Literature DB >> 12760614

Postrecognition of interleaved melodies as an indirect measure of auditory stream formation.

Caroline Bey1, Stephen McAdams.   

Abstract

Primitive processes involved in auditory stream formation are measured with indirect, objective method. A target melody interleaved with a distractor sequence is followed by a probe melody that was identical to the target or differed by 2 notes. Listeners decided whether the probe melody was present or not in the composite sequence. Interleaved melody recognition is not possible when distractor sequences have the same mean frequency and maximum contour crossover with target melodies. Performance increases with mean frequency separation and timbral dissimilarity and is unaffected by the duration of the silent interval between composite sequence and probe melody. The relation between this indirect task measuring the interleaved melody recognition boundary and direct judgments measuring the fission boundary is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12760614     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  13 in total

1.  Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream integration and segregation.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-24

2.  Attentional modulation of electrophysiological activity in auditory cortex for unattended sounds within multistream auditory environments.

Authors:  E S Sussman; A S Bregman; W J Wang; F J Khan
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Neurophysiological evidence for context-dependent encoding of sensory input in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Elyse Sussman; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Cognitive resources are distributed among the entire auditory landscape in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Renee M Symonds; Juin W Zhou; Sally L Cole; Kelin M Brace; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Behavioral measures of auditory streaming in ferrets (Mustela putorius).

Authors:  Ling Ma; Christophe Micheyl; Pingbo Yin; Andrew J Oxenham; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Auditory Stream Segregation in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Benefits and Downsides of Superior Perceptual Processes.

Authors:  Lucie Bouvet; Laurent Mottron; Sylviane Valdois; Sophie Donnadieu
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-05

7.  Neural representations of auditory input accommodate to the context in a dynamically changing acoustic environment.

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 8.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  A Detection-Theoretic Analysis of Auditory Streaming and Its Relation to Auditory Masking.

Authors:  An-Chieh Chang; Robert Lutfi; Jungmee Lee; Inseok Heo
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Assessing Top-Down and Bottom-Up Contributions to Auditory Stream Segregation and Integration With Polyphonic Music.

Authors:  Niels R Disbergen; Giancarlo Valente; Elia Formisano; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.