Literature DB >> 17509119

Prospective comparison of transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy following neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer.

M A Morgan1, W G Lewis, A N Hopper, X Escofet, T J Havard, A E Brewster, T D L Crosby, S A Roberts, G W B Clark.   

Abstract

Transthoracic esophagectomy (TT) has been championed as a better cancer operation than transhiatal esophagectomy (TH) because the approach facilitates meticulous wide tumor excision and lymphadenectomy. However, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRTS) and chemotherapy (CS) have been reported to improve outcomes, and we aimed to compare outcomes after multimodal therapy related to the operative approach. One hundred and fifty-one consecutive patients were studied prospectively. All patients were staged with computed tomography and endoluminal ultrasound, and treatment decisions were related to stage and performance status. One hundred and nineteen TT (median age 58 years, 92 male, 54 CRTS, 65 CS) were performed compared to 32 TH (median age 57 year, 27 male, 14 CRTS, 18 CS). Primary outcome measure was survival. Post-operative morbidity and mortality were 54% and 4%, respectively, after TT compared with 59% and 6% after TH (chi2 0.239 df 1, P=0.625). Recurrent cancer was no less frequent after TT (52%) than after TH (37.5%, chi2 2.151 df=1, P=0.142). Cumulative uncorrected 5-year survival was 34% after TT compared with 53% after TH (log rank 1.44, df=1, P=0.2298). Median survival was also similar in lymph node positive patients (TT vs. TH, 23 months vs. 22 months, respectively, log rank 0.25, df=1, P=0.6199). Despite the fact that patients receiving multimodal therapy and a TH esophagectomy were less fit, operative morbidity, mortality and recurrence were similar, and survival did not differ significantly when compared with multimodal TT esophagectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17509119     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00676.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  6 in total

Review 1.  Neoadjuvant therapy for advanced esophageal cancer: the impact on surgical management.

Authors:  Masahiko Ikebe; Masaru Morita; Manabu Yamamoto; Yasushi Toh
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-05-10

2.  Prospective comparison of optic versus blind endoscopic ultrasound in staging esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Christopher P Twine; Wyn G Lewis; Xavier Escofet; David Bosanquet; S Ashley Roberts
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Proposed follow up programme after curative resection for lower third oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  L H Moyes; J E Anderson; M J Forshaw
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  Prognostic significance of endoscopic ultrasound-defined pleural, pericardial or peritoneal fluid in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Christopher P Twine; Jonathan D Barry; Guy R J Blackshaw; Tom D Crosby; S Ashley Roberts; Wyn G Lewis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Zero leaks with minimally invasive esophagectomy: a team-based approach.

Authors:  Amit Khithani; John Jay; Christos Galanopoulos; David Curtis; Allison Vo; D Rohan Jeyarajah
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis after resection of esophageal cancer: a matched pair analysis of 72 patients in a single center study.

Authors:  Christian D Klink; Marcel Binnebösel; Jens Otto; Gabriele Boehm; Klaus T von Trotha; Ralf-Dieter Hilgers; Joachim Conze; Ulf P Neumann; Marc Jansen
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 2.754

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.