Literature DB >> 23122255

Development of a set of process and structure indicators for palliative care: the Europall project.

Kathrin Woitha1, Karen Van Beek, Nisar Ahmed, Jeroen Hasselaar, Jean-Marc Mollard, Isabelle Colombet, Lukas Radbruch, Kris Vissers, Yvonne Engels.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: By measuring the quality of the organisation of palliative care with process and structure quality indicators (QIs), patients, caregivers and policy makers are able to monitor to what extent recommendations are met, like those of the council of the WHO on palliative care and guidelines. This will support the implementation of public programmes, and will enable comparisons between organisations or countries.
METHODS: As no European set of indicators for the organisation of palliative care existed, such a set of QIs was developed. An update of a previous systematic review was made and extended with more databases and grey literature. In two project meetings with practitioners and experts in palliative care the development process of a QI set was finalised and the QIs were categorized in a framework, covering the recommendations of the Council of Europe.
RESULTS: The searches resulted in 151 structure and process indicators, which were discussed in steering group meetings. Of those QIs, 110 were eligible for the final framework.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed the first set of QIs for the organisation of palliative care. This article is the first step in a multi step project to identify, validate and pilot QIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23122255      PMCID: PMC3529116          DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1472-6963            Impact factor:   2.655


Background

Following the 2002 definition of the World Health Organisation (WHO), palliative care is no longer restricted to patients with cancer; it should be available for all patients with life-threatening diseases [1]. Furthermore, palliative care is applicable early in the course of the disease and can be delivered in conjunction with interventions that aim to prolong life. Palliative care needs a team approach in order to relieve not only pain and other somatic symptoms but also to provide multi-dimensional care including psychosocial and spiritual care and support for patients and their proxies. This wider definition implies an increase of the number of patients eligible for palliative care. Due to successful medical interventions, the aging population and improved survival of patients with chronic diseases or with cancer, the demand for palliative care will increase too [2,3]. In 2003, the Council of Europe launched recommendations for the organisation of palliative care regarding settings and services, policy and organisation, quality improvement and research, education and training, family, communication with the patient and family, teams and bereavement. This included further cooperation between European countries [4]. As most scientific studies focus on clinical outcomes, it is unclear whether these recommendations and the WHO definition have been implemented in the organisation of palliative care in Europe. By measuring the quality of the organisation of palliative care, patients, caregivers and policy makers can monitor whether in their country, specific settings and networks for palliative care meet the recommendations of the council of Europe and of the WHO. This information would give better insight, which is needed for the measurement of the impact of palliative care programs [5]. A valid and reliable method for assessing the quality of the organisation of care is the use of structure and process quality indicators (QIs). QIs are ‘explicitly defined and measurable items referring to the outcomes, processes or structure of care’ [6,7]. In a systematic review published in 2009, clinical indicators appeared to be widely overrepresented over indicators that assess organisational issues of palliative care, and most QIs were developed in and for one specific country or setting [8]. Therefore, we aimed to develop a scientifically sound European set of structure and process QIs, as a first step in quality measurement and improvement.

Methods

The study, undertaken by partners from seven collaborating countries (Belgium, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Netherlands, Poland and Spain), ran from October 2007 till September 2010 [9]. It was co-funded by the European Executive Agency for Health and Consumers (EAHC). QI sets can be based on existing sets of QIs, recommendations from clinical guidelines, scientific literature, best practice or expert consensus [6]. We used a combination of these. As palliative care, being a relatively young field within health care is changing rapidly. The initial phase of this project was an update and extension of a previous review aiming to find already existing QIs in literature or aspects of the organisation of the palliative care for which QIs would be useful [8]. QIs were operationalized as ‘measurable items referring to the outcomes, processes or structure of care’ [6,7]. Organisation of palliative care was defined as ‘systems to enable the delivery of good quality in palliative care’, which made us focus on processes and structures [7]. Besides publications that describe the development or use of QIs for the organisation of palliative care, publications were used that describe the structure or process of good palliative care, in order to develop QIs if not available yet.

Main database search

As an update and extension of an existing systematic review, the following bibliographic databases were searched: Medline, Scopus, PsycINFO, Social Medicine, CINAHL, the Cochrane Database, Embase, SIGLE, ASCO, and Google Scholar by an existing search strategy (Additional file 1: Appendix A) [8]. If applicable, Mesh terms were changed, as these are database-specific. Inclusion criteria were a publication period from December 2007 to May 2009, as the systematic review ran until December 2007 and containing information about the development or use of (sets of) QIs. Papers describing QIs about palliative care for children, clinical outcome indicators, patient outcome and on treatment were excluded, as well as scientific papers that were not written in English. The initial selection process was based on independent screening by three researchers of title and/or abstract, followed by a selection based on full text. Additionally, reference lists of obtained papers were studied and hand searches were performed (Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Palliative Medicine and Quality and Safety in Health Care Journal). The QIs derived from the search were categorized in a framework. It was based on (1) a previously developed framework for evalution of the organisation of general practice and adapted for palliative care and (2) the recommendations of the Council of Europe [4,10]. It contains the domains 1. Definition of a palliative care service, 2. Access to palliative care, 3. Infrastructure, 4. Assessment tools, 5. Personnel, 6. Documentation of clinical data, 7. Quality and safety issues, 8. Reporting clinical activity of palliative care, 9. Research and 10. Eduation.

Grey literature search

If a domain or subdomain of the framework was not covered with QIs found in the literature search, an additional grey literature search was performed. Grey literature was defined as ‘literature which has not been formally published in peer- reviewed literature’ [11]. Inclusion of grey literature was restricted to reports from government agencies or scientific research groups, white papers and websites from national organisations of the seven participating countries. Finally, the network of the Europall research group was used to identify relevant papers.

Methods of screening and article selection

The steering group of the Europall project planned two meetings in September and October 2009 with all project members (Additional file 1: Appendix B).

QI selection

The draft set of structure and process QIs was discussed during the first steering group meeting in September 2009. Academic experts from several disciplines in palliative care, all from one of the seven participating European countries were invited. Consensus was based on 1. whether it considered a process or structure QI 2. whether it overlapped with other proposed QIs, 3. to which domain of the framework (Table  1) it belonged [10] and 4. for which settings it was applicable. Based on the grey literature search, the project partners could suggest new QIs about aspects that were relevant but not yet operationalised as QIs.
Table 1

Quality indicator set

Definition of a palliative care service
1
All the services below are part of a comprehensive palliative care service: Palliative day care, Palliative home care support team, Hospice beds, Palliative hospital support team, Inpatient palliative care hospital beds, Palliative care outpatient clinic, Bereavement support
Structure indicator
All settings
New developed
2
All the services below are part of a comprehensive palliative care service: Palliative day care
Structure indicator
All settings
New developed
3
All the services below are part of a comprehensive palliative care service: Palliative home care support team
Structure indicator
All settings
New developed
4
All the services below are part of a comprehensive palliative care service: Hospice beds
Structure indicator
All settings
New developed
5
All the services below are part of a comprehensive palliative care service: Palliative hospital support team
Structure indicator
All settings
New developed
6
All the services below are part of a comprehensive palliative care service: Inpatient palliative care hospital beds (e.g. palliative care unit)
Structure indicator
All settings
New developed
7
All the services below are part of a comprehensive palliative care service: Palliative care outpatient clinic
Structure indicator
All settings
New developed
8
All the services below are part of a comprehensive palliative care service: Bereavement support
Structure indicator
All settings
New developed
Access to palliative care
A. Access and availability (All settings)
9
A palliative care team is available at the request of the treating professional/team in all of the following settings: Day care, at home, Hospital, Hospice, Nursing home, Outpatient clinic, Day care
Process indicator
All settings
New developed
10
A palliative care team is available at the request of the treating professional/team in all of the following settings: Day care (excluding palliative day care)
Process indicator
All settings
New developed
11
A palliative care team is available at the request of the treating professional/team in all of the following settings: At home (or home replacing institution s.a mental institution, prison)
Process indicator
All settings
New developed
12
A palliative care team is available at the request of the treating professional/team in all of the following settings: Hospital
Process indicator
All settings
New developed
13
A palliative care team is available at the request of the treating professional/team in all of the following settings: Hospice
Process indicator
All settings
New developed
14
A palliative care team is available at the request of the treating professional/team in all of the following settings: Care home
Process indicator
All settings
New developed
15
A palliative care team is available at the request of the treating professional/team in all of the following settings: Outpatient clinic (excluding palliative care outpatient clinic)
Process indicator
All settings
New developed
16
For every professional/team specialised palliative care advice is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
17
Patients in need of palliative care and their families have access to palliative care facilities: Throughout the entire duration of their disease
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
18
Patients in need of palliative care and their families have access to palliative care facilities: With no extra financial consequences for the patient
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
19
Patients receiving palliative care have access to diagnostic investigations (e.g. X-rays, blood samples) regardless of their setting
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
Primary care (Home, Nursing home)
20
Palliative care is available for the patient and their family by:Phone
Process indicator
Primary care indicator
Changed
21
Palliative care is available for the patient and their family by: Visiting the patient
Process indicator
Primary care indicator
Changed
22
Palliative care is available for the patient and their family by: Bringing the patient to the service
Process indicator
Primary care indicator
Changed
23
For a palliative patient in a crisis, the following can be arranged within 24 hours: Admission
Process indicator
Primary care indicator
Changed
24
For a palliative patient in a crisis, the following can be arranged within 24 hours: An urgent discharge to patients home
Process indicator
Primary care indicator
Changed
25
For a palliative patient in a crisis, the following can be arranged within 24 hours: Transfer to another setting of care
Process indicator
Primary care indicator
Changed
B. Out of hours (All settings)
Staff
26
A member of a palliative care team is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week: For palliative care consultation by phone
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
27
A member of a palliative care team is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week: To provide bedside care in a crisis
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
Drugs
28
The following treatments are available for a palliative patient 24 hours a day, 7 days a week: Opioids and other controlled drugs
Structure indicator
Primary care indicator
Combined/ Changed
29
The following treatments are available for a palliative patient 24 hours a day, 7 days a week: Anticipatory medication for the dying patient
Structure indicator
Primary care indicator
Combined/ Changed
30
The following treatments are available for a palliative patient 24 hours a day, 7 days a week: Syringe drivers
Structure indicator
Primary care indicator
Combined/ Changed
C. Continuity of care (All settings)
31
There is a procedure for exchange of clinical information across caregivers, disciplines and settings
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
32
Before discharge/transfer/admission there is information transfer to the caregivers in the next setting regarding care and treatment
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
33
There is a professional caregiver per individual palliative patient nominated as responsible ‘key worker‘ who coordinates care
Process indicator
All settings
Combined/ Changed
34
The responsible ‘key worker‘ pays special attention to continuity of care within and across settings
Process indicator
All settings
Combined/ Changed
Inpatient setting (Hospital, Palliative care unit, Hospice)
35
General practitioners (GP‘s) are routinely called when a patient is being discharged home or transferred to another setting
Process indicator
Inpatient setting indicator
Changed
36
The discharge/transfer letter of palliative care patients contains a multidimensional diagnosis, prognosis and treatment plan (see indicator 48 Clinical record )
Structure indicator
Inpatient setting indicator
Changed
Primary care
37
The primary care out-of-hours service has handover forms (written or -electronic) with clinical information of all palliative care patients in the terminal phase at home
Structure indicator
Primary care indicator
Changed
Infrastructure
A. All settings
Infrastructure
38
Specialist equipment (e.g. anti decubitus mattresses, aspiration material, stoma care, oxygen delivery, special drug administration pumps, hospital beds, etc.) is available for the nursing care of palliative care patients in each specific setting
Structure indicator
All settings
Changed
39
There is a dedicated room where multidisciplinary team meetings within one setting takes place
Structure indicator
All settings
New developed
40
There are dedicated facilities for multidisciplinary communications across settings: A dedicated room for meetings
Structure indicator
All settings
Changed
41
There are dedicated facilities for multidisciplinary communications across settings: Facilities for video or telephone conferences
Structure indicator
All settings
Changed
Information about care
42
There is an up to date directory of local caregivers and organisations that can have a role in palliative care
Structure indicator
All settings
New developed
43
There are dedicated information about the palliative care service: A website
Structure indicator
All settings
Changed
44
There are dedicated information about the palliative care service: Leaflets or brochures
Structure indicator
All settings
Changed
45
Patient information should be available in relevant foreign languages
Structure indicator
All settings
Changed
46
Appropriately trained translators should be available if professional caregivers and patient or family members do not speak the same language
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
47
There is a computerised medical record, to which all professional caregivers involved in the care of palliative care patients have access: Within one setting
Process indicator
All settings
Combined
IT systems
48
There is a computerised medical record, to which all professional caregivers involved in the care of palliative care patients have access: Across different settings
Process indicator
All settings
Combined
B. Inpatient setting (Hospital, Palliative care unit, Hospice, Nursing home)
49
Consultations with the patient and/or family/informal caregivers are done in an environment where privacy is guaranteed (e.g. there is a dedicated room)
Structure indicator
Inpatient setting indicator
Changed
50
Dying patients are able to have a single bedroom if they want to
Process indicator
Inpatient setting indicator
New developed
51
There are facilities for a relative to stay overnight
Structure indicator
Inpatient setting indicator
New developed
52
Family members and friends are able to visit the dying patient without restrictions of visiting hours
Process indicator
Inpatient setting indicator
Changed
53
There is a private place (e.g. dedicated room) for saying goodbye to the deceased
Structure indicator
Inpatient setting indicator
New developed
C. Home care
54
For a palliative care patient staying at home there is the possibility, if needed, to provide someone (a volunteer or professional) to stay overnight if needed
Process indicator
Home care indicator
Changed
Assessment tools
55
There is a holistic assessment of palliative care needs of patients and their family caregivers (e.g. SPARC)
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
56
There is an assessment of pain and other symptoms using a validated instrument
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
Personnel palliative care services
A. Staff
57
The multidisciplinary team that provides palliative care consists of at least one of the following disciplines: Physician
Structure indicator
All settings
Changed
58
The multidisciplinary team that provides palliative care consists of at least one of the following disciplines: Nurse
Structure indicator
All settings
Changed
59
The multidisciplinary team that provides palliative care consists of at least one of the following disciplines: Spiritual/religious caregiver
Structure indicator
All settings
Changed
60
The multidisciplinary team that provides palliative care consists of at least one of the following disciplines: Psychologist/Psychiatrist
Structure indicator
All settings
Changed
61
The multidisciplinary team that provides palliative care consists of at least one of the following disciplines: Social worker
Structure indicator
All settings
Changed
62
The multidisciplinary team that provides palliative care consists of at least one of the following disciplines: Physiotherapist
Structure indicator
All settings
Changed
63
The multidisciplinary team that provides palliative care consists of at least one of the following disciplines: Occupational therapist
Structure indicator
All settings
Changed
64
The multidisciplinary team that provides palliative care consists of at least one of the following disciplines: Dietitian
Structure indicator
All settings
Changed
65
The multidisciplinary team that provides palliative care consists of at least one of the following disciplines: Bereavement counselor
Structure indicator
All settings
Changed
66
The multidisciplinary team that provides palliative care consists of at least one of the following disciplines: Pharmacist
Structure indicator
All settings
Changed
B. Education and training for staff/volunteers
67
New staff receives a standardised induction training
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
68
All team members have certified (accredited?) training in palliative care, appropriate to their discipline
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
69
All volunteers have training in palliative care.
Process indicator
All settings
Combined/ Changed
C. Support systems
70
All team members have an annual appraisal
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
71
All team members who professionally deal with loss have access to a program for care for the carers
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
72
Satisfaction with working in the team is assessed (e.g. Team Climate Inventory)
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
D. Organisation of care
73
Palliative care services work in conjunction with the referring professional/team
Process indicator
Inpatient setting indicator
New developed
74
There is a regular interdisciplinary/multi-professional meeting to discuss palliative care patients: daily meetings to discuss day-to- day management of palliative care patients
Process indicator
All settings
Combined/ Changed
75
There is a regular interdisciplinary/multi-professional meeting to discuss palliative care patients:weekly (inter- and multidisciplinary) meeting to review palliative care patients referrals and care plans
Process indicator
All settings
Combined/ Changed
E. Information sharing
76
All relevant team members are informed about patients who have died
Process indicator
Inpatient setting indicator
Changed
Documentation of clinical data
A. Clinical record (All settings)
77
For patients receiving palliative care a structured palliative care clinical record is used
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
78
The palliative care clinical record contains evidence of documentation of the following items: Clinical summary
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
79
The palliative care clinical record contains evidence of documentation of the following items: Physical aspects of care
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
80
The palliative care clinical record contains evidence of documentation of the following items: Psychological and psychiatric aspects of care
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
81
The palliative care clinical record contains evidence of documentation of the following items: Social aspects of care
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
82
The palliative care clinical record contains evidence of documentation of the following items: Spiritual, religious, existential aspects of care
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
83
The palliative care clinical record contains evidence of documentation of the following items: Cultural aspects of care
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
84
The palliative care clinical record contains evidence of documentation of the following items: Care of imminently dying patient
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
85
The palliative care clinical record contains evidence of documentation of the following items: Ethical, legal aspects of care
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
86
The palliative care clinical record contains evidence of documentation of the following items: Multidimensional treatment plan
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
87
The palliative care clinical record contains evidence of documentation of the following items: Follow up assessment
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
B. Timely documentation
Inpatient setting (Hospital, Palliative care unit, Hospice, Nursing home)
88
Within 24 hours of admission there is documentation of the initial assessment of: Prognosis, Functional status, Pain and other symptoms, Psychosocial symptoms, The patient‘s capacity to make decisions
Process indicator
Inpatient setting indicator
Changed
89
There is documentation that patients reporting pain or other symptoms at the time of admission, had their pain or other symptoms relieved or reduced to a level of their satisfaction within 48 hours of admission
Process indicator
Inpatient setting indicator
Changed
90
There is documentation about the discussion of patient preferences within 48 hours of admission
Process indicator
Inpatient setting indicator
Changed
91
A discharge/transfer summary is available in the medical record within 48 hours after discharge/transfer
Process indicator
Inpatient setting indicator
Changed
All settings
92
There is documentation of pain assessment at 4 hour intervals
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
93
The discussion of patient‘s preferences is reviewed on a regular basis (in parallel with disease progression) or on request of the patient
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
94
There is documentation that within 24 hours after patient transfer, the responsible physician in the receiving setting has visited the patient
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
95
There is documentation that within 24 hours after patient transfer, the new palliative care team in the receiving setting has visited the patient
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
Quality and safety issues
A. Quality policies
96
The palliative care service has a quality improvement program
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
97
There is documentation whether targets set for quality improvement have been met
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
98
Clinical audit are part of the quality improvement program
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
99
The setting uses a program about early initiation of palliative care (e.g. the Gold Standards Framework)
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
B. Adverse events
100
There is a register for adverse events
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
101
There is a documented procedure to analyse and follow up adverse events
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
C. Complaints procedure
102
There is a patient complaints procedure
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
Reporting clinical activity of palliative care services
103
The palliative care service uses a database for recording clinical activity
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
104
The following is part of the database: Diagnosis, Date of diagnosis, Date of referral, Date of admission to the palliative care service, Date of death, Place of death, Preferred place of death
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
105
From the database the service is able to derive: Time from diagnosis to referral to palliative care, Time from referral to initiation of palliative care, Time from initiation of palliative care to death, Frequency of unplanned consultations with the out-of-hours service for palliative care patients who are at home, Frequency of unplanned hospital admissions of palliative care patients, Percentage of non-oncological patients receiving palliative care
Process indicator
All settings
New developed
106
Based on the database, an annual report is made about the service
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
Research
107
There is evidence that the palliative care service is involved in research in palliative care (e.g. authorship of publications, research grants)
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
Education
108
All health and social care students have standardised learning objectives for basic training in palliative care
Process indicator
All settings
Changed
109
All health and social care professionals have standardised learning objectives for continuing basic training in palliative care
Process indicator
All settings
New developed
110There is a program for specialised training in palliative care for professionals working in a service that provides specialised palliative careProcess indicatorAll settingsNew developed
Quality indicator set 3. Based on this meeting, adaptations were made and a new draft QI set was presented in the second steering group meeting in October.

Results

Search flow

The literature search resulted in 541 papers, including a previous systematic review on quality indicators for palliative care [8]. Most of the papers came from the database search (n=527), followed by the hand search (n= 29) and least of grey literature search (n=14). In the screening process 16 duplicates were identified, and titles and abstracts of 511 papers were searched. Of these, 389 documents were excluded, as they did not contain QIs. Full papers were obtained of 122 publications, from which 63 papers were included; 57 resulting from the database search [12-68] and another six papers from the additional hand searches (Figure  1) [69-74].
Figure 1

Flow chart literature search.

Flow chart literature search.

Results grey literature search

The grey literature search yielded seven papers, deriving from Belgium, the Netherlands and the UK [9,75-80]. These sources included government sites, national health organisations and national institutes (Figure  1). This additional search resulted in the development of 53 QIs, divided over almost all domains (see Additional file 1).

QI development

Sixhundred-thirtyfive QIs were derived from this literature review. After screening of duplicates, selecting process and structure QIs and combining QIs covering the same topic, the remaining 151 QIs were organised in the framework and discussed in the first steering group meeting. The two steering group meetings resulted in a reduction from 151 to 110 QIs (Additional file 1: Appendix C) (Figure  2). For instance the domain about finance QIs was excluded for the final set as the QIs were more useful on national level than in the setting specific palliative care institutions.
Figure 2

Flow chart quality indicator development.

Flow chart quality indicator development. The rest of the QIs were distributed over the framework (Table  1) [10]. The majority of the 110 QIs were process QIs (n=76), the other structure QIs (n=34). Some of the QIs (n=24) were only applicable in specific settings; ten in primary care, thirteen in inpatient settings and one in home care. The others were meant for all settings that deliver palliative care. Twenty-four QIs were developed based on organisational aspects found in literature (Table  1, QI 51). Finally, several QIs (n= 86), were changed in their presentation of text during the procedure. For example, originally developed QIs for other settings like the intensive care unit, were adapted to make them appropriate for palliative care settings.

Discussion

We were able to develop an international framework with 110 QIs to assess the organisation of palliative care in several kind of settings. To our knowledge, this study presents the first systematically developed international set of QIs on this topic. Part of the QIs are setting specific, whereas others will be applicable in all kind of settings that deliver palliative care. Where Pasman et al. performed a systematic review on all kind of QIs for palliative care, and Pastrana et al. focused on outcome indicators for Germany, we focused on process and structure QIs [8,81]. By using an international perspective and by not limiting the study to symptom control, our study follows the recommendations of Ostgathe et al. [82]. Our set also contains two QIs that are linked to the World Health Assembly’s proposed global health indicator ‘Access to palliative care assessed by morphine-equivalent consumption of strong opioid analgesia (excluding methadone) per death by cancer’, but without the restriction to patients with cancer [83].

Strength and limitations

We chose an approach with several consecutive methodological steps to develop a set of QIs. Of those aspects that were considered important for the organisation of palliative care but of which no QIs could be found, we developed QIs ourselves [84]. Of those QIs that were developed for a restricted group of patients or setting (e.g. ICU or vulnerable elderly) we checked whether we could rephrase them into QIs for more types of settings or palliative patients. Defining QIs in a consensus procedure is a good option if scientific literature is not yet available [7], particularly because it combines several methods to improve validity. Using a group approach has the advantage that participants can share their expertise and experience. Groups often make better decisions than individuals [85]. The naming of QIs as process or structure indicators can be discussed. Yet, this only influences the categorisation and not the content, importance or use of a QI. Another strong aspect of our procedure is the inclusion of grey literature, which created the possibility to include documents from important although not scientific sources [86]. As the Europall project was a collaboration of seven European countries, only experts of these countries were represented in the steering group meetings. Other European countries, with different health care and financing systems, cultures and palliative care, were not involved at this stage. This first step resulted in a set of structure and process QIs, that can help professionals or settings to measure the quality of care of their setting. In a next step, a subset will be developed of which each QI is applicable in the seven participating countries. Based on a modified RAND Delphi method the following set will be interesting for international comparison. The advantage of this comprehensive set enables each country and each setting the opportunity to see all QIs that are available on this topic. The last step will describe a pilot study to test the set of QIs on face-validity, applicability and discriminative power. This includes almost all (26) European countries. These studies will be published separately.

Further research

The final set can be used to provide feedback to settings or countries to reflect on their performance, for supporting quality improvement activities, accreditation, research, and enhancing transparency about quality. They can be used to evaluate the implementation of the WHO definition and the recommendations of the council of Europe [1,4]. From 2011 to 2015, a follow-up project to Europall called IMPACT (funded by the EU 7th framework) will develop and test strategies to implement these QIs.

Conclusions

This review resulted in the first comprehensive framework of QIs for the organisation of palliative care.

Competing interest

This work was partly funded by EAHC (Executive Agency for Health and Consumers, grant: 2006111 PPP ‘Best practices in palliative care’). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors have no financial disclosures.

Authors' contributions

KvB participated in the literature search, design of the study and drafted the manuscript. NA participated in the literature search, design of the study and drafted the manuscript. JH participated in the literature search, design of the study and drafted the manuscript. JMM was actively involved in the selection and developmental process of the QI. She attended the expert meeting. IC was actively involved in the selection and developmental process of the QI. She attended the expert meeting. LR and helped to draft the manuscript and had an advisory role. KV conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. YE conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/12/381/prepub

Additional file 1

Supplementary online content. Development of a set of process and structure indicators for palliative care: the Europall project. Appendix A- Search strategies for databases. Appendix B- Project partners. Appendix C- Indicators set for the organisation of palliative care. Click here for file
  71 in total

Review 1.  Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.

Authors:  S M Campbell; J Braspenning; A Hutchinson; M N Marshall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-12

2.  Quality indicators for palliative care: debates and dilemmas.

Authors:  Sheila Payne; Carlo Leget; Carlo Peruselli; Lukas Radbruch
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.762

3.  Developing a framework of, and quality indicators for, general practice management in Europe.

Authors:  Yvonne Engels; Stephen Campbell; Maaike Dautzenberg; Pieter van den Hombergh; Henrik Brinkmann; Joachim Szécsényi; Hector Falcoff; Luc Seuntjens; Beat Kuenzi; Richard Grol
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  Rural Palliative Care: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Carole A Robinson; Barbara Pesut; Joan L Bottorff; Andrea Mowry; Sandra Broughton; Gillian Fyles
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Use of a palliative care order set to improve resident comfort with symptom management in palliative care.

Authors:  B R Jarabek; A A Jama; S S Cha; S R Ruegg; T J Moynihan; F S McDonald
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 6.  Ensuring quality cancer care by the use of clinical practice guidelines and critical pathways.

Authors:  T J Smith; B E Hillner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Do palliative consultations improve patient outcomes?

Authors:  David Casarett; Amy Pickard; F Amos Bailey; Christine Ritchie; Christian Furman; Ken Rosenfeld; Scott Shreve; Zhen Chen; Judy A Shea
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Treatment efficacy of neural blockade in specialized palliative care services in Japan: a multicenter audit survey.

Authors:  Yo Tei; Tatsuya Morita; Toshimichi Nakaho; Chizuko Takigawa; Akiko Higuchi; Akihiko Suga; Tsukasa Tajima; Masayuki Ikenaga; Hitomi Higuchi; Naohito Shimoyama; Mayumi Fujimoto
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 9.  The detection of depression in palliative care.

Authors:  Lauren Rayner; Jon Håvard Loge; Elisabet Wasteson; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.302

10.  Outcome indicators in palliative care--how to assess quality and success. Focus group and nominal group technique in Germany.

Authors:  Tania Pastrana; Lukas Radbruch; Friedemann Nauck; Gerhard Höver; Martin Fegg; Martina Pestinger; Josef Ross; Norbert Krumm; Christoph Ostgathe
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 3.603

View more
  11 in total

1.  Face-validation of quality indicators for the organization of palliative care in hospitals in Indonesia: a contribution to quality improvement.

Authors:  Christantie Effendy; Kris Vissers; Kathrin Woitha; Jasper van Riet Paap; Sunaryadi Tejawinata; Myrra Vernooij-Dassen; Yvonne Engels
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Palliative care development in Latin America: an analysis using macro indicators.

Authors:  Tania Pastrana; Isabel Torres-Vigil; Liliana De Lima
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 3.  The Impact of Measuring Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Quality of and Access to Palliative Care.

Authors:  Deborah Dudgeon
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  MASCC/ESMO/EAPC survey of palliative programs.

Authors:  Mellar P Davis; Florian Strasser; Nathan Cherny; Norman Levan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Improving palliative care in selected settings in England using quality indicators: a realist evaluation.

Authors:  Steve Iliffe; Nathan Davies; Jill Manthorpe; Peter Crome; Sam H Ahmedzai; Myrra Vernooij-Dassen; Yvonne Engels
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.234

6.  Palliative Care for Children with Cancer in the Middle East: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Leila Khanali Mojen; Maryam Rassouli; Peyman Eshghi; Ali Akbari Sari; Majideh Heravi Karimooi
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

7.  A Comparison of Symptom Management for Children with Cancer in Iran and in the Selected Countries: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Maryam Pakseresht; Shahram Baraz; Maryam Rassouli; Nahid Rejeh; Shahnaz Rostami; Leila Khanali Mojen
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

8.  Pediatric Palliative Care in Iran: Applying Regionalization of Health Care Systems

Authors:  Leila Khanali Mojen; Maryam Rassouli; Peyman Eshghi; Kazem Zendedel; Ali Akbari Sari; Majideh Heravi Karimooi; Mamak Tahmasebi; Azam Shirin Abadi Farahani
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-05-26

9.  A systematic review and critical appraisal of quality indicators to assess optimal palliative care for older people with dementia.

Authors:  Sarah Amador; Elizabeth L Sampson; Claire Goodman; Louise Robinson
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 4.762

10.  Consensus on quality indicators to assess the organisation of palliative cancer and dementia care applicable across national healthcare systems and selected by international experts.

Authors:  Jasper van Riet Paap; Myrra Vernooij-Dassen; Rose-Marie Dröes; Lukas Radbruch; Kris Vissers; Yvonne Engels
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.