their binding to the
C-terminal tails of tubulin heterodimers. MAPS can therefore lower the
attraction between tubulin dimers and microtubules mediated by polyamines.
Further studies are also needed to decipher how the presence of MAPs may
affect diffusion of free tubulin on microtubules.
Discussion
To describe microtubule assembly and dynamics in vitro, a simple
model with two phases, nucleation and elongation is generally advanced. Nucleation
proceeds via the assembly of several tubulin dimers into a nucleus of critical size
[33],[34]. The size of this
nucleus varies with the ionic composition of the buffer and the presence of tubulin
partners. Above this critical size, a short microtubule can be formed and then the
elongation of the microtubule takes place via the addition of free GTP-tubulin to
its extremities [33],[34],[36],[37], which
leads to the formation of a long MTs. The elongation phase is nearly completed when
the flow of new incoming GTP-tubulin is not sufficient to maintain the GTP cap at
the MT ends [45],[49],[50] and thus to prevent MT depolymerisation [45].The important point is that microtubule assembly requires the constant supply of
GTP-tubulin dimers via 3D diffusion to nucleus and MT ends. The rate of encounters
between tubulin dimers and a body of radius b0 (nucleus or MT
ends) is given by the well known Smoluchowski equation:
J
where D is the 3D diffusion constant of tubulin and
C0 is the concentration of free tubulin. Using
b
[51]
),
D and
C (measured in sea urchin egg extracts
[7]), we
obtain about 1500–3800 collisions per second. Such a high collision rate
via 3D diffusion is largely enough to sustain typical elongation rates (about
14 µm/min
[10],[51]). Indeed, there are about 1640 subunits per
µm of MT and, if we assume that both ends grow at the same rate, thus
neglecting treadmilling, the association rate of free GTP-tubulin to one end needs
to be only larger than 190 s−1 to maintain elongation [51]. It could
then be advanced that MT dynamics is not diffusion limited. However, this conclusion
is in apparent contradiction with several experimental evidences linking the
GTP-tubulin supply to the MT ends and the mean rate of elongation. First, upon
dilution, MTs collapse [52]. Second, near critical concentration, the
GTP-tubulin supply becomes so critical that elongation only compensate shortening
[45].
Third, the larger is the free tubulin concentration, the faster is the elongation
[45]
and the rate of tubulin nucleation also increases sharply with the free tubulin
concentration [33],[36]. One possible explanation for the discrepancy
between the calculated high collision rate and the high sensitivity of both
nucleation and MT elongation on free tubulin concentration is that the probability
for a new coming tubulin to dock correctly on its target site (lateral or
longitudinal bounds) is low [9] and thus requires
several collision trials. To add credit to this idea, theoretical and experimental
arguments have shown that an encounter can evolve into a stable complex only if the
two interacting biomolecules are correctly oriented and positioned, with respect to
theirs binding sites [8]. This geometrical constraint, which cannot be
neglected in the case of tubulin and microtubule, leads to an estimated probability
of complex formation per encounter 3 to 6 orders of magnitudes lower for typical
proteins, depending on the number of binding sites and their dimensions [6],[8]. Taking
into account this geometrical factor, the net tubulin association rate to the
nucleus or MT ends in the conditions described above would rather be between
0.0015–0.0038 and 1.5–3.8 s−1, which is not
sufficient to sustain MT assembly (190 s).
In this context, it is difficult to longer consider that MT assembly is not
diffusion limited since many more encounters need to occur to allow microtubule
elongation and the formation of critical nucleus. As an attraction between tubulin
dimers can be mediated by multivalent counterions, we propose that polyamines could
significantly increase the elongation and nucleation rates via facilitated diffusion
mechanisms.Facilitated diffusion increases the flow of free tubulin arriving at the MT ends
through tubulin sliding. As we can reasonably assume that a larger flow of tubulin
favors elongation, a significant increase of the elongation rate is then expected
under the best conditions for facilitated diffusion (see Figure 9A). Such theoretical predictions are in
close agreement with the experimental results presented in Figure 10. A threefold increase of the
pseudo-first order rate constant of elongation was measured experimentally with 100
µM spermidine. Such an increase could be critical in vivo
when tubulin supply is scarce. We also observed that the pseudo-first order rate
constant of elongation constantly increases with tubulin concentration in the
presence of spermidine. It indicates that microtubule ends are not saturated with
free tubulin and, therefore, elongation is still diffusion-limited in the presence
of polyamines. The elongation rate could then be further increased up to GTP-tubulin
saturation, which may arise at very high concentrations of tubulin.For the nucleation step, an attraction force mediated by polyamines induces a longer
interaction lifetime between a new incoming GTP-tubulin and the forming nucleus. In
agreement with this, experimental results clearly indicate that nucleation duration
in the presence of polyamines is significantly decreased compared to control (Figure 7), whereas, the critical
size of the nucleus may not be affected (Figure 8). Interestingly, the tenth time
(lag time of assembly) no longer decreases for tubulin
concentrations higher concentration than C
(∼20 µM, Figure 7B). This is an apparent discrepancy with
classical theory and with typical in vitro experiments as a slight
reduction of the pool of free tubulin increases the lag time by a dramatic factor
(Figure 7 and [33],[34],[36]). In contrast to elongation, the formation of a
stable nucleus is the result of many relatively stable intermediate aggregates [34].
During this slow process, free tubulin dimers could accumulate on growing nucleus in
the presence of polyamines. Consequently, the rate of nucleation no longer depends
on GTP-tubulin concentration because of over-supply. This results is in agreement
with in vivo reports from yeast showing that these cells do not
have very sensitive mechanisms to regulate their tubulin level (after a
two-fold reduction), and that such regulation was not necessary for
normal microtubule function [53]. The discrepancy between the necessity for a
close regulation of free tubulin in vitro and the apparent
independence of the nucleation rate on free tubulin level in vivo
could thus be partly explained by polyamines beside other nucleation factors such as
γ-tubulin [54]. The reciprocal consequence is that modulation of
the polyamine level should influence microtubule nucleation.Another interesting point raised by the present study is that polyamines do not
significantly stabilize microtubules (Figure 11). Indeed, polyamines participate to MT dynamics to both
enhance nucleation and the formation of long microtubules but, in the same time,
they do not prevent MT collapse which would have been toxic for living cells. The
absence of a significant stabilizing effect of polyamines on microtubules was at
first glance surprising; however it is most probably due to the fact that, in the MT
wall, the distance between the C-terminal tails of adjacent tubulin heterodimers is
too long to allow their significant overlapping.The model of facilitated diffusion provides basis to enlighten the interplay between
polyamines and microtubule dynamics in living cells. The polyamine levels vary
greatly during the cell cycle and in relation to the proliferation status of tissues
[14],[15],[17],[55], which may significantly impact microtubule
dynamics in living cells [15],[16],[56]. Indeed
it has been shown that polyamine concentrations increase significantly during
mitosis with a sequential patterns reflecting the fact that putrescine is a
precursor of spermidine and spermidine in turn is a precursor of spermine [15]. In
parallel to the increase of polyamines during mitosis, the rate of microtubule
nucleation also increases sharply during mitosis [57] to reach at anaphase a
sevenfold increase compared to that observed in the G2 phase. Our results suggest
that the increase of the polyamine content could support the increase of MT
nucleation and elongation. Against this proposal it could however be argued that
MAPs, which are known to neutralize the negative charge of microtubules and to
stabilize the microtubule wall, are such strong competitors for the microtubule
neutralization that they might inhibit the overall effects of polyamines. However
our results show that polyamines influence MT dynamics even in the presence of MAPs
(Figure 12). Interestingly
we also observed that the combination of taxol and spermidine cooperate to increase
the microtubule mass, which indicates that polyamines and taxol could use different
mechanisms (facilitated diffusion and stabilization, respectively).In summary, our results lead to the following conclusions:An attraction between two tubulin heterodimers is induced by the presence of
multivalent counterions due to their sharing between the highly negatively
charged C-terminal tails of tubulin. Under living cell conditions, this can
take place in the presence of natural polyamines (spermidine and
spermine).A moderate attraction force generated by polyamines enhances the rate of
GTP-tubulin arriving to the MT ends via facilitated diffusion and thus the
rate of microtubule elongation. Indeed, GTP-tubulin first proceeds through
3D diffusion to find the MT surface and then slides on the MT wall to reach
its extremities.Due to an electrostatic attraction, the microtubule nucleation process is
facilitated via an increase of the interaction lifetime between a new
incoming tubulin and the growing nucleus thus increasing the probability of
incorporation of tubulin in the nucleus. Above a critical concentration
C
, we observe that the
nucleation duration no longer decreases with the tubulin concentration.Polyamines seem to have little effect on MT stability which can be due to the
large distance between the C-terminal tails of tubulin inside the MT
wall.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals
Polyamines (putrescine, spermidine, spermine) were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification.
Tubulin Preparation
Tubulin was purified from sheep brain crude extracts as described previously
[58]. For long term storage, aliquots were stored at
−80°C in 50 mM MES-KOH pH 6.8, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM
EGTA, 0.25 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM GTP, 30% glycerol
(v/v). Before use, an additional cycle of polymerization
was performed in 50 mM MES-KOH pH 6.8, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM EGTA, 6 mM
MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.6 mM GTP, 30% glycerol.
Microtubules were sedimented by centrifugation (52,000×g, 30
min at 37°C) at the end of which the microtubule pellet was
resuspended in 25 mM MES-KOH pH 6.8, 0.5 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT and disassembled at
4°C for 20 minutes. Tubulin aggregates were finally eliminated by a
further centrifugation at 4°C (52,000×g, 20
min). Tubulin concentration was determined by spectrophotometry using
an extinction coefficient of 1.2
mg−1×cm2 at 278 nm [59].
Microtubule Assembly
Pure tubulin was pre-incubated on ice for 2 min in buffer M (25 mM
MES-KOH pH 6.8, 20% glycerol, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl) in the presence or absence of various concentrations of
polyamines. For Figures 4
and 5, tubulin
polymerization was initiated by placing the ice-cold cuvette (1 cm light
path) at 37°C in a PTI QuantaMaster 2000-4 thermostated
spectrofluorimeter. The kinetics of microtubule assembly was then immediately
monitored by 90° light scattering at 370 nm. For Figures 7, 8, and 10, the tubulin samples were immediately
placed in a pre-warmed cuvette (time
t = 0) to capture the kinetics of
nucleation and elongation. This eliminates the time necessary for heating the
cuvette in the spectrofluorometer.
Preparation of S-Tubulin
S-tubulin was prepared as previously described [60]. Briefly,
subtilisin was added to tubulin with a 1∶200
subtilisin∶tubulin (w/w ratio). The mixture was then
incubated for 40 min at 25°C. In these conditions, about 95 %
of tubulin was correctly cleaved by subtilisin as determined by gel
electrophoresis (percentage of cleavage) and MALDI-TOF mass
spectrometry (mass of cleaved tubulin). Aliquots of S-tubulin were used fresh or
kept frozen in 25 mM MES-KOH pH 6.8, 1 mM EGTA, 10% glycerol.
Effects of Polyamines on Tubulin Assembly by Sedimentation Assay
12 µM of pure tubulin was pre-incubated on ice for 2 min in (25
mM MES-KOH pH 6.8, 20% glycerol, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM
MgCl with various concentrations of KCl
and spermidine (as indicated). Tubulin assembly was obtained after incubation at
37°C for 20 min. Microtubules were then pelleted at 25,000×g
for 15 min at 37 °C and resuspended in 25 mM MES-KOH at 4°C in a
volume equivalent to that of the supernatant. Equal volumes of supernatant and
resuspended pellet were loaded on SDS-PAGE.
Cosedimentation Assay To Detect Tubulin Dimer/Microtubule Interaction
To analyze the attraction of Cy3-tubulin on microtubules, Cy3-tubulin was
prepared as described previously to obtain 0.5 Cy3 molecules per tubulin dimer
[61]. Non fluorescent microtubules were preassembled
in the presence taxol and then pelleted at low speed (20,000×g for 10
min). The pellet was washed several times to remove free taxol. After
resuspension in buffer M without GTP, taxol-stabilized microtubules (4
µM of polymerized tubulin) were then allowed to interact
with 0.3 µM of Cy3-tubulin at various concentrations of spermidine.
100 µl of the reaction solutions were centrifuged at
20,000×g for 10 min to pellet MTs and MT-adsorbed Cy3-tubulin. Pellets
were resuspended in the starting volume. Fluorescence intensities of pellets and
supernatants were then measured using a PTI QuantaMaster 2000-4 thermostated
spectrofluorimeter
(λexcitation = 550 nm,
λemission = 569 nm).
Effects of Spermidine and Taxol on MAPs-Tubulin Assembly Determined by
Sedimentation
1.4 mg/ml of twice cycled tubulin containing 15% of MAPs was incubated
5 min on ice in 25 mM MES-KOH pH 6.8, 5 mM MgSO4, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM
GTP, 0.7 mM ATP, 1 mM DTT with or without 200 µM spermidine or/and 5
µM taxol. The samples were then placed at 37°C for 15 min.
Microtubules were then pelleted at 25,000×g for 15 min. Pellets and
supernatants were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
AFM Imaging
Microtubules samples from assembly reaction (in buffer M) were
directly deposited on NiCl2 pretreated mica surfaces. Samples were
deposited on the mica surface for a short time of about 30 s to prevent
microtubules from collapsing on the surface as previously reported [62].
Finally, the surface was then dried with filter paper.AFM imaging was performed in intermittent mode. We used silicon cantilevers
AC160TS (Olympus) with resonance frequencies of about 300 kHz.
All images were collected at a scan frequency of 1.5 Hz and a resolution of
512×512 pixels. A first or second order polynomial function was used
to remove the background slope.Attraction of fluorescent tubulin dimers onto microtubule mediated by
spermidine. Fluorescence microscopy of a non fluorescent MT pellet in the
presence of 0.1 µM Cy3-tubulin in buffer M without GTP. i)
Microtubule pellet alone; ii) 0.1 µM of Cy3-tubulin was allowed to
interact with the microtubule pellet for 15 min; iii) Addition of 200
µM spermidine (15 min); iv) Addition of 300 mM NaCl (30 min).
Following the addition of spermidine, we observe the apparition of the
microtubule pellet in the fluorescence image. The signal to background ratio
due to Cy3-tubulin attraction in the pellet is about 13% under
such condition, as shown in the line profile of fluorescent intensity. As
expected for an electrostatic interaction, Cy3-tubulin was partly released
from the microtubule pellet upon the addition of NaCl up to 300 mM.(0.16 MB TIF)Click here for additional data file.Log-log plot of the tenth time versus plateau value of the assembly curve
extracted from Figure
7A. In the absence of polyamines, a straight line properly fits the
experimental data. Its slope is about −3 in agreement with the
results of Flyvbjerg et al [34]. This
scaling properties is however not valid in the presence of spermidine.(0.02 MB TIF)Click here for additional data file.Attraction between tubulin dimers(0.05 MB DOC)Click here for additional data file.Competition between cations(0.03 MB DOC)Click here for additional data file.Facilitated diffusion(0.04 MB DOC)Click here for additional data file.Polymeric tubulin concentration(0.02 MB DOC)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Julien Lefèvre; Konstantin G Chernov; Vandana Joshi; Stéphanie Delga; Flavio Toma; David Pastré; Patrick A Curmi; Philippe Savarin Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2010-11-09 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Carlo A Ghisalberti; Rosa M Borzì; Silvia Cetrullo; Flavio Flamigni; Gaetano Cairo Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 5.810