Literature DB >> 25339717

Fluctuations in neighbourhood fertility generate variable signalling effort.

Conor C Taff1, Gail L Patricelli2, Corey R Freeman-Gallant3.   

Abstract

Studies of sexual signalling generally focus on interactions between dyadic pairs, yet communication in natural populations often occurs in the context of complex social networks. The ability to survey social environments and adjust signal production appropriately should be a critical component of success in these systems, but has rarely been documented empirically. Here, we used autonomous recording devices to identify 118 472 songs produced by 26 male common yellowthroats (Geothlypis trichas) over two breeding seasons, coupled with detailed surveys of social conditions on each territory. We found strong evidence that common yellowthroat males adjusted their total song production in response to both changes in within-pair social context and changes in the fertility of neighbouring females up to 400 m away. Within the social pair, males drastically reduced their song production when mated, but the magnitude of this reduction depended on both the time of day and on the fertility status of the social mate. By contrast, when fertile females were present on nearby territories, males increased their song output, especially during daytime singing. At this time, it is unclear whether males actively gathered information on neighbouring female fertility or whether the patterns that we observed were driven by changes in social interactions that varied with neighbourhood fertility. Regardless of the mechanism employed, however, subtle changes in the social environment generated substantial variation in signalling effort.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autonomous recording; communication networks; sexual signalling

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25339717      PMCID: PMC4213657          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  17 in total

1.  Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds.

Authors:  Daniel J Mennill; Laurene M Ratcliffe; Peter T Boag
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Swamp sparrows modulate vocal performance in an aggressive context.

Authors:  Adrienne L DuBois; Stephen Nowicki; William A Searcy
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Biological markets.

Authors:  R Noë; P Hammerstein
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Male displays adjusted to female's response.

Authors:  Gail L Patricelli; J Albert C Uy; Gregory Walsh; Gerald Borgia
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  An experimental test of the testosterone mediated oxidation handicap hypothesis in a wild bird.

Authors:  Conor C Taff; Corey R Freeman-Gallant
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  Sexual selection, multiple male ornaments, and age- and condition-dependent signaling in the common yellowthroat.

Authors:  Corey R Freeman-Gallant; Conor C Taff; Douglas F Morin; Peter O Dunn; Linda A Whittingham; Susan M Tsang
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Do great tits assess rivals by combining direct experience with information gathered by eavesdropping?

Authors:  T M Peake; A M R Terry; P K McGregor; T Dabelsteen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Spatial distribution of nests constrains the strength of sexual selection in a warbler.

Authors:  C C Taff; C R Freeman-Gallant; P O Dunn; L A Whittingham
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alison M Bell; Shala J Hankison; Kate L Laskowski
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Social context-induced song variation affects female behavior and gene expression.

Authors:  Sarah C Woolley; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.