Literature DB >> 19111382

Medium-term anatomic and functional results of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy beyond the learning curve.

Filip Claerhout1, Dirk De Ridder, Jan Paul Roovers, Heidi Rommens, Federico Spelzini, Vanessa Vandenbroucke, Georges Coremans, Jan Deprest.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited prospective data on the anatomic and functional outcome after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) are available in the literature.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the medium-term anatomic and functional outcome of LSC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective consecutive series of 132 women with vaginal vault prolapse undergoing LSC between 2001 and 2006, which was after our learning curve. Patients with urodynamically proven stress incontinence (SI) underwent a concomitant tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent LSC with a polypropylene implant. MEASUREMENTS: Principal outcome measures were anatomic cure (stage 1 or lower) assessed by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) system and subjective cure and impact on quality of life measured by a standardised interview and, since its introduction in 2004, by a prolapse-specific quality-of-life questionnaire (P-QOL). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At a mean follow-up of 12.5 mo, the anatomic cure rate for the apex was 98%. Anatomic failures elsewhere were mainly at the posterior compartment (18%). Subjective prolapse cure rate was 91.7%, and no patients required reoperation for recurrent prolapse. Symptoms of preoperative SI, urge incontinence, or constipation were cured in 43%, 46%, and 42% of patients, respectively. The rate of de novo SI was 7.3%. De novo constipation developed in 5% and de novo dyspareunia developed in 19%. Patients' quality of life improved significantly. Erosions occurred in 4.5%, all within 1 yr. A limitation of the study is that the quality-of-life assessment score became available halfway through the study, limiting the number of preoperative observations (n=36).
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that LSC results in good anatomic outcome and subjective cure of prolapse symptoms at medium term. The posterior compartment was most vulnerable for recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19111382     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  29 in total

Review 1.  Traditional native tissue versus mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature.

Authors:  E J Stanford; A Cassidenti; M D Moen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Robot-assisted surgery:--impact on gynaecological and pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  O E O'Sullivan; B A O'Reilly
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Laparoscopic sacral colpoperineopexy: abdominal versus abdominal-vaginal posterior graft attachment.

Authors:  Colleen D McDermott; Jean Park; Colin L Terry; Patrick J Woodman; Douglass S Hale
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?

Authors:  Janine L Oliver; Ja-Hong Kim
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy--a single centre's experience.

Authors:  Filip Claerhout; Jan Paul Roovers; Paul Lewi; Jasper Verguts; Dirk De Ridder; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-05-29

6.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic mesh sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Jason P Gilleran; Matthew Johnson; Andrew Hundley
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-10

Review 7.  Robotic sacrocolpopexy: how does it compare with other prolapse repair techniques?

Authors:  Brian J Linder; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Four-defect repair in women with symptomatic anterior compartment prolapse: a large cohort study.

Authors:  S D Thys; D de Ridder; W Everaerts; S van Bruwaene; J Deprest; J P Roovers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  International Urogynecology Consultation Chapter 1 Committee 5: relationship of pelvic organ prolapse to associated pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms: lower urinary tract, bowel, sexual dysfunction and abdominopelvic pain.

Authors:  Marie-Andrée Harvey; Hui Ju Chih; Roxana Geoffrion; Baharak Amir; Alka Bhide; Pawel Miotla; Peter F W M Rosier; Ifeoma Offiah; Manidip Pal; Alexandriah Nicole Alas
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Trocar-guided total tension-free vaginal mesh repair of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Alfredo L Milani; Mariella I J Withagen; Mark E Vierhout
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-06-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.