PURPOSE: Evaluate response rate, duration of response (DOR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety of bortezomib treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) was administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle, for up to 17 cycles. Response and progression were determined using International Workshop Response Criteria, both using data from independent radiology review and by the investigators. Primary efficacy analyses were based on data from independent radiology review. RESULTS: In total, 155 patients were treated. Median number of prior therapies was one (range, one to three). Response rate in 141 assessable patients was 33% including 8% complete response (CR)/unconfirmed CR. Median DOR was 9.2 months. Median TTP was 6.2 months. Results by investigator assessments were similar. Median OS has not been reached after a median follow-up of 13.4 months. The safety profile of bortezomib was similar to previous experience in relapsed multiple myeloma. The most common adverse events grade 3 or higher were peripheral neuropathy (13%), fatigue (12%), and thrombocytopenia (11%). Death from causes that were considered to be treatment related was reported for 3% of patients. CONCLUSION: These results confirm the activity of bortezomib in relapsed or refractory MCL, with predictable and manageable toxicities. Bortezomib provides significant clinical activity in terms of durable and complete responses, and may therefore represent a new treatment option for this population with usually very poor outcome. Studies of bortezomib-based combinations in MCL are ongoing.
PURPOSE: Evaluate response rate, duration of response (DOR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety of bortezomib treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) was administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle, for up to 17 cycles. Response and progression were determined using International Workshop Response Criteria, both using data from independent radiology review and by the investigators. Primary efficacy analyses were based on data from independent radiology review. RESULTS: In total, 155 patients were treated. Median number of prior therapies was one (range, one to three). Response rate in 141 assessable patients was 33% including 8% complete response (CR)/unconfirmed CR. Median DOR was 9.2 months. Median TTP was 6.2 months. Results by investigator assessments were similar. Median OS has not been reached after a median follow-up of 13.4 months. The safety profile of bortezomib was similar to previous experience in relapsed multiple myeloma. The most common adverse events grade 3 or higher were peripheral neuropathy (13%), fatigue (12%), and thrombocytopenia (11%). Death from causes that were considered to be treatment related was reported for 3% of patients. CONCLUSION: These results confirm the activity of bortezomib in relapsed or refractory MCL, with predictable and manageable toxicities. Bortezomib provides significant clinical activity in terms of durable and complete responses, and may therefore represent a new treatment option for this population with usually very poor outcome. Studies of bortezomib-based combinations in MCL are ongoing.
Authors: Hongtao Liu; Jeffrey L Johnson; Greg Koval; Greg Malnassy; Dorie Sher; Lloyd E Damon; Eric D Hsi; Donna Marie Bucci; Charles A Linker; Bruce D Cheson; Wendy Stock Journal: Haematologica Date: 2011-11-18 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Jia Ruan; Peter Martin; Morton Coleman; Richard R Furman; Ken Cheung; Adam Faye; Rebecca Elstrom; Mark Lachs; Katherine A Hajjar; John P Leonard Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: A Goy; S H Bernstein; B S Kahl; B Djulbegovic; M J Robertson; S de Vos; E Epner; A Krishnan; J P Leonard; S Lonial; S Nasta; O A O'Connor; H Shi; A L Boral; R I Fisher Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2008-12-12 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: S S Xing; C C Shen; M P Godard; J J Wang; Y Y Yue; S T Yang; Q Zhao; S B Zhang; T X Wang; X L Yang; P Delafontaine; Y He; Y H Song Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2014-02-10 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: G Hess; U Keller; C W Scholz; M Witzens-Harig; J Atta; C Buske; S Kirschey; C Ruckes; C Medler; C van Oordt; W Klapper; M Theobald; M Dreyling Journal: Leukemia Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 11.528