Nicola Mead1, Peter Bower, Martin Roland. 1. National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester. nicki.mead@manchester.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quality-improvement activities are most often focused on clinical quality indicators. However, patient evaluations are important additional indicators of the quality of general practice consultations, including measures of satisfaction or enablement (that is, the extent to which the consultation enhances the patient's feelings of confidence and ability to cope). There is limited evidence concerning factors associated with enablement in UK general practice. AIM: To identify patient and practice characteristics associated with enablement scores following general practice consultations. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional survey using a large routinely-collected dataset of patient evaluations of general practice (190,038 individual patient responses). SETTING: A total of 1031 UK general practices. METHOD: Relationships between health, demographic factors, evaluations of general practice care, and patient self-reported enablement were estimated using multiple regression. RESULTS: The primary predictor of enablement was positive patient evaluation of the GPs' communication. Reported continuity of care accounted for a lower proportion of the variance. Of the included patient demographic variables, ethnicity was a key predictor, with patients from minority ethnic groups reporting greater enablement once other factors were controlled. CONCLUSION: The current results provide support for the construct validity of the enablement measure. However, if enablement is to become a valid and useful measure of quality, it is necessary to understand the mechanisms by which enablement is increased in certain patients and practices. Detailed qualitative research may also be required to explain the relatively high scores of ethnic minority responders, despite lower overall satisfaction scores, and to understand why some items included in the enablement measure are regarded as 'not applicable' by a substantial minority of patients.
BACKGROUND: Quality-improvement activities are most often focused on clinical quality indicators. However, patient evaluations are important additional indicators of the quality of general practice consultations, including measures of satisfaction or enablement (that is, the extent to which the consultation enhances the patient's feelings of confidence and ability to cope). There is limited evidence concerning factors associated with enablement in UK general practice. AIM: To identify patient and practice characteristics associated with enablement scores following general practice consultations. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional survey using a large routinely-collected dataset of patient evaluations of general practice (190,038 individual patient responses). SETTING: A total of 1031 UK general practices. METHOD: Relationships between health, demographic factors, evaluations of general practice care, and patient self-reported enablement were estimated using multiple regression. RESULTS: The primary predictor of enablement was positive patient evaluation of the GPs' communication. Reported continuity of care accounted for a lower proportion of the variance. Of the included patient demographic variables, ethnicity was a key predictor, with patients from minority ethnic groups reporting greater enablement once other factors were controlled. CONCLUSION: The current results provide support for the construct validity of the enablement measure. However, if enablement is to become a valid and useful measure of quality, it is necessary to understand the mechanisms by which enablement is increased in certain patients and practices. Detailed qualitative research may also be required to explain the relatively high scores of ethnic minority responders, despite lower overall satisfaction scores, and to understand why some items included in the enablement measure are regarded as 'not applicable' by a substantial minority of patients.
Authors: Anne Kennedy; David Reeves; Peter Bower; Victoria Lee; Elizabeth Middleton; Gerry Richardson; Caroline Gardner; Claire Gately; Anne Rogers Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: John G R Howie; David J Heaney; Margaret Maxwell; George K Freeman; Stewart W Mercer Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Peter Bower; Anne Kennedy; David Reeves; Anne Rogers; Tom Blakeman; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Robert Bowen; Martin Eden; Caroline Gardner; Mark Hann; Victoria Lee; Rebecca Morris; Joanne Protheroe; Gerry Richardson; Caroline Sanders; Angela Swallow; David Thompson Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Stewart W Mercer; Bhautesh D Jani; Margaret Maxwell; Samuel Y S Wong; Graham C M Watt Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2012-02-08 Impact factor: 2.497