Literature DB >> 19074591

Detection of chromosome aneuploidies in chorionic villus samples by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Angelique J A Kooper1, Brigitte H W Faas2, Ton Feuth3, Johan W T Creemers4, Hans H Zondervan5, Peter F Boekkooi6, Rik W P Quartero7, Robbert J P Rijnders8, Ineke van der Burgt2, Ad Geurts van Kessel2, Arie P T Smits2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the suitability of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in chorionic villus samples as a replacement for traditional karyotyping for the detection of (an)euploidies of chromosomes 21, 18, 13, X, and Y. Chorionic villus samples were diagnosed by traditional karyotyping using short-term cultures (STC) and long-term cultures (LTC), and by MLPA using kit P095. DNA was extracted after digestion of whole villi with proteinase K and/or trypsin and collagenase. Different cell-dissociation procedures were tested to obtain MLPA results representative of the cytotrophoblast layer and the mesenchymal core. Over 95% of the MLPA results were in concordance with the traditional karyotyping of STC and LTC. Traditional karyotyping revealed seven mosaics. After digestion of whole villi with proteinase K, only abnormal cell lines confined to the STC gave rise to abnormal MLPA results. In one sample, the complete discrepancy between STC and LTC was resolved after enzymatic dissociation of cells from the cytotrophoblast layer and the mesenchymal core. MLPA in chorionic villus samples was found to be a reliable test for the detection of (an)euploidies of chromosomes 21, 18, 13, X, and Y. Whole villi digestion with proteinase K resulted in the over-representation of cytotrophoblasts in the DNA pool. To obtain MLPA results representative for STC and LTC, enzymatic dissociation of cells from the cytotrophoblast layer and mesenchymal core is required.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19074591      PMCID: PMC2607561          DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.070140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  24 in total

1.  The predictive value of findings of the common aneuploidies, trisomies 13, 18 and 21, and numerical sex chromosome abnormalities at CVS: experience from the ACC U.K. Collaborative Study. Association of Clinical Cytogeneticists Prenatal Diagnosis Working Party.

Authors:  K Smith; G Lowther; E Maher; T Hourihan; T Wilkinson; J Wolstenholme
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Authors:  Jan P Schouten; Cathal J McElgunn; Raymond Waaijer; Danny Zwijnenburg; Filip Diepvens; Gerard Pals
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Rapid, high throughput prenatal detection of aneuploidy using a novel quantitative method (MLPA).

Authors:  H R Slater; D L Bruno; H Ren; M Pertile; J P Schouten; K H A Choo
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 4.  A cytogeneticist's perspective on genomic microarrays.

Authors:  Lisa G Shaffer; Bassem A Bejjani
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 15.610

5.  Does confined placental mosaicism affect the fetus?

Authors:  G Simoni; M Fraccaro
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Testing for maternal cell contamination in prenatal samples: a comprehensive survey of current diagnostic practices in 35 molecular diagnostic laboratories.

Authors:  Iris Schrijver; Sarah C Cherny; James L Zehnder
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.568

7.  Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) as a stand-alone test for rapid aneuploidy detection in amniotic fluid cells.

Authors:  Angelique J A Kooper; Brigitte H W Faas; Ellen Kater-Baats; Ton Feuth; Jasper C J A Janssen; Ineke van der Burgt; Fred K Lotgering; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Arie P T Smits
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 8.  Confined placental mosaicism.

Authors:  D K Kalousek; M Vekemans
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Accuracy of cytogenetic findings on chorionic villus sampling (CVS)--diagnostic consequences of CVS mosaicism and non-mosaic discrepancy in centres contributing to EUCROMIC 1986-1992.

Authors:  J M Hahnemann; L O Vejerslev
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies by QF-PCR. Assessment on 18,000 consecutive clinical samples.

Authors:  V Cirigliano; G Voglino; M P Cañadas; A Marongiu; M Ejarque; E Ordoñez; A Plaja; M Massobrio; T Todros; C Fuster; M Campogrande; J Egozcue; M Adinolfi
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 4.025

View more
  4 in total

1.  Is routine karyotyping required in prenatal samples with a molecular or metabolic referral?

Authors:  Angelique Ja Kooper; Jacqueline Jpm Pieters; Brigitte Hw Faas; Lies H Hoefsloot; Ineke van der Burgt; Hans A Zondervan; Arie Pt Smits
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Utility and limitations of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification technique in the detection of cytogenetic abnormalities in products of conception.

Authors:  D Saxena; M Agarwal; D Gupta; S Agrawal; V Das; S R Phadke
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.476

3.  Can we rely on the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification method (MLPA) for prenatal diagnosis?

Authors:  Mir Davood Omrani; Faezeh Azizi; Masoumeh Rajabibazl; Niloufar Safavi Naini; Sara Omrani; Arezo Mona Abbasi; Soraya Saleh Gargari
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-04

4.  Detecting, quantifying, and discriminating the mechanism of mosaic chromosomal aneuploidies using MAD-seq.

Authors:  Yu Kong; Esther R Berko; Anthony Marcketta; Shahina B Maqbool; Claudia A Simões-Pires; David F Kronn; Kenny Q Ye; Masako Suzuki; Adam Auton; John M Greally
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 9.043

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.