Literature DB >> 19012142

A study of information flow in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings.

George Demiris1, Karla Washington, Debra Parker Oliver, Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the information flow of hospice interdisciplinary meetings focusing on information access, exchange and documentation. The study participants were members of four hospice interdisciplinary teams in the Midwestern United States. Team members included a diverse range of professionals including physicians, nurses, social workers, bereavement counselors, and others. A total of 81 patient care discussions were videotaped and transcribed. A content analysis revealed several themes that needed to be addressed to improve the overall information flow, such as access to and recording of information, documentation of services, obtaining information from absent team members, data redundancy and updating of recorded information. On average, 5% of all utterances when discussing a patient case were focused on soliciting information from the member who had access to the patient chart. In 12.3% of all discussions, members referred to an absent member who could have provided additional information. In 8.6% of all discussions the same facts were repeated three times or more. Based on the findings we propose guidelines that can address potential informational gaps and enhance team communication in hospice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19012142      PMCID: PMC2680071          DOI: 10.1080/13561820802380027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  9 in total

Review 1.  Successful interprofessional collaboration on the hospice team.

Authors:  D J Reese; M A Sontag
Journal:  Health Soc Work       Date:  2001-08

Review 2.  A model for interdisciplinary collaboration.

Authors:  Laura R Bronstein
Journal:  Soc Work       Date:  2003-07

3.  Relationships between social work involvement and hospice outcomes: results of the National Hospice Social Work Survey.

Authors:  Dona J Reese; Mary Raymer
Journal:  Soc Work       Date:  2004-07

4.  Creating spaces that enhance nurse practitioner practice.

Authors:  L L Lindeke; M R Hauck; M Tanner
Journal:  J Pediatr Health Care       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.812

5.  A history of the Medicare hospice benefit.

Authors:  T Hoyer
Journal:  Hosp J       Date:  1998

6.  Interdisciplinary teams in health care: integration of family caregivers.

Authors:  C C Saltz; T Schaefer
Journal:  Soc Work Health Care       Date:  1996

7.  Patient initiatives in psychiatric care concerning shame in the discussion in co-operative team meetings.

Authors:  P Vuokila-Oikkonen; S Janhonen; M Nikkonen
Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.952

8.  Can health care teams improve primary care practice?

Authors:  Kevin Grumbach; Thomas Bodenheimer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Virtual multidisciplinary teams for cancer care.

Authors:  A T Axford; C Askill; A J Jones
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.184

  9 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the evidence base for telehospice.

Authors:  Debra Parker Oliver; George Demiris; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Karla Washington; Tami Day; Hannah Novak
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Caregiver participation in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings via videophone technology: A pilot study to improve pain management.

Authors:  Debra Parker Oliver; George Demiris; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Davina Porock; Jacqueline Collier; Antony Arthur
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Family caregiver participation in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings: how does it affect the nature and content of communication?

Authors:  Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Debra Parker Oliver; Robin L Kruse; George Demiris; L Ashley Gage; Ken Wagner
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2012-03-21

4.  WE'RE THE EYES AND THE EARS, BUT WE DON'T HAVE A VOICE: PERSPECTIVES OF HOSPICE AIDES.

Authors:  Djin Lai; Kristin G Cloyes; Margaret F Clayton; Katherine Doyon; Maija Reblin; Anna C Beck; Lee Ellington
Journal:  J Hosp Palliat Nurs       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.918

5.  Sharing atrocity stories in hospice: A study of niceness message strategies in interdisciplinary team meetings.

Authors:  Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Debra Parker Oliver; George Demiris; Cody P Cunningham
Journal:  Prog Palliat Care       Date:  2011-07-01

6.  An interdisciplinary team communication framework and its application to healthcare 'e-teams' systems design.

Authors:  Craig E Kuziemsky; Elizabeth M Borycki; Mary Ellen Purkis; Fraser Black; Michael Boyle; Denise Cloutier-Fisher; Lee Ann Fox; Patricia MacKenzie; Ann Syme; Coby Tschanz; Wendy Wainwright; Helen Wong
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 7.  Assessing caregivers for team interventions (ACT): a new paradigm for comprehensive hospice quality care.

Authors:  George Demiris; Debra Parker Oliver; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 2.500

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.