PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current standard care of treatment for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is never curative and exclusively involves the use of cytoxics upfront (e.g., radiation and chemotherapy). Current clinical protocols involve the use of single-agent targeted therapies, which inhibit specific pathways. Given the functional redundancies present in human tumors and escape mechanisms, it is highly unlikely that such a monotherapy approach will be successful in the treatment of GBM. Future directions of therapy for GBMs will likely involve the use of therapeutic cocktails, including more than one target specific inhibitors based on tumor escape mechanism, genetic, epigenetic and molecular signatures. This review addresses some of the relevant issues. RECENT FINDINGS: Correlative clinical studies from various clinical trials and preclinical studies have provided the meticulous use of chemotherapeutics and radiation based on molecular profiling of tumors. Alkylating agents such as temozolomide lose their efficacy if DNA repair enzyme expression is upregulated. The alternative strategies include targeting the enzyme or one can use poly (ADP) ribose inhibitor to inhibit base excision repair pathway rather than mismatch repair pathway. Currently, several inhibitors in this category are in clinical trials. Next, we have addressed new avenues including radiosensitizers, hypoxia, metabolism, angiogenesis, invasive and infiltrative nature of tumors and potential molecular targets, which can be exploited for clinical trials. Finally, we have included some aspect of genome-wide association studies and correlative analysis and the lessons learned to design better clinical trials. SUMMARY: Advances in profiling the noncoding RNAs, genetic, epigenetic profiles, metabolomics, genomics and proteomics may uncover important resistance mechanisms in GBM. Personalized therapy using various therapeutic cocktails targeting these resistance mechanisms may prove even more effective in the future management of GBMs.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current standard care of treatment for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is never curative and exclusively involves the use of cytoxics upfront (e.g., radiation and chemotherapy). Current clinical protocols involve the use of single-agent targeted therapies, which inhibit specific pathways. Given the functional redundancies present in humantumors and escape mechanisms, it is highly unlikely that such a monotherapy approach will be successful in the treatment of GBM. Future directions of therapy for GBMs will likely involve the use of therapeutic cocktails, including more than one target specific inhibitors based on tumor escape mechanism, genetic, epigenetic and molecular signatures. This review addresses some of the relevant issues. RECENT FINDINGS: Correlative clinical studies from various clinical trials and preclinical studies have provided the meticulous use of chemotherapeutics and radiation based on molecular profiling of tumors. Alkylating agents such as temozolomide lose their efficacy if DNA repair enzyme expression is upregulated. The alternative strategies include targeting the enzyme or one can use poly (ADP) ribose inhibitor to inhibit base excision repair pathway rather than mismatch repair pathway. Currently, several inhibitors in this category are in clinical trials. Next, we have addressed new avenues including radiosensitizers, hypoxia, metabolism, angiogenesis, invasive and infiltrative nature of tumors and potential molecular targets, which can be exploited for clinical trials. Finally, we have included some aspect of genome-wide association studies and correlative analysis and the lessons learned to design better clinical trials. SUMMARY: Advances in profiling the noncoding RNAs, genetic, epigenetic profiles, metabolomics, genomics and proteomics may uncover important resistance mechanisms in GBM. Personalized therapy using various therapeutic cocktails targeting these resistance mechanisms may prove even more effective in the future management of GBMs.
Authors: Christopher E Pelloski; E Lin; Li Zhang; W K Alfred Yung; Howard Colman; Juinn-Lin Liu; Shaio Y Woo; Amy B Heimberger; Dima Suki; Michael Prados; Susan Chang; Fredrick G Barker; Gregory N Fuller; Kenneth D Aldape Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-07-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Arnab Chakravarti; Kathryn Winter; Chin-Lee Wu; Donald Kaufman; Elizabeth Hammond; Matthew Parliament; William Tester; Michael Hagan; David Grignon; Niall Heney; Alan Pollack; Howard Sandler; William Shipley Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-06-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Anastasia Murat; Eugenia Migliavacca; Thierry Gorlia; Wanyu L Lambiv; Tal Shay; Marie-France Hamou; Nicolas de Tribolet; Luca Regli; Wolfgang Wick; Mathilde C M Kouwenhoven; Johannes A Hainfellner; Frank L Heppner; Pierre-Yves Dietrich; Yitzhak Zimmer; J Gregory Cairncross; Robert-Charles Janzer; Eytan Domany; Mauro Delorenzi; Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ajay K Yadav; Jaclyn J Renfrow; Denise M Scholtens; Hehuang Xie; George E Duran; Claudia Bredel; Hannes Vogel; James P Chandler; Arnab Chakravarti; Pierre A Robe; Sunit Das; Adrienne C Scheck; John A Kessler; Marcelo B Soares; Branimir I Sikic; Griffith R Harsh; Markus Bredel Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-07-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: David A Reardon; Karen L Fink; Tom Mikkelsen; Timothy F Cloughesy; Alison O'Neill; Scott Plotkin; Michael Glantz; Paula Ravin; Jeffrey J Raizer; Keith M Rich; David Schiff; William R Shapiro; Susan Burdette-Radoux; Edward J Dropcho; Sabine M Wittemer; Johannes Nippgen; Martin Picard; L Burt Nabors Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-11-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stéphane Oudard; Antoine Carpentier; Eugeniu Banu; François Fauchon; Denis Celerier; Marie F Poupon; Bernard Dutrillaux; Jean M Andrieu; Jean Y Delattre Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: D Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Xiaosong Zhang; Jimmy Cheng-Ho Lin; Rebecca J Leary; Philipp Angenendt; Parminder Mankoo; Hannah Carter; I-Mei Siu; Gary L Gallia; Alessandro Olivi; Roger McLendon; B Ahmed Rasheed; Stephen Keir; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Dana A Busam; Hanna Tekleab; Luis A Diaz; James Hartigan; Doug R Smith; Robert L Strausberg; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Sueli Mieko Oba Shinjo; Hai Yan; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Rachel Karchin; Nick Papadopoulos; Giovanni Parmigiani; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler Journal: Science Date: 2008-09-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Rasha Elmghirbi; Tavarekere N Nagaraja; Stephen L Brown; Swayamprava Panda; Madhava P Aryal; Kelly A Keenan; Hassan Bagher-Ebadian; Glauber Cabral; James R Ewing Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Clark Zhang; Elizabeth A Nance; Panagiotis Mastorakos; Jane Chisholm; Sneha Berry; Charles Eberhart; Betty Tyler; Henry Brem; Jung Soo Suk; Justin Hanes Journal: J Control Release Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Kamalakannan Palanichamy; Krishnan Thirumoorthy; Suman Kanji; Nicolaus Gordon; Rajbir Singh; John R Jacob; Nikhil Sebastian; Kevin T Litzenberg; Disha Patel; Emily Bassett; Brinda Ramasubramanian; Tim Lautenschlaeger; Steven M Fischer; Abhik Ray-Chaudhury; Arnab Chakravarti Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Maria Chiara Lo Greco; Roberto Milazzotto; Rocco Luca Emanuele Liardo; Grazia Acquaviva; Madalina La Rocca; Roberto Altieri; Francesco Certo; Giuseppe Maria Barbagallo; Antonio Basile; Pietro Valerio Foti; Stefano Palmucci; Stefano Pergolizzi; Antonio Pontoriero; Corrado Spatola Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2022-03-22