Literature DB >> 10770359

Endosonographic staging of 100 consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma: introduction of the 8-mm esophagoprobe.

D J Bowrey1, G W Clark, S A Roberts, T S Maughan, A B Hawthorne, G T Williams, P D Carey.   

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound of esophageal carcinoma is conventionally performed using the 13-mm fiberoptic/ultrasound echoendoscope. However, the large diameter results in an inability to negotiate the primary tumor in 25% of patients. The aim of this study was first to determine whether use of the 8-mm esophagoprobe would overcome this problem and second to evaluate the accuracy of the smaller diameter instrument. One hundred consecutive patients with esophageal cancer underwent initial gastroscopy. Based upon the degree of luminal stenosis, patients were staged with either the conventional echoendoscope (luminal diameter > or = 15 mm) or the esophagoprobe (luminal diameter < 15 mm). The primary tumor was successfully negotiated in all subjects (echoendoscope 30, esophagoprobe 70) so that T- and N-staging was accomplished in every patient. Esophageal dilatation was performed in 12 patients (12%). The procedure was well tolerated and there were no complications, in particular no patient suffered esophageal perforation. The accuracy of the esophagoprobe for T-staging was 90% (19 out of 20) and that for N-staging was 75% (15 out of 20). This was similar to the accuracy of staging with the conventional echoendoscope, 90% (9 out of 10) for T-stage and 90% (9 out of 10) for N-stage. The esophagoprobe can safely and accurately stage patients with esophageal carcinoma, including those with high-grade stenoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10770359     DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2050.1999.00071.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  10 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of distal and celiac axis lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas R Puli; Jyotsna B K Reddy; Matthew L Bechtold; Mainor R Antillon; Jamal A Ibdah
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas-R Puli; Jyotsna-Bk Reddy; Matthew-L Bechtold; Daphne Antillon; Jamal-A Ibdah; Mainor-R Antillon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Endoscopic ultrasound: it's accuracy in evaluating mediastinal lymphadenopathy? A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas-R Puli; Jyotsna Batapati Krishna Reddy; Matthew-L Bechtold; Jamal-A Ibdah; Daphne Antillon; Shailender Singh; Mojtaba Olyaee; Mainor-R Antillon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Prognostic significance of endoluminal ultrasound-defined disease length and tumor volume (EDTV) for patients with the diagnosis of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Christopher P Twine; S Ashley Roberts; Wyn G Lewis; B Vicki Dave; Claire E Rawlinson; David Chan; Mark Robinson; Tom D Crosby
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Prospective comparison of the perceived preoperative computed tomographic, endosonographic and histopathological stage of oesophageal cancer related to body mass indices.

Authors:  Christopher P Twine; S Ashley Roberts; Jonathan D Barry; Huw Oliphant; Matthew A Morgan; Guy R J Blackshaw; Wyn G Lewis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Prospective comparison of optic versus blind endoscopic ultrasound in staging esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Christopher P Twine; Wyn G Lewis; Xavier Escofet; David Bosanquet; S Ashley Roberts
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Prognostic significance of endoscopic ultrasound-defined pleural, pericardial or peritoneal fluid in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Christopher P Twine; Jonathan D Barry; Guy R J Blackshaw; Tom D Crosby; S Ashley Roberts; Wyn G Lewis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The preferred choice for radial endosonographic staging of esophageal cancer: standard echoendoscope or nonoptic esophagoprobe?

Authors:  C Vu; S Tsang; L Doig; J Meenan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Staging investigations for oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E P M van Vliet; M H Heijenbrok-Kal; M G M Hunink; E J Kuipers; P D Siersema
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Endobronchial ultrasound application for diagnosis of tracheobronchial tree invasion by esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Teresa Garrido; Fauze Maluf-Filho; Rubens A A Sallum; Viviane Rossi Figueiredo; Márcia Jacomelli; Miguel Tedde
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.