Literature DB >> 27928298

Peripheral Visual Fields in Children and Young Adults Using Semi-automated Kinetic Perimetry: Feasibility of Testing, Normative Data, and Repeatability.

Anne Bjerre1, Charlotte Codina1, Helen Griffiths1.   

Abstract

Normative visual field area, feasibility and repeatability using (Octopus) semi-automated kinetic perimetry are reported in 221 healthy volunteers aged 5-22 years. I4e and I2e stimuli assessed the visual field at 5°/second (°/s) or 3°/s. Blind spot was assessed with I2e at 2°/s. Reliable visual fields were plotted in 23% of participants <10 years, 64% of 10-12-year-olds, and 98% aged 13-22 years. Visual field areas were unchanged with age using 5°/s, but increased using 3°/s for I2e (p = 0.028). Blind spot area was unchanged with age. Reaction times reduced with age (p < 0.004). There was no learning effect. A test speed of 5°/s is recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feasibility; normative peripheral vision; repeatability; semi-automated kinetic perimetry; visual development

Year:  2014        PMID: 27928298      PMCID: PMC5123173          DOI: 10.3109/01658107.2014.902971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroophthalmology        ISSN: 0165-8107


  28 in total

1.  A longitudinal study of visual expectation and reaction time in the first year of life.

Authors:  Susan A Rose; Judith F Feldman; Jeffery J Jankowski; Donna M Caro
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

2.  Feasibility and outcome of automated static perimetry in children using continuous light increment perimetry (CLIP) and fast threshold strategy.

Authors:  B K Wabbels; S Wilscher
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2005-12

3.  Scotoma mapping by semi-automated kinetic perimetry: the effects of stimulus properties and the speed of subjects' responses.

Authors:  Jan Dolderer; Reinhard Vonthein; Chris A Johnson; Ulrich Schiefer; William Hart
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2006-06

4.  The learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using frequency doubling technology.

Authors:  Amjad Horani; Shahar Frenkel; Claudia Yahalom; Marilyn D Farber; Uriel Ticho; Eytan Z Blumenthal
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Comparison between semiautomated kinetic perimetry and conventional Goldmann manual kinetic perimetry in advanced visual field loss.

Authors:  Katarzyna Nowomiejska; Reinhard Vonthein; Jens Paetzold; Zbigniew Zagorski; Randy Kardon; Ulrich Schiefer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Serial examination of the normal visual field using Octopus automated projection perimetry. Evidence for a learning effect.

Authors:  J M Wood; J M Wild; M K Hussey; S J Crews
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1987-06

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Normative psychomotor vigilance task performance in children ages 6 to 11--the Tucson Children's Assessment of Sleep Apnea (TuCASA).

Authors:  Claire C Venker; James L Goodwin; Denise J Roe; Kristine L Kaemingk; Shelagh Mulvaney; Stuart F Quan
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.816

9.  Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey.

Authors:  Geoff Der; Ian J Deary
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-03

10.  Constriction of the visual field of children after early visual deprivation.

Authors:  E R Bowering; D Maurer; T L Lewis; H P Brent
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of Quality and Output of Different Optimal Perimetric Testing Approaches in Children With Glaucoma.

Authors:  Dipesh E Patel; Phillippa M Cumberland; Bronwen C Walters; Isabelle Russell-Eggitt; John Brookes; Maria Papadopoulos; Peng Tee Khaw; Ananth C Viswanathan; David Garway-Heath; Mario Cortina-Borja; Jugnoo S Rahi
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Reliability of Semiautomated Kinetic Perimetry (SKP) and Goldmann Kinetic Perimetry in Children and Adults With Retinal Dystrophies.

Authors:  Claire S Barnes; Ronald A Schuchard; David G Birch; Gislin Dagnelie; Leah Wood; Robert K Koenekoop; Ava K Bittner
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Peripheral Visual Reaction Time Is Faster in Deaf Adults and British Sign Language Interpreters than in Hearing Adults.

Authors:  Charlotte J Codina; Olivier Pascalis; Heidi A Baseler; Alexandra T Levine; David Buckley
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-06

4.  Normal Threshold Size of Stimuli in Children Using a Game-Based Visual Field Test.

Authors:  Yanfang Wang; Zaria Ali; Siddharth Subramani; Susmito Biswas; Cecilia Fenerty; David B Henson; Tariq Aslam
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2016-11-24

5.  Comparative evaluation of Octopus semi-automated kinetic perimeter with Humphrey and Goldmann perimeters in neuro-ophthalmic disorders.

Authors:  Karthika Bhaskaran; Swati Phuljhele; Pawan Kumar; Rohit Saxena; Dewang Angmo; Pradeep Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Study of Optimal Perimetric Testing in Children (OPTIC): Feasibility, Reliability and Repeatability of Perimetry in Children.

Authors:  Dipesh E Patel; Phillippa M Cumberland; Bronwen C Walters; Isabelle Russell-Eggitt; Jugnoo S Rahi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Is Peripheral Motion Detection Affected by Myopia?

Authors:  Junhan Wei; Deying Kong; Xi Yu; Lili Wei; Yue Xiong; Adeline Yang; Björn Drobe; Jinhua Bao; Jiawei Zhou; Yi Gao; Zhifen He
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.677

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.