Literature DB >> 19093122

Intraindividual comparison of myocardial delayed enhancement MR imaging using gadobenate dimeglumine at 1.5 T and 3 T.

Bernhard D Klumpp1, Joern Sandstede, Klaus P Lodemann, Achim Seeger, Tobias Hoevelborn, Michael Fenchel, Ulrich Kramer, Claus D Claussen, Stephan Miller.   

Abstract

For contrast-enhanced imaging techniques relying on strong T1 weighting, 3 T provides increased contrast compared with 1.5 T. The aim of our study was the intraindividual comparison of delayed enhancement MR imaging at 1.5 T and at 3 T. Twenty patients with myocardial infarction were examined at 1.5 T and 3 T. Fifteen minutes after injection of contrast agent (0.1 mmol gadobenate dimeglumine per kg body weight), inversion recovery gradient recalled echo (IR-GRE) sequences were acquired (1.5 T/3 T: TR 11.0/9.9 ms, TE 4.4/4.9 ms, flip 30 degrees /30 degrees , slice thickness 6/6 mm) to assess myocardial viability. Two observers rated image quality (Wilcoxon signed rank test). Quantification of hyperenhanced myocardium and standardized SNR/CNR measurements were performed (Student's t test). There was no significant difference with respect to image quality (1.5 T/3 T: 3.5/3.3, p = 0.34, reader 1; 2.4/2.7, p = 0.12, reader 2) and infarction size (760 +/- 566/828 +/- 677 mm(2) at 1.5 T, 808 +/- 639/826 +/- 726 mm(2) at 3 T, reader 1/reader 2, p > 0.05). Mean SNR in hyperenhanced/normal myocardium was 19.2/6.2 at 1.5 T and 29.5/8.8 at 3 T (p < 0.05). Mean CNR was 14.3 at 1.5 T and 26.0 at 3 T (p < 0.05). Delayed enhancement MR imaging at 3 T is a robust procedure yielding superior tissue contrast at 3 T compared with 1.5 T which is, however, not reflected by increased image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19093122     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1248-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  29 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  [Optimal use of contrast medium in contrast enhanced MR imaging of the heart].

Authors:  Hajime Sakuma
Journal:  Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2002-10

3.  Double inversion black-blood fast spin-echo imaging of the human heart: a comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T.

Authors:  Robert L Greenman; John E Shirosky; Robert V Mulkern; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T.

Authors:  Matthias Gutberlet; Kerstin Schwinge; Patrick Freyhardt; Birgit Spors; Matthias Grothoff; Timm Denecke; Lutz Lüdemann; Ralph Noeske; Thoralf Niendorf; Roland Felix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: feasibility and implications for clinical applications.

Authors:  Matthias Gutberlet; Ralph Noeske; Kerstin Schwinge; Patrick Freyhardt; Roland Felix; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function.

Authors:  R J Kim; D S Fieno; T B Parrish; K Harris; E L Chen; O Simonetti; J Bundy; J P Finn; F J Klocke; R M Judd
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) single-shot TrueFISP for assessment of myocardial infarction at 3 tesla.

Authors:  Armin Huber; Kerstin Bauner; Bernd J Wintersperger; Scott B Reeder; Frank Stadie; Edgar Mueller; Michaela Schmidt; Eva Winnik; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Regional heterogeneity of human myocardial infarcts demonstrated by contrast-enhanced MRI. Potential mechanisms.

Authors:  J A Lima; R M Judd; A Bazille; S P Schulman; E Atalar; E A Zerhouni
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Relaxivity of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine (Magnevist), Gadobutrol (Gadovist), and Gadobenate Dimeglumine (MultiHance) in human blood plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Jörg Pintaske; Petros Martirosian; Hansjörg Graf; Gunter Erb; Klaus-Peter Lodemann; Claus D Claussen; Fritz Schick
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  The "no-reflow" phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog.

Authors:  R A Kloner; C E Ganote; R B Jennings
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  8 in total

1.  High resolution myocardial magnetic resonance stress perfusion imaging at 3 T using a 1 M contrast agent.

Authors:  Bernhard D Klumpp; Achim Seeger; Christina Doesch; Joerg Doering; Tobias Hoevelborn; Ulrich Kramer; Michael Fenchel; Meinrad P Gawaz; Claus D Claussen; Stephan Miller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Combined blood pool and extracellular contrast agents for pediatric and young adult cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Joyce T Johnson; Joshua D Robinson; Jie Deng; Cynthia K Rigsby
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30

3.  Utility of respiratory-navigator-rejected k-space lines for improved signal-to-noise ratio in three-dimensional cardiac MR.

Authors:  Mehmet Akçakaya; Jaime L Shaw; Thomas H Hauser; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  [3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging in children and adults with congenital heart disease].

Authors:  I Voges; M Jerosch-Herold; M Helle; C Hart; H-H Kramer; C Rickers
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Dobutamine stress tagging and gradient-echo imaging for detection of coronary heart disease at 3 T.

Authors:  D Thomas; C Meyer; K Strach; C P Naehle; J Mazraeh; T Gampert; H H Schild; T Sommer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Comparison of acquisition time and dose for late gadolinium enhancement imaging at 3.0 T in patients with chronic myocardial infarction using Gd-BOPTA.

Authors:  A Doltra; A Skorin; A Hamdan; B Schnackenburg; R Gebker; C Klein; E Nagel; E Fleck; S Kelle
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  MRI and CT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: indications and applications.

Authors:  Konstantin Nikolaou; Hatem Alkadhi; Fabian Bamberg; Sebastian Leschka; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-11-23

8.  Differences in Aortic Valve and Left Ventricular Parameters Related to the Severity of Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Authors:  Inyoung Song; Sung Min Ko; Jeong Geun Yi; Hyun Keun Chee; Jun Seok Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.