Literature DB >> 19094165

Reaction time during semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) in patients with advanced visual field loss.

Katarzyna Nowomiejska1, Reinhard Vonthein, Jens Paetzold, Zbigniew Zagorski, Randy Kardon, Ulrich Schiefer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate reaction time (RT) in patients with advanced visual field (VF) loss using semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP).
METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with advanced VF loss caused by glaucoma (31) or retinitis pigmentosa (19), homonymous VF loss caused by post-chiasmal lesions (18) and unilateral anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (AION) (10) were examined with SKP (Octopus 101 perimeter). One eye in each patient was enrolled. Additionally, VFs in the 10 healthy fellow eyes of the patients with AION were compared with those in the 10 affected eyes. Reaction time was assessed during the SKP session by presenting kinetic stimuli (III4e) with constant angular velocities of 3 degrees /second moving linearly along so-called 'RT vectors' at four different locations inside the III4e isoptre. Each stimulus presentation was repeated four times in randomized order.
RESULTS: The geometric mean RT was 794 ms (95% reference interval [RI] 391-1615 ms) in patients with glaucoma, 702 ms (95% RI 306-1608 ms) in patients with retinitis pigmentosa and 675 ms (95% RI 312-1460 ms) in patients with hemianopia. Increases in RT for every 1 degree of eccentricity were 1%, 0.9% and 0.4%, respectively. The geometric mean RT in the 10 patients with unilateral optic neuropathy was 644 ms in affected eyes and 435 ms in unaffected eyes, reflecting an increase of 51% (95% confidence interval 42-62%).
CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial inter-subject variability in RT in patients with advanced VF loss. It is possible to correct the position of the isoptres by assessing individual RT. There were no relevant differences in RT between the disease groups. Reaction time increases with eccentricity. In monocular disease (AION), RT is prolonged, compared with in healthy fellow eyes. However, in clinical routine the RT-related displacement of isoptres is negligible in the vast majority of cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19094165     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01407.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of kinetic programs in various automated perimeters.

Authors:  Shigeki Hashimoto; Chota Matsumoto; Mariko Eura; Sachiko Okuyama; Yoshikazu Shimomura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Peripheral Visual Fields in Children and Young Adults Using Semi-automated Kinetic Perimetry: Feasibility of Testing, Normative Data, and Repeatability.

Authors:  Anne Bjerre; Charlotte Codina; Helen Griffiths
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2014-06-09

3.  Detection of Visual Field Loss in Pituitary Disease: Peripheral Kinetic Versus Central Static.

Authors:  Fiona J Rowe; Christopher P Cheyne; Marta García-Fiñana; Carmel P Noonan; Claire Howard; Jayne Smith; Joanne Adeoye
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2015-05-13

4.  Effects of mydriasis and miosis on kinetic perimetry findings in normal participants.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Nobuyuki Shoji; Chieko Kobashi; Ayaka Yamanashi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Differential vertical visual latency as determined with a simultaneity paradigm.

Authors:  Shephali Patel; Steven H Schwartz; William H Swanson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Reliability of Semiautomated Kinetic Perimetry (SKP) and Goldmann Kinetic Perimetry in Children and Adults With Retinal Dystrophies.

Authors:  Claire S Barnes; Ronald A Schuchard; David G Birch; Gislin Dagnelie; Leah Wood; Robert K Koenekoop; Ava K Bittner
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Volume of visual field assessed with kinetic perimetry and its application to static perimetry.

Authors:  John B Christoforidis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-26

8.  Effects of different levels of intraocular stray light on kinetic perimetry findings.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Nobuyuki Shoji; Karen Isono; Manami Tsuchiya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The second face of blindness: processing speed deficits in the intact visual field after pre- and post-chiasmatic lesions.

Authors:  Michał Bola; Carolin Gall; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of octopus semi-automated kinetic perimetry and humphrey peripheral static perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic cases.

Authors:  Fiona J Rowe; Carmel Noonan; Melanie Manuel
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.