Literature DB >> 19118422

Prognostic significance of endoscopic ultrasound-defined pleural, pericardial or peritoneal fluid in oesophageal cancer.

Christopher P Twine1, Jonathan D Barry, Guy R J Blackshaw, Tom D Crosby, S Ashley Roberts, Wyn G Lewis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is known to detect smaller effusion volumes than computerised tomography (CT), yet the outcomes for patients diagnosed with oesophageal carcinoma and EUS-defined pleural, pericardial or ascitic fluid effusions (EDFE) are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of multidisciplinary stage directed treatment for such patients.
METHODS: Forty-nine (9.2%) out of a consecutive 527 patients diagnosed with oesophageal cancer from a single regional upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer network were found to have evidence of EDFE undetected by CT. Thirty-nine (79.6%) patients had pleural effusions, eight (16.3%) pericardial effusions, and two (4.1%) ascites.
RESULTS: Twelve (24.4%) underwent surgery, 3 (6.1%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy without subsequent surgery, 12 (24.5%) received definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT), and 22 (44.9%) received palliative treatment. Survival in patients with EDFE was significantly shorter (median and 2-year survival 15.6 months and 24%, respectively) when compared with patients without EDFE (26.7 months and 40%, respectively, p = 0.001), and was unrelated to EDFE type (p = 0.192). Two-year survival after oesophagectomy with or without neoadjuvant therapy was 45% in patients with EDFE compared with 42% in patients without EDFE (p = 0.668).
CONCLUSIONS: EDFE was an important adverse prognostic indicator, but patients deemed to have operable tumours should still be treated with radical intent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19118422     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0286-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  27 in total

Review 1.  Esophageal cancer staging: the role of radiology.

Authors:  Francesco Maria Caputo; Grazia Loretta Buquicchio
Journal:  Rays       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec

2.  Oesophagectomy practice and outcomes in England.

Authors:  A A Al-Sarira; G David; S Willmott; J P Slavin; M Deakin; D J Corless
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Preoperative noninvasive EUS evaluation in patients with esophageal cancer considered for esophagectomy.

Authors:  Cristian Gheorghe; Codrut Stanescu; Liana Gheorghe; Ion Bancila; Vlad Herlea; Gabriel Becheanu; Daniela Voinea; Razvan Iacob; Ioana Lupescu; Rodica Anghel; Adina Croitoru; Irinel Popescu
Journal:  J Gastrointestin Liver Dis       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.008

4.  Endosonographic staging of 100 consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma: introduction of the 8-mm esophagoprobe.

Authors:  D J Bowrey; G W Clark; S A Roberts; T S Maughan; A B Hawthorne; G T Williams; P D Carey
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 5.  A systematic review of the staging performance of endoscopic ultrasound in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  S Kelly; K M Harris; E Berry; J Hutton; P Roderick; J Cullingworth; L Gathercole; M A Smith
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  EUS-guided paracentesis for the diagnosis of malignant ascites.

Authors:  Neeraj Kaushik; Asif Khalid; Debra Brody; Kevin McGrath
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Endoscopic ultrasound errors in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Gregory Zuccaro; Thomas W Rice; John J Vargo; John R Goldblum; Lisa A Rybicki; John A Dumot; David J Adelstein; Patricia A Trolli; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Prospective cohort comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  M A Morgan; W G Lewis; T D L Crosby; X Escofet; S A Roberts; A E Brewster; T J Harvard; G W B Clark
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Prospective comparison of transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy following neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  M A Morgan; W G Lewis; A N Hopper; X Escofet; T J Havard; A E Brewster; T D L Crosby; S A Roberts; G W B Clark
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.429

10.  Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  O A Khan; J J Fitzgerald; I Soomro; F D Beggs; W E Morgan; J P Duffy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-05-19       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  An automated spring-loaded needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided abdominal paracentesis in cancer patients.

Authors:  Rei Suzuki; Atsushi Irisawa; Manoop S Bhutani; Takuto Hikichi; Tadayuki Takagi; Goro Shibukawa; Ai Sato; Masaki Sato; Tsunehiko Ikeda; Ko Watanabe; Jun Nakamura; Srinadh Annangi; Kazuhiro Tasaki; Katsutoshi Obara; Hiromasa Ohira
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-02-16

2.  Endoscopic ultrasound and paracentesis in the evaluation of small volume ascites in patients with intra-abdominal malignancies.

Authors:  Marissa M Montgomery; I Michael Leitman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transesophageal thoracentesis for minimal pleural effusion.

Authors:  Surinder Singh Rana; Ravi Sharma; Rajesh Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.