| Literature DB >> 19091060 |
Bernardo J Foth1, Neng Zhang, Sachel Mok, Peter R Preiser, Zbynek Bozdech.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malaria is a one of the most important infectious diseases and is caused by parasitic protozoa of the genus Plasmodium. Previously, quantitative characterization of the P. falciparum transcriptome demonstrated that the strictly controlled progression of these parasites through their intra-erythrocytic developmental cycle is accompanied by a continuous cascade of gene expression. Although such analyses have proven immensely useful, the correlations between abundance of transcripts and their cognate proteins remain poorly characterized.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19091060 PMCID: PMC2646281 DOI: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-12-r177
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol ISSN: 1474-7596 Impact factor: 13.583
Gel-loading regimen
| Gel | TP1 | TP2 | TP3 | TP4 | Pool |
| gel1 | Cy3 | Cy5 | Cy2 | ||
| gel2 | Cy5 | Cy3 | Cy2 | ||
| gel3 | Cy3 | Cy5 | Cy2 | ||
| gel4 | Cy5 | Cy3 | Cy2 | ||
| gel5 | Cy3 | Cy5 | Cy2 | ||
| gel6 | Cy3 | Cy5 | Cy2 | ||
| gel7 | Cy5 | Cy3 | Cy2 | ||
| gel8 | Cy3 | Cy5 | Cy2 |
Each two-dimensional gel was loaded with 50 μg of a Cy3-labeled time point (TP) sample, 50 μg of a different Cy5-labeled TP sample, and 50 μg of the Cy2-labeled internal standard (protein reference pool).
Figure 1Representative two-dimensional DIGE gels of . (a) Protein reference pool (internal standard) labeled with Cy2. (b) Overlay of images showing Cy3-labeled and Cy5-labeled parasite proteins from time point (TP) samples 1 (TP1, green) and 3 (TP3, red). Proteins were separated in the first dimension along a nonlinear pH gradient (pH3-7NL, 24 cm Immobiline DryStrip [GE Healthcare]), and in the second dimension on an 11% polyacrylamide gel. Proteins/protein isoforms identified by tandem mass spectrometry are highlighted in color. In instances where more than one spot was identified as the same protein, the spots were numbered in numerical order from left to right (not shown), except for enolase, for which spot numbers are denoted in the figure. The molecular weight marker is indicated in kDa. DIGE, differential gel electrophoresis.
Figure 2Determining relative protein abundance using 2D-DIGE. The relative protein abundance of a spot is defined as the normalized spot volume observed in the Cy3 or Cy5 channel (protein from a time point sample) divided by the normalized spot volume of the same spot measured in the Cy2 channel (protein reference pool) on the same gel. (a) gel images and three-dimensional 'landscape representation' of five protein spots identified as eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)4A (or RNA helicase-1/helicase 45; PF14_0655) of P. falciparum. The top panel ('Pool') shows a representative image (gel3; see Table 1) of the Cy2-labeled protein reference pool/internal standard, whereas the lower panels depict one typical image for each of the four time point (TP) samples (TP1: Cy3/gel3; TP2: Cy5/gel7; TP3: Cy3/gel4; TP4: Cy5/gel6). (b) Overlay image of the Cy3-labeled and Cy5-labeled eIF4A isoforms from TP1 (green) and TP2 (red) from gel1. (c) Summary of the quantitative DIGE data and the resulting relative protein abundance profiles for the five eIF4A isoforms derived from all eight gels. The table presents the corresponding relative standard deviations for each set of four abundance measurements (for a given spot and time point sample) as well as the median value of the four relative standard deviations for each spot. (d) Three-dimensional presentation of eIF5A (PFL0210c) isoform 1, which happened to be the spot exhibiting the greatest fold change in the entire analysis (15.1-fold increase in relative protein abundance between TP1 and TP4). 2D-DIGE, two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis.
Figure 3Statistics of changes in relative protein abundance. (a) Cumulative histogram of maximum fold change in relative abundance for proteins/isoforms that exhibit significant change (analysis of variance [ANOVA] P < 0.01) throughout the four schizont-stage time point (TP) samples. (b) the pie chart on the left illustrates how the 623 differential gel electrophoresis (DIGE) protein expression profiles are distributed among four categories defined by the statistical measures of variation (ANOVA), experimental reproducibility (median relative standard deviation [RelStDev]), and the maximum fold change (MFC) of relative protein abundance. The partial pie chart on the right provides an additional classification relating to the direction of abundance change, with the icons giving a generic illustration of each category.
Protein data for the 54 protein isoforms identified in this study
| Protein name | PlasmoDB ID and NCBI GenBank accession number | Calculated | Spot number | Mascot MS/MS ion search | Average volume ratio | Relative standard deviation | Maximum fold change | One-way ANOVA | ||||||||||
| Mass (kDa) | pI | Score | Peptides matched | Sequence coverage | TP1 | TP2 | TP3 | TP4 | TP1 | TP2 | TP3 | TP4 | Median | |||||
| 2-Cys peroxiredoxin | [PDB: | 22.0 | 6.7 | - | 559 | 4 | 48% | 1.03 | 1.02 | 0.96 | 0.78 | 5.3% | 15.4% | 9.9% | 6.4% | 8.1% | 1.33× | 0.016 |
| Actin-I | [PDB: | 42.1 | 5.2 | 1 | 533 | 9 | 40% | 0.58 | 0.97 | 1.30 | 1.24 | 5.9% | 5.9% | 8.5% | 3.2% | 5.9% | 2.24× | <0.001 |
| 2 | 609 | 8 | 37% | 0.60 | 0.93 | 1.44 | 1.25 | 4.8% | 5.6% | 5.6% | 3.4% | 5.2% | 2.39× | <0.001 | ||||
| 3 | 391 | 8 | 36% | 0.66 | 1.01 | 1.60 | 1.35 | 7.0% | 4.4% | 7.0% | 2.2% | 5.7% | 2.43× | <0.001 | ||||
| 4 | 415 | 5 | 21% | 0.63 | 0.94 | 1.21 | 0.97 | 7.7% | 3.4% | 8.6% | 6.8% | 7.3% | 1.91× | <0.001 | ||||
| 5 | 192 | 6 | 29% | 1.57 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 1.40 | 8.7% | 7.0% | 12.6% | 11.3% | 10.0% | 2.15× | <0.001 | ||||
| Adenosine deaminase | [PDB: | 42.9 | 5.4 | - | 484 | 7 | 23% | 1.24 | 1.18 | 1.15 | 0.80 | 14.5% | 5.0% | 2.6% | 6.6% | 5.8% | 1.55× | <0.001 |
| eIF4A/RNA helicase-1/helicase 45 | [PDB: | 45.3 | 5.5 | 1 | 318 | 8 | 24% | 0.41 | 1.32 | 1.19 | 1.01 | 4.4% | 3.7% | 7.8% | 5.8% | 5.1% | 3.26× | <0.001 |
| 2 | 159 | 2 | 10% | 0.61 | 1.24 | 1.23 | 1.05 | 5.6% | 5.0% | 6.6% | 2.7% | 5.3% | 2.03× | <0.001 | ||||
| 3 | 143 | 6 | 22% | 0.73 | 1.20 | 1.30 | 1.16 | 8.8% | 6.1% | 20.6% | 9.5% | 9.2% | 1.79× | <0.001 | ||||
| 4 | 133 | 4 | 19% | 1.58 | 0.57 | 0.88 | 1.11 | 5.7% | 5.2% | 8.2% | 3.6% | 5.4% | 2.78× | <0.001 | ||||
| 5 | 242 | 4 | 13% | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.94 | 1.22 | 9.6% | 6.5% | 11.8% | 10.4% | 10.0% | 2.65× | <0.001 | ||||
| eIF4A-like helicase | [PDB: | 52.6 | 5.7 | 1 | 233 | 4 | 15% | 0.99 | 1.05 | 1.24 | 1.22 | 7.9% | 8.8% | 15.7% | 7.4% | 8.3% | 1.25× | 0.024 |
| 2 | 368 | 7 | 26% | 1.02 | 1.06 | 1.18 | 1.13 | 7.8% | 4.2% | 7.6% | 7.3% | 7.4% | 1.16× | 0.045 | ||||
| eIF5A | [PDB: | 17.8 | 5.4 | 1 | 117 | 2 | 27% | 0.12 | 0.32 | 1.26 | 1.79 | 18.2% | 18.1% | 10.9% | 23.4% | 18.2% | 15.09× | <0.001 |
| 2 | 129 | 2 | 16% | 1.05 | 0.98 | 0.79 | 0.55 | 4.9% | 12.3% | 30.1% | 28.8% | 20.5% | 1.9× | 0.005 | ||||
| 3 | 151 | 2 | 16% | 1.27 | 1.44 | 1.09 | 0.65 | 19.4% | 24.0% | 16.9% | 21.6% | 20.5% | 2.23× | <0.001 | ||||
| Enolase | [PDB: | 48.6 | 6.2 | 1 | 344 | 10 | 30% | 1.10 | 1.11 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 4.2% | 4.4% | 4.6% | 7.2% | 4.5% | 1.26× | <0.001 |
| 2 | 513 | 10 | 33% | 1.15 | 1.18 | 0.99 | 0.83 | 14.1% | 9.5% | 4.8% | 10.0% | 9.8% | 1.42× | <0.001 | ||||
| 3 | 627 | 10 | 33% | 1.18 | 1.17 | 1.09 | 0.87 | 5.4% | 5.0% | 7.9% | 8.5% | 6.7% | 1.35× | <0.001 | ||||
| 4 | 897 | 10 | 39% | 1.13 | 1.06 | 1.11 | 0.92 | 11.7% | 2.2% | 8.3% | 5.2% | 6.7% | 1.22× | 0.016 | ||||
| 5 | 138 | 4 | 15% | 1.03 | 0.91 | 1.14 | 0.93 | 19.9% | 7.8% | 9.9% | 11.9% | 10.9% | 1.25× | 0.125 | ||||
| 3a | 213 | 5 | 14% | 1.83 | 1.09 | 0.68 | 0.52 | 12.7% | 12.9% | 24.3% | 3.3% | 12.8% | 3.52× | <0.001 | ||||
| 4a | 122 | 3 | 11% | 1.43 | 1.06 | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.9% | 3.1% | 16.0% | 4.8% | 4.0% | 1.94× | <0.001 | ||||
| EXP-2 | [PDB: | 33.6 | 5.1 | - | 133 | 3 | 12% | 0.27 | 0.70 | 0.88 | 0.97 | 8.1% | 4.3% | 10.4% | 9.3% | 8.7% | 3.62× | <0.001 |
| HSP40 | [PDB: | 47.8 | 8.1 | - | 118 | 4 | 19% | 0.70 | 0.85 | 0.94 | 2.06 | 13.2% | 37.4% | 14.2% | 18.9% | 16.5% | 2.94× | <0.001 |
| HSP60 | [PDB: | 62.9 | 6.7 | 1 | 171 | 5 | 11% | 1.29 | 0.96 | 1.10 | 1.37 | 8.6% | 4.1% | 7.0% | 3.8% | 5.5% | 1.43× | <0.001 |
| 2 | 235 | 5 | 11% | 1.31 | 0.89 | 1.08 | 1.35 | 5.9% | 3.8% | 5.5% | 6.5% | 5.7% | 1.51× | <0.001 | ||||
| HSP70-1a | [PDB: | 74.4 | 5.5 | 1 | 607 | 10 | 20% | 1.31 | 1.13 | 1.01 | 0.93 | 14.7% | 10.1% | 12.9% | 7.9% | 11.5% | 1.41× | 0.008 |
| 2 | 644 | 10 | 22% | 1.46 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.96 | 5.7% | 4.5% | 10.8% | 7.1% | 6.4% | 1.52× | <0.001 | ||||
| HSP70-2a | [PDB: | 72.5 | 5.2 | 1 | 486 | 8 | 17% | 0.95 | 1.15 | 0.98 | 1.08 | 8.7% | 5.0% | 7.8% | 8.1% | 8.0% | 1.2× | 0.014 |
| 2 | 724 | 10 | 23% | 1.06 | 1.07 | 1.02 | 1.11 | 8.6% | 4.8% | 7.2% | 4.4% | 6.0% | 1.08× | 0.369 | ||||
| 3 | 694 | 10 | 21% | 1.26 | 0.87 | 1.03 | 1.09 | 4.9% | 2.5% | 6.1% | 4.1% | 4.5% | 1.46× | <0.001 | ||||
| HSP70-3a | [PDB: | 73.7 | 6.5 | 1 | 193 | 5 | 7% | 1.08 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.06 | 7.2% | 7.8% | 16.2% | 4.9% | 7.5% | 1.11× | 0.299 |
| 2 | 488 | 8 | 12% | 1.01 | 0.98 | 1.16 | 1.11 | 8.0% | 2.2% | 11.3% | 6.2% | 7.1% | 1.19× | 0.028 | ||||
| CA1 | - [Genbank: | 28.9 | 6.6 | 1 | 264 | 5 | 32% | 1.48 | 0.98 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 6.2% | 4.3% | 13.7% | 3.8% | 5.2% | 2.5× | <0.001 |
| 2 | 412 | 7 | 40% | 1.16 | 0.94 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 6.0% | 7.1% | 17.4% | 6.0% | 6.6% | 1.61× | <0.001 | ||||
| Human SOD1 | - [Genbank: | 16.2 | 5.7 | - | 247 | 5 | 57% | 1.04 | 1.18 | 1.13 | 0.74 | 9.2% | 12.5% | 7.3% | 16.2% | 10.8% | 1.6× | 0.001 |
| HETK | [PDB: | 20.6 | 7.0 | - | 575 | 8 | 56% | 1.02 | 1.13 | 0.96 | 0.74 | 1.9% | 9.0% | 5.9% | 7.5% | 6.7% | 1.53× | <0.001 |
| Hypothetical protein PF10_0325 | [PDB: | 33.2 | 5.6 | 1 | 380 | 7 | 33% | 1.08 | 1.11 | 1.04 | 0.93 | 1.5% | 7.0% | 11.7% | 14.8% | 9.4% | 1.2× | 0.107 |
| 2 | 497 | 8 | 33% | 1.13 | 1.09 | 0.99 | 0.88 | 5.8% | 4.9% | 18.7% | 17.9% | 11.9% | 1.28× | 0.097 | ||||
| Hypothetical protein PFF1295w | [PDB: | 43.9 | 7.2 | - | 245 | 5 | 20% | 1.06 | 1.04 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 2.2% | 7.1% | 13.7% | 5.0% | 6.0% | 1.16× | 0.072 |
| Hypothetical protein PFI1270w | [PDB: | 24.9 | 5.5 | 1 | 332 | 6 | 21% | 1.31 | 0.98 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 11.6% | 8.7% | 10.1% | 14.3% | 10.8% | 1.34× | 0.012 |
| 2 | 74 | 3 | 17% | 0.93 | 0.97 | 1.36 | 1.65 | 8.6% | 16.8% | 11.6% | 9.8% | 10.7% | 1.77× | <0.001 | ||||
| M1AP | [PDB: | 126.6 | 7.3 | - | 171 | 7 | 10% | 1.47 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 12.2% | 8.7% | 13.4% | 10.9% | 11.5% | 1.69× | <0.001 |
| OAT | [PDB: | 46.0 | 6.5 | - | 589 | 9 | 29% | 1.20 | 1.05 | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0.9% | 5.8% | 12.0% | 5.4% | 5.6% | 1.14× | 0.116 |
| PEMT | [PDB: | 31.3 | 5.4 | 1 | 790 | 9 | 46% | 1.07 | 1.12 | 1.09 | 0.89 | 7.2% | 10.3% | 9.6% | 16.7% | 9.9% | 1.26× | 0.049 |
| 2 | 182 | 3 | 14% | 0.76 | 0.97 | 1.13 | 1.05 | 6.2% | 5.8% | 14.0% | 16.3% | 10.1% | 1.49× | 0.003 | ||||
| Proteasome component C8 | [PDB: | 29.7 | 6.4 | 1 | 67 | 1 | 7% | 1.17 | 1.20 | 1.12 | 0.83 | 12.9% | 3.1% | 5.1% | 7.6% | 6.4% | 1.44× | <0.001 |
| 2 | 275 | 4 | 28% | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.82 | 7.4% | 9.2% | 10.8% | 11.2% | 10.0% | 1.2× | 0.072 | ||||
| TCP1a | [PDB: | 60.6 | 6.7 | - | 110 | 5 | 11% | 1.05 | 0.97 | 1.04 | 1.04 | 3.0% | 4.1% | 6.4% | 6.2% | 5.1% | 1.08× | 0.190 |
| TPI | [PDB: | 28.1 | 6.0 | 1 | 579 | 8 | 43% | 1.18 | 1.13 | 1.04 | 0.86 | 6.1% | 4.5% | 11.8% | 9.4% | 7.7% | 1.37× | <0.001 |
| 2 | 578 | 8 | 45% | 1.20 | 1.11 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 7.0% | 5.1% | 10.0% | 9.6% | 8.3% | 1.37× | <0.001 | ||||
| Uridine phosphorylase | [PDB: | 27.5 | 6.1 | - | 430 | 7 | 35% | 1.23 | 1.16 | 1.09 | 0.73 | 5.2% | 3.6% | 7.0% | 6.5% | 5.8% | 1.68× | <0.001 |
The average volume ratios represent log2-transformed values and have not been mean-centered around zero. aNomenclature in agreement with Shonhai and coworkers [35]. CA1, human carbonic anhydrase 1; eIF, eukaryotic initiation factor; EXP, exported protein; HETK, hydroxyethylthiazol kinase; HSP, heat shock protein; M1AP, M1-family aminopeptidase; OAT, ornithine aminotransferase; PEMT, phosphoethanolamine N-methyltransferase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TCP1a, T-complex protein 1, α subunit; TPI, triose phosphate isomerase.
Figure 4Overview of relative protein abundance dynamics during the . The 278 differential gel electrophoresis (DIGE) protein expression profiles that exhibit a statistically significant change (analysis of variance [ANOVA] P < 0.01) and a considerable maximum fold change (>1.4×) across the P. falciparum schizont development were grouped according to the direction of abundance change (see Figure 3b) and subsequently subjected to hierarchical clustering, with the icons in the upper right corner of each panel providing a generic illustration of each category.
Figure 5Expression profiles comparing relative mRNA and protein abundance. The panels summarize mRNA and protein abundance data for individual P. falciparum genes, with PlasmoDB accession numbers indicated below the gene names. Both the relative mRNA and protein abundance levels determined in this study for four schizont-stage time points (TPs) are based on the same parasite samples from a single large-scale in vitro culture and are indicated by gray and colored lines (see panel legends), respectively. In addition, the previously published transcript dynamics across the whole intra-erythrocytic life cycle [2] are included as black lines, with the black dots representing the corresponding raw data. All abundance profiles were mean-centered around zero based on the data points between 34 and 46 hours post-invasion. Asterisks in the panel legends denote cases for which analysis of variance (ANOVA) P < 0.01 and maximum fold change >1.4×. The insert in the eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)5A panel depicts actual two-dimensional gel images to provide an approximate impression of absolute protein abundance levels between the three eIF5A isoforms.
Figure 6Immunoblot analysis of enolase and eIF5A in . (a) Two-dimensional Western blot of enolase. (b) One-dimensional Western blot of enolase. (c) Two-dimensional Western blot of eukaryotic initiation factor 5A (eIF5A). The upper panel shows the blotted nitrocellulose membrane after staining with a reversible protein dye (MemCode; Pierce), whereas the lower panel depicts the resulting immunoblot after detection with antibodies raised against a plant eIF5A. (d) One-dimensional Western blot of eIF5A. For each two-dimensional blot, 500 μg parasite protein (time point [TP]3, 42 hours post-invasion) was separated on a 13 cm isoelectric focusing (IEF) strip pH 4 to 7 (GE Healthcare) followed by an 11% polyacrylamide gel. Protein spots that could be matched on silver-stained gels were confirmed as P. falciparum enolase (panel a) and eIF5A (panel c) by tandem mass spectrometry and are indicated by arrowheads. For the one-dimensional blots, each lane was loaded with 10 μg parasite protein from the corresponding time point sample. eIF, eukaryotic initiation factor.