Literature DB >> 19093294

Evaluation criteria for musculoskeletal and craniofacial tissue engineering constructs: a conference report.

.   

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, tissue engineering (TE) has evolved into a thriving research and commercial development field. However, applying TE strategies to musculoskeletal (MSK) and craniofacial tissues has been particularly challenging since these tissues must also transmit loads during activities of daily living. To address this need, organizers invited a small group of bioengineers, surgeons, biologists, and material scientists from academia, industry, and government to participate in a two and half-day conference to develop general and tissue-specific criteria for evaluating new concepts and tissue-engineered constructs, including threshold values of success. Participants were assigned to four breakout groups representing commonly injured tissues, including tendon and ligament, articular cartilage, meniscus and temporomandibular joint, and bone and intervertebral disc. Working in multidisciplinary teams, participants first carefully defined one or two important unmet clinical needs for each tissue type, including current standards of care and the potential impact of TE solutions. The groups then sought to identify important parameters for evaluating repair outcomes in preclinical studies and to specify minimally acceptable values for these parameters. The importance of in vitro TE studies was then discussed in the context of these preclinical studies. Where data were not currently available from clinical, preclinical, or culture studies, the groups sought to identify important areas of preclinical research needed to speed the development process. This report summarizes the findings of the conference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19093294      PMCID: PMC2809981          DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  65 in total

1.  Regional structural and viscoelastic properties of fibrocartilage upon dynamic nanoindentation of the articular condyle.

Authors:  K Hu; P Radhakrishnan; R V Patel; J J Mao
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.867

2.  Biomechanical considerations of animal models used in tissue engineering of bone.

Authors:  Michael A K Liebschner
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Leesa M Galatz; Craig M Ball; Sharlene A Teefey; William D Middleton; Ken Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Tissue-engineered osteochondral constructs in the shape of an articular condyle.

Authors:  Adel Alhadlaq; Jeremy J Mao
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  Cato Laurencin; Yusuf Khan; Saadiq F El-Amin
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 6.  Living with cracks: damage and repair in human bone.

Authors:  David Taylor; Jan G Hazenberg; T Clive Lee
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 43.841

7.  Assessment of the canine model of rotator cuff injury and repair.

Authors:  Kathleen A Derwin; Andrew R Baker; Michael J Codsi; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Mechanical properties of primate vascularized vs. nonvascularized patellar tendon grafts; changes over time.

Authors:  D L Butler; E S Grood; F R Noyes; M L Olmstead; R B Hohn; S P Arnoczky; M G Siegel
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 9.  Animal models of intervertebral disc degeneration: lessons learned.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Lotz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Tissue-engineering approach to regenerating the intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Damien M O'Halloran; Abhay S Pandit
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2007-08
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Functional tissue engineering of tendon: Establishing biological success criteria for improving tendon repair.

Authors:  Andrew P Breidenbach; Steven D Gilday; Andrea L Lalley; Nathaniel A Dyment; Cynthia Gooch; Jason T Shearn; David L Butler
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  The rationale for identifying clinical predictors modifiable by tissue engineering for translational models.

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; Warren R Dunn
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 3.  High-content drug screening with engineered musculoskeletal tissues.

Authors:  Herman Vandenburgh
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 4.  Cell-free and cell-based approaches for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Ericka M Bueno; Julie Glowacki
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 20.543

5.  Anatomically shaped tooth and periodontal regeneration by cell homing.

Authors:  K Kim; C H Lee; B K Kim; J J Mao
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 6.  A brief history of tendon and ligament bioreactors: Impact and future prospects.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Dyment; Jennifer G Barrett; Hani A Awad; Catherine A Bautista; Albert J Banes; David L Butler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 7.  Biomimetic 3D Tissue Models for Advanced High-Throughput Drug Screening.

Authors:  Ki-Hwan Nam; Alec S T Smith; Saifullah Lone; Sunghoon Kwon; Deok-Ho Kim
Journal:  J Lab Autom       Date:  2014-11-10

Review 8.  Factors influencing the long-term behavior of extracellular matrix-derived scaffolds for musculoskeletal soft tissue repair.

Authors:  Christopher R Rowland; Dianne Little; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2012

Review 9.  Mechanical design criteria for intervertebral disc tissue engineering.

Authors:  Nandan L Nerurkar; Dawn M Elliott; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  Evolving strategies in mechanobiology to more effectively treat damaged musculoskeletal tissues.

Authors:  David L Butler; Nathaniel A Dyment; Jason T Shearn; Kirsten R C Kinneberg; Andrew P Breidenbach; Andrea L Lalley; Steven D Gilday; Cynthia Gooch; M B Rao; Chia-feng Liu; Christopher Wylie
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.