Literature DB >> 23296693

Robotic sacrocolpopexy: how does it compare with other prolapse repair techniques?

Brian J Linder1, Daniel S Elliott.   

Abstract

Abdominal sacrocolpopexy has been shown to have the highest, most durable success rates among techniques for apical pelvic organ prolapse repair. Recently, there has been increased application of minimally invasive techniques, such as laparoscopic and robotic approaches, to performing a sacrocolpopexy. We report an overview of the literature in order to compare between robotic sacrocolpopexy and other surgical techniques for the repair of apical pelvic organ prolapse. Our review will include a discussion of operative techniques, anatomic and subjective success rates, costs, and complications.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23296693     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-012-0299-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  35 in total

1.  Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Geller; Brent A Parnell; Gena C Dunivan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Daniel S Elliott; Amy E Krambeck; George K Chow
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Benjamin Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Elisabeth J Adams; Suzanne Hagen; Cathryn Ma Glazener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

5.  Total colpocleisis for vaginal eversion.

Authors:  J O DeLancey; G W Morley
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Prevalence of abnormal urodynamic test results in continent women with severe genitourinary prolapse.

Authors:  B A Rosenzweig; S Pushkin; D Blumenfeld; N N Bhatia
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation.

Authors:  J T Benson; V Lucente; E McClellan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy.

Authors:  Danielle D Antosh; Stephanie A Grotzke; Marcela A McDonald; David Shveiky; Amy J Park; Robert E Gutman; Andrew I Sokol
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.091

9.  Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve.

Authors:  Mohamed N Akl; Jaime B Long; Dobie L Giles; Jeffrey L Cornella; Paul D Pettit; Anita H Chen; Paul M Magtibay
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for female genital organ prolapse: establishment of a learning curve.

Authors:  Cherif Y Akladios; Daphné Dautun; Christian Saussine; Jean Jaques Baldauf; Carole Mathelin; Arnaud Wattiez
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.435

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Associated Cystitis.

Authors:  Rizwan Hamid; Giovanni Losco
Journal:  Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep       Date:  2014
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.