PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and response rate of bortezomib with concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide in the treatment of patients with central nervous system malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This open-label, dose-escalation, Phase I clinical study evaluated the safety of three dose levels of intravenously administered bortezomib (0.7, 1.0, and 1.3 mg/m(2)/dose) on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle, in addition to concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide at a daily dose of 75 mg/m(2) starting on Day 1. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity, defined as any Grade 4-5 toxicity or Grade 3 toxicity directly attributable to protocol treatment, requiring hospitalization and/or radiotherapy interruption. The secondary endpoints included feasibility, non-dose-limiting toxicity, and treatment response. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were enrolled, 23 of whom had high-grade glioma (10 recurrent and 13 newly diagnosed). No dose-limiting toxicities were noted in any dose group, including the highest (1.3 mg/m(2)/dose). The most frequent toxicities were Grade 1 and 2 stomatitis, erythema, and alopecia. All 27 patients were evaluable for response. At a median follow-up of 15.0 months, 9 patients were still alive, with a median survival of 17.4 months for all patients and 15.0 months for patients with high-grade glioma. CONCLUSION: Bortezomib administered at its typical "systemic" dose (1.3 mg/m(2)) is well tolerated and safe combined with temozolomide and radiotherapy when used in the treatment of central nervous system malignancies. A Phase II study to characterize efficacy is warranted.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and response rate of bortezomib with concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide in the treatment of patients with central nervous system malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This open-label, dose-escalation, Phase I clinical study evaluated the safety of three dose levels of intravenously administered bortezomib (0.7, 1.0, and 1.3 mg/m(2)/dose) on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle, in addition to concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide at a daily dose of 75 mg/m(2) starting on Day 1. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity, defined as any Grade 4-5 toxicity or Grade 3 toxicity directly attributable to protocol treatment, requiring hospitalization and/or radiotherapy interruption. The secondary endpoints included feasibility, non-dose-limiting toxicity, and treatment response. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were enrolled, 23 of whom had high-grade glioma (10 recurrent and 13 newly diagnosed). No dose-limiting toxicities were noted in any dose group, including the highest (1.3 mg/m(2)/dose). The most frequent toxicities were Grade 1 and 2 stomatitis, erythema, and alopecia. All 27 patients were evaluable for response. At a median follow-up of 15.0 months, 9 patients were still alive, with a median survival of 17.4 months for all patients and 15.0 months for patients with high-grade glioma. CONCLUSION:Bortezomib administered at its typical "systemic" dose (1.3 mg/m(2)) is well tolerated and safe combined with temozolomide and radiotherapy when used in the treatment of central nervous system malignancies. A Phase II study to characterize efficacy is warranted.
Authors: Primo N Lara; Kari Chansky; Angela M Davies; Wilbur A Franklin; Paul H Gumerlock; Perry P Guaglianone; James N Atkins; Nichole Farneth; Philip C Mack; John J Crowley; David R Gandara Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Primo N Lara; Mariana Koczywas; David I Quinn; Heinz Josef Lenz; Angela M Davies; Derick H M Lau; Paul H Gumerlock; Jeff Longmate; James H Doroshow; David Schenkein; Oscar Kashala; David R Gandara Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Richard I Fisher; Steven H Bernstein; Brad S Kahl; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Michael J Robertson; Sven de Vos; Elliot Epner; Amrita Krishnan; John P Leonard; Sagar Lonial; Edward A Stadtmauer; Owen A O'Connor; Hongliang Shi; Anthony L Boral; André Goy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-09-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael P Fanucchi; Frank V Fossella; Robert Belt; Ronald Natale; Panos Fidias; David P Carbone; Ramaswamy Govindan; Luis E Raez; Francisco Robert; Maria Ribeiro; Wallace Akerley; Karen Kelly; Steven A Limentani; Jeffrey Crawford; Hans-Joachim Reimers; Rita Axelrod; Oscar Kashala; Shihong Sheng; Joan H Schiller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ronald Koschny; Heidrun Holland; Jaromir Sykora; Tobias L Haas; Martin R Sprick; Tom M Ganten; Wolfgang Krupp; Manfred Bauer; Peter Ahnert; Jürgen Meixensberger; Henning Walczak Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-06-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jinte Middeldorp; Willem Kamphuis; Jacqueline A Sluijs; Dalila Achoui; Cathalijn H C Leenaars; Matthijs G P Feenstra; Paula van Tijn; David F Fischer; Celia Berkers; Huib Ovaa; Roy A Quinlan; Elly M Hol Journal: FASEB J Date: 2009-03-30 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Xiao-Tang Kong; Nhung T Nguyen; Yoon J Choi; Guicheng Zhang; HuyTram N Nguyen; Emese Filka; Stacey Green; William H Yong; Linda M Liau; Richard M Green; Tania Kaprealian; Whitney B Pope; P Leia Nghiemphu; Timothy Cloughesy; Andrew Lassman; Albert Lai Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: E M Dunbar; B S Coats; A L Shroads; T Langaee; A Lew; J R Forder; J J Shuster; D A Wagner; P W Stacpoole Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Stella Sun; Derek Lee; Amy S W Ho; Jenny K S Pu; X Q Zhang; Nikki P Lee; Philip J R Day; W M Lui; C F Fung; Gilberto K K Leung Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 12.300