Literature DB >> 19116302

Assessing caregivers for team interventions (ACT): a new paradigm for comprehensive hospice quality care.

George Demiris1, Debra Parker Oliver, Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles.   

Abstract

This article provides a framework labeled ACT that aims to successfully integrate family caregivers and patients into one unit of care, as dictated by the hospice philosophy. ACT (assessing caregivers for team interventions) is based on the ongoing assessment of the caregiver background context, primary, secondary, and intrapsychic stressors as well as outcomes of the caregiving experience and subsequently, the design and delivery of appropriate interventions to be delivered by the hospice interdisciplinary team. Interventions have to be tailored to a caregiver's individual needs; such a comprehensive needs assessment allows teams to customize interventions recognizing that most needs and challenges cannot be met by only one health care professional or only one discipline. The proposed model ensures a holistic approach to address the multifaceted challenges of the caregiving experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19116302      PMCID: PMC2666779          DOI: 10.1177/1049909108328697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care        ISSN: 1049-9091            Impact factor:   2.500


  30 in total

1.  Symptom burden at the end of life: hospice providers' perceptions.

Authors:  J S Kutner; C T Kassner; D E Nowels
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Factors influencing outcomes for family caregivers of persons receiving palliative care: toward an integrated model.

Authors:  G Kinsella; B Cooper; C Picton; D Murtagh
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.250

3.  Medicare program; hospice care--final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1983-12-16

4.  Hospice family caregivers: an experience in coping.

Authors:  S V Brinson; Q Brunk
Journal:  Hosp J       Date:  2000

5.  Understanding economic and other burdens of terminal illness: the experience of patients and their caregivers.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; D L Fairclough; J Slutsman; L L Emanuel
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-03-21       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  The relationships between family primary caregiver characteristics and satisfaction with hospice care, quality of life, and burden.

Authors:  J L Meyers; L N Gray
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers.

Authors:  K E Steinhauser; N A Christakis; E C Clipp; M McNeilly; L McIntyre; J A Tulsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Concerns of hospice patient caregivers.

Authors:  Marguerite Newton; Doris Bell; Sharon Lambert; Arleen Fearing
Journal:  ABNF J       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec

9.  Patient and family involvement in hospice interdisciplinary teams.

Authors:  Debra Parker Oliver; Davina Porock; George Demiris; Karen Courtney
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.250

10.  A study of information flow in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings.

Authors:  George Demiris; Karla Washington; Debra Parker Oliver; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.338

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Innovative Tools to Support Family Caregivers of Persons with Cancer: The Role of Information Technology.

Authors:  George Demiris; Karla Washington; Connie M Ulrich; Mihail Popescu; Debra Parker Oliver
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.315

2.  Exploring the collective hospice caregiving experience.

Authors:  Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Robin L Kruse; Debra Parker Oliver; George Demiris; Greg Petroski
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Integrating Family Caregivers of People With Alzheimer's Disease and Dementias into Clinical Appointments: Identifying Potential Best Practices.

Authors:  Joan M Griffin; Catherine Riffin; Rachel D Havyer; Virginia S Biggar; Meryl Comer; Theresa L Frangiosa; Lauren R Bangerter
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2019-10-11

4.  The lack of standard definitions in the supportive and palliative oncology literature.

Authors:  David Hui; Masanori Mori; Henrique A Parsons; Sun Hyun Kim; Zhijun Li; Shamsha Damani; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Reciprocal suffering: caregiver concerns during hospice care.

Authors:  Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; George Demiris; Debra Parker Oliver; Stephanie Burt
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Technologies to support end-of-life care.

Authors:  George Demiris; Debra Parker Oliver; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.315

7.  The Prevalence and Risks for Depression and Anxiety in Hospice Caregivers.

Authors:  Debra Parker Oliver; Karla Washington; Jamie Smith; Aisha Uraizee; George Demiris
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  Stress variances among informal hospice caregivers.

Authors:  Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; George Demiris; Debra Parker Oliver; Karla Washington; Stephanie Burt; Sara Shaunfield
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2012-06-06

9.  Reaction to Caregiving by Hospice Caregivers Upon Enrollment.

Authors:  David L Albright; Debra Parker Oliver; George Demiris
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 10.  Development of a set of process and structure indicators for palliative care: the Europall project.

Authors:  Kathrin Woitha; Karen Van Beek; Nisar Ahmed; Jeroen Hasselaar; Jean-Marc Mollard; Isabelle Colombet; Lukas Radbruch; Kris Vissers; Yvonne Engels
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.