BACKGROUND: EUS and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) have well-defined roles in the diagnosis and staging of GI and pancreaticobiliary malignancy. Malignant ascites usually represents peritoneal carcinomatosis, increases disease stage, and portends a poor prognosis. There are limited data regarding the yield of EUS-guided paracentesis (EUS-P) for the diagnosis of malignant ascites. OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of EUS-P for the diagnosis of malignant ascites. DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary referral academic center. PATIENTS: Those presenting for EUS examination for suspected or proven malignancy over a 16-month period were evaluated prospectively for the presence of ascites. INTERVENTIONS: EUS-P was performed via a transgastric or transduodenal approach if ascites was detected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of EUS-P for diagnosing malignant ascites. RESULTS: Six hundred twenty-nine patients were studied. Twenty-five patients with ascites who met inclusion criteria comprised the study cohort. The mean volume of ascites aspirated was 6.8 mL (range, 1-20 mL). Sixty-four percent (16 of 25) of EUS-P samples revealed malignant cytology. Of the group with negative ascitic cytology, 67% (6 of 9) had a proven malignancy. There was one false-negative cytology result. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of EUS-P for diagnosing malignant ascites was 94%, 100%, 100%, and 89%, respectively. The complication rate was 4%; 1 patient developed bacterial peritonitis after EUS-P. LIMITATIONS: The study did not address cost savings in patient care based on the diagnosis of malignant ascites. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-P is highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing malignant ascites. The finding of malignant ascites significantly alters patient management, so an active search for ascites and use of EUS-P should be incorporated into the diagnosis and staging of upper GI and pancreaticobiliary malignancy.
BACKGROUND: EUS and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) have well-defined roles in the diagnosis and staging of GI and pancreaticobiliary malignancy. Malignant ascites usually represents peritoneal carcinomatosis, increases disease stage, and portends a poor prognosis. There are limited data regarding the yield of EUS-guided paracentesis (EUS-P) for the diagnosis of malignant ascites. OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of EUS-P for the diagnosis of malignant ascites. DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary referral academic center. PATIENTS: Those presenting for EUS examination for suspected or proven malignancy over a 16-month period were evaluated prospectively for the presence of ascites. INTERVENTIONS:EUS-P was performed via a transgastric or transduodenal approach if ascites was detected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of EUS-P for diagnosing malignant ascites. RESULTS: Six hundred twenty-nine patients were studied. Twenty-five patients with ascites who met inclusion criteria comprised the study cohort. The mean volume of ascites aspirated was 6.8 mL (range, 1-20 mL). Sixty-four percent (16 of 25) of EUS-P samples revealed malignant cytology. Of the group with negative ascitic cytology, 67% (6 of 9) had a proven malignancy. There was one false-negative cytology result. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of EUS-P for diagnosing malignant ascites was 94%, 100%, 100%, and 89%, respectively. The complication rate was 4%; 1 patient developed bacterial peritonitis after EUS-P. LIMITATIONS: The study did not address cost savings in patient care based on the diagnosis of malignant ascites. CONCLUSIONS:EUS-P is highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing malignant ascites. The finding of malignant ascites significantly alters patient management, so an active search for ascites and use of EUS-P should be incorporated into the diagnosis and staging of upper GI and pancreaticobiliary malignancy.
Authors: Nathaniel S Rial; Kevin B Gilchrist; Jeff T Henderson; Achyut K Bhattacharyya; Thomas D Boyer; Abdul Nadir; John T Cunningham Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2011-06-16
Authors: Nathaniel S Rial; Jeff T Henderson; Achyut K Bhattacharyya; Abdul Nadir; John T Cunningham Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2010-12-16
Authors: Christian Jenssen; Maria Victoria Alvarez-Sánchez; Bertrand Napoléon; Siegbert Faiss Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Christopher P Twine; Jonathan D Barry; Guy R J Blackshaw; Tom D Crosby; S Ashley Roberts; Wyn G Lewis Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 4.584