B Scaife1, P Gill, P Heywood, R Neal. 1. Sub-Unit for Medical Statistics, Nuffield Institute for Health and Centre for Research in Primary Care, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to determine the effect of a range of socio-economic features on frequent attendance in general practice from a large database of general practice consultations using two definitions of frequent attendance. METHODS: Secondary analyses were carried out of data from the Fourth National Survey of Morbidity in General Practice covering 60 general practices in England and Wales. A total of 283 842 adult patients and their consultations between September 1991 and August 1992 were examined. The main outcome measure was the odds ratio of being a frequent attender (95% confidence intervals). RESULTS: Using a definition of 12+ consultations/year, men were less likely to be frequent attenders (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.13-0.17); however, the difference between men and women lessens with age. Patients who were more likely to be frequent attenders included those who were divorced or widowed (1.41, 1.31-1.51); from social classes IIIM (1.23, 1.17-1.29) and IV/V (1.33, 1.26-1.41); South Asian people (1.38, 1.16-1.65); or unemployed (1.61, 1.46-1.77). Other factors signifying isolation or poverty were also linked to frequent attendance. Using the definition of '6+ consultations for minor problems' produced broadly similar results although the relative weight of the factors showed some differences. CONCLUSIONS: Socio-economic factors were important indicators of frequent attendance in general practice. Results were very similar using either definition, suggesting that both are valid for further work. Furthermore, frequent attendance is a complex process associated with many factors outside the control of the GP.
OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to determine the effect of a range of socio-economic features on frequent attendance in general practice from a large database of general practice consultations using two definitions of frequent attendance. METHODS: Secondary analyses were carried out of data from the Fourth National Survey of Morbidity in General Practice covering 60 general practices in England and Wales. A total of 283 842 adult patients and their consultations between September 1991 and August 1992 were examined. The main outcome measure was the odds ratio of being a frequent attender (95% confidence intervals). RESULTS: Using a definition of 12+ consultations/year, men were less likely to be frequent attenders (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.13-0.17); however, the difference between men and women lessens with age. Patients who were more likely to be frequent attenders included those who were divorced or widowed (1.41, 1.31-1.51); from social classes IIIM (1.23, 1.17-1.29) and IV/V (1.33, 1.26-1.41); South Asian people (1.38, 1.16-1.65); or unemployed (1.61, 1.46-1.77). Other factors signifying isolation or poverty were also linked to frequent attendance. Using the definition of '6+ consultations for minor problems' produced broadly similar results although the relative weight of the factors showed some differences. CONCLUSIONS: Socio-economic factors were important indicators of frequent attendance in general practice. Results were very similar using either definition, suggesting that both are valid for further work. Furthermore, frequent attendance is a complex process associated with many factors outside the control of the GP.
Authors: Richard D Neal; Nasreen Ali; Karl Atkin; Victoria L Allgar; Shahid Ali; Tim Coleman Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Barbara Zappe Pasturel; Raul Cruz-Cano; Rachel E Rosenberg Goldstein; Amanda Palmer; David Blythe; Patricia Ryan; Brenna Hogan; Carrianne Jung; Sam W Joseph; Min Qi Wang; Mei-Ling Ting Lee; Robin Puett; Amy R Sapkota Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Juan V Luciano; Ana Fernández; Alejandra Pinto-Meza; Leila Luján; Juan A Bellón; Javier García-Campayo; María T Peñarrubia; Rita Fernández; Marta Sanavia; María E Blanco; Josep M Haro; Diego J Palao; Antoni Serrano-Blanco Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Navneet Kapur; Isabelle Hunt; Mark Lunt; John McBeth; Francis Creed; Gary Macfarlane Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Carri Hand; Mary Ann McColl; Richard Birtwhistle; Jyoti A Kotecha; Diane Batchelor; Karen Hall Barber Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.275