Literature DB >> 19087011

The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.

S Eschertzhuber1, J Brimacombe, M Hohlrieder, C Keller.   

Abstract

The LMA Supreme is a new extraglottic airway device which brings together features of the LMA ProSeal, Fastrach and Unique. We test the hypothesis that ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, fibreoptic position and ease of gastric tube placement differ between the LMA ProSeal and the LMA Supreme in paralysed anesthetised patients. Ninety-three females aged 19-71 years were studied. Both devices were inserted into each patient in random order. Two attempts were allowed. Digital insertion was used for the first attempt and guided insertion for the second attempt. Oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position were determined during cuff inflation from 0 to 40 ml in 10 ml increments. Gastric tube insertion was attempted if there was no gas leak from the drain tube. First attempt and overall insertion success were similar (LMA ProSeal, 92% and 100%; LMA Supreme 95% and 100%). Guided insertion was always successful following failed digital insertion. Oropharyngeal leak pressure was 4-8 ml higher for the LMA ProSeal over the inflation range (p < 0.001). Intracuff pressure was 16-35 cm higher for the LMA ProSeal when the cuff volume was 20-40 ml (p < 0.001). There was an increase in oropharyngeal leak pressure with increasing cuff volume from 10 to 30 ml for both devices, but no change from 0 to 10 ml and 30-40 ml. There were no differences in the fibreoptic position of the airway or drain tube. The first attempt and overall insertion success for the gastric tube was similar (LMA ProSeal 91% and 100%; LMA Supreme 92% and 100%). We conclude that ease of insertion, gastric tube placement and fibreoptic position are similar for the LMA ProSeal and LMA Supreme in paralysed, anaesthetised females, but oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure are higher for the LMA ProSeal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19087011     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05682.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of Supreme(®) and Soft Seal(®) laryngeal masks for airway management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in novice doctors: a manikin study.

Authors:  Hanako Kohama; Nobuyasu Komasawa; Ryusuke Ueki; Aoi Samma; Masashi Nakagawa; Shin-ichi Nishi; Yoshiroh Kaminoh
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Comparison of LM-Supreme™ and endotracheal tube in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Bahar Kuvaki; Şule Özbilgin; Sakize Ferim Günenç; Burcu Ataseven Küçük
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Supreme® and Soft Seal® for airway management in several positions.

Authors:  Nobuyasu Komasawa; Ryusuke Ueki; Akari Fujii; Aoi Samma; Masashi Nakagawa; Shin-ich Nishi; Yoshiroh Kaminoh
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel, LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in elective surgery.

Authors:  Geoffrey Haw Chieh Liew; Esther Dawen Yu; Shitalkumar Sharad Shah; Harikrishnan Kothandan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  Bronchoscope-guided intubation through a Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme in a patient with a difficult-to-manage airway.

Authors:  Michele Carron; Ulderico Freo; Carlo Ori
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Comparison of Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway during Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Tülay Hoşten; Tülay Şahin Yıldız; Alparslan Kuş; Mine Solak; Kamil Toker
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.021

7.  Effect-site concentration of propofol required for LMA-Supreme™ insertion with and without remifentanil: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Matilde Zaballos; Emilia Bastida; Salomé Agustí; Maite Portas; Consuelo Jiménez; Maite López-Gil
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.

Authors:  Ajay Kumar Pajiyar; Zhiting Wen; Haiyun Wang; Lin Ma; Lumin Miao; Guolin Wang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit.

Authors:  Emilie Acx; Els Van Caelenberg; Luc De Baerdemaeker; Marc Coppens
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-15

10.  Randomised comparison of the effectiveness of the laryngeal mask airway supreme, i-gel and current practice in the initial airway management of prehospital cardiac arrest (REVIVE-Airways): a feasibility study research protocol.

Authors:  Jonathan Richard Benger; Sarah Voss; David Coates; Rosemary Greenwood; Jerry Nolan; Steven Rawstorne; Megan Rhys; Matthew Thomas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.