Literature DB >> 10521838

The predictive value of findings of the common aneuploidies, trisomies 13, 18 and 21, and numerical sex chromosome abnormalities at CVS: experience from the ACC U.K. Collaborative Study. Association of Clinical Cytogeneticists Prenatal Diagnosis Working Party.

K Smith1, G Lowther, E Maher, T Hourihan, T Wilkinson, J Wolstenholme.   

Abstract

We report 611 non-mosaic and 91 mosaic findings of trisomies 13, 18 and 21, and numerical sex chromosome abnormalities in a series of 20,527 CVS, in the Association of Clinical Cytogeneticists U.K. Collaborative Study, the majority with analysis of both direct preparations and cultured cells. No false-positive results were encountered among the 611 non-mosaic cases, making these findings a very reliable indicator of the fetal karyotype. One false-negative case was reported. In contrast, the 91 mosaic abnormalities were unreliable predictors of fetal abnormality. Many were associated with normal outcomes, but a significant proportion of cases of each individual aneuploidy proved genuine. Mosaicism for 45,X, and trisomies 13 and 18 was disproportionately common. 17 of the mosaic cases showed complete discordance between the karyotype from direct preparations and that from cultured cells. All would have resulted in either a false-positive or a false-negative finding if only one technique had been used. Based on our experience, and that of others, we believe that the highest level of predictive accuracy using CVS can only be achieved if both direct preparation and cell culture are performed. In addition, we continue to recommend that all pregnancies demonstrating mosaicism for these aneuploidies at CVS undergo amniocentesis or fetal blood sampling to differentiate between confined placental mosaicism and true fetal karyotypic abnormality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10521838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  4 in total

1.  Detection of chromosome aneuploidies in chorionic villus samples by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Authors:  Angelique J A Kooper; Brigitte H W Faas; Ton Feuth; Johan W T Creemers; Hans H Zondervan; Peter F Boekkooi; Rik W P Quartero; Robbert J P Rijnders; Ineke van der Burgt; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Arie P T Smits
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Rapid screening for chromosomal aneuploidies using array-MLPA.

Authors:  Jing-Bin Yan; Miao Xu; Can Xiong; Da-Wen Zhou; Zhao-Rui Ren; Ying Huang; Monique Mommersteeg; Rinie van Beuningen; Ying-Tai Wang; Shi-Xiu Liao; Fanyi Zeng; Ying Wu; Yi-Tao Zeng
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 2.103

3.  Positive predictive value of non-invasive prenatal screening for fetal chromosome disorders using cell-free DNA in maternal serum: independent clinical experience of a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Whitney A Neufeld-Kaiser; Edith Y Cheng; Yajuan J Liu
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Detecting, quantifying, and discriminating the mechanism of mosaic chromosomal aneuploidies using MAD-seq.

Authors:  Yu Kong; Esther R Berko; Anthony Marcketta; Shahina B Maqbool; Claudia A Simões-Pires; David F Kronn; Kenny Q Ye; Masako Suzuki; Adam Auton; John M Greally
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 9.043

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.