Literature DB >> 19090607

Patient, physician, and practice characteristics related to patient enablement in general practice in Croatia: cross-sectional survey study.

Zlata Ozvacić Adzić1, Milica Katić, Josipa Kern, Durdica Lazić, Venija Cerovecki Nekić, Dragan Soldo.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the quality of general practice care in Croatia by using patient enablement as a consultation outcome measure and its association with patient, physician, and practice characteristics.
METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study performed from November 2003 to March 2004 included a national stratified random sample of 350 general practitioners, who were asked to collect data on 50 consecutive consultations with their patients aged > or =18 years. Patients provided data on patient enablement (Patient Enablement Instrument, score range 0-12), consultation length, sociodemographic data, how well they knew the physician, health self-assessment, quality of life, and reason for the visit. Physicians provided data on age, sex, vocational training, working experience, educational work, average number of patients per day, and type of practice.
RESULTS: In 5527 patients, the mean score (+/-standard deviation) for enablement at consultation was 6.6+/-3.3 and the mean consultation length was 11.5+/-5.5 minutes. Logistic regression analysis showed that lack of continuity of care (men: OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47-0.67; women: OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.45-0.61), poor self-perceived health (men: OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.49-2.07; women: OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.53-2.04), low educational level, low quality of life for both sexes and older age in male patients predicted low enablement (P<0.05 for each). Physician age, sex, and average number of patients per day were significantly correlated with enablement for male patients and physician working experience with enablement for female patients (P<0.05 for each).
CONCLUSION: Patient enablement score in Croatia is high in comparison with countries such as the UK and Poland. Enablement at consultations was related to the continuity of care and patient health status, and other patient, physician, and practice characteristics, suggesting that these parameters should be considered when assessing quality of care in general practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19090607      PMCID: PMC2621031          DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2008.49.813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Croat Med J        ISSN: 0353-9504            Impact factor:   1.351


  26 in total

1.  Defining quality of care.

Authors:  S M Campbell; M O Roland; S A Buetow
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Socio-economic characteristics of adult frequent attenders in general practice: secondary analysis of data.

Authors:  B Scaife; P Gill; P Heywood; R Neal
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 3.  Quality, core values and the general practice consultation: issues of definition, measurement and delivery.

Authors:  J G R Howie; D Heaney; M Maxwell
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  Measuring quality in general practice. Pilot study of a needs, process and outcome measure.

Authors:  J G Howie; D J Heaney; M Maxwell
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1997-02

5.  The importance of empathy in the enablement of patients attending the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital.

Authors:  Stewart W Mercer; David Reilly; Graham C M Watt
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Family medicine in Croatia: past, present, and forthcoming challenges.

Authors:  Milica Katić; Vesna Juresa; Stjepan Oresković
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 7.  A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain.

Authors:  M Wensing; H P Jung; J Mainz; F Olesen; R Grol
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians' participatory decision-making style. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  S H Kaplan; B Gandek; S Greenfield; W Rogers; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Factors associated with enablement in general practice: cross-sectional study using routinely-collected data.

Authors:  Nicola Mead; Peter Bower; Martin Roland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Factors that influence the patient centredness of a consultation.

Authors:  S A Law; N Britten
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.386

View more
  19 in total

1.  Factors affecting patient enablement in an Asian setting: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Jason Meng Huey Chan; Andrew Hao Sen Fang; Mitesh Shah
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Illness perception and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes: cross-sectional questionnaire study.

Authors:  Goranka Petricek; Mladenka Vrcic-Keglevic; Gorka Vuletic; Venija Cerovecki; Zlata Ozvacic; Lucija Murgic
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.351

3.  Health Services Management in Turkey: Failure or Success?

Authors:  Abdulbari Bener; Nihat Alayoglu; Funda Çatan; Perihan Torun; Esra S Yilmaz
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2019-03-05

4.  The Patient Enablement Instrument-French version in a family practice setting: a reliability study.

Authors:  Catherine Hudon; Martin Fortin; Francis Rossignol; Susie Bernier; Marie-Eve Poitras
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Patient enablement requires physician empathy: a cross-sectional study of general practice consultations in areas of high and low socioeconomic deprivation in Scotland.

Authors:  Stewart W Mercer; Bhautesh D Jani; Margaret Maxwell; Samuel Y S Wong; Graham C M Watt
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Family physician clinical inertia in glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Valerija Bralić Lang; Biserka Bergman Marković; Ksenija Kranjčević
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-02-05

7.  Reasons for elderly patients GP visits: results of a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Thomas Frese; Jarmila Mahlmeister; Tobias Deutsch; Hagen Sandholzer
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.458

8.  Preferences, predictions and patient enablement: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Carl J Brusse; Laurann E Yen
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in primary care: an observational pilot study of seven generic instruments.

Authors:  Jan-Willem Weenink; Jozé Braspenning; Michel Wensing
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 10.  International variations in primary care physician consultation time: a systematic review of 67 countries.

Authors:  Greg Irving; Ana Luisa Neves; Hajira Dambha-Miller; Ai Oishi; Hiroko Tagashira; Anistasiya Verho; John Holden
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.