Literature DB >> 18925610

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) as a stand-alone test for rapid aneuploidy detection in amniotic fluid cells.

Angelique J A Kooper1, Brigitte H W Faas, Ellen Kater-Baats, Ton Feuth, Jasper C J A Janssen, Ineke van der Burgt, Fred K Lotgering, Ad Geurts van Kessel, Arie P T Smits.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the diagnostic application of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) as a stand-alone test for targeted detection of common chromosomal aneuploidies (i.e. 13, 18, 21, X and Y) in amniotic fluid cells in routine prenatal clinical practice.
METHODS: In this evaluation study, the MLPA test using kit P095 was performed on 1000 consecutive amniotic fluid samples and the results obtained were compared with traditional karyotyping (TK), the gold standard.
RESULTS: The absolute specificity and sensitivity of the MLPA test were 100%. The test yielded a rapid reporting time: 94% within three working days and 5% within seven working days. The test failure rate was 0.8%. The percentage of abnormalities undetectable using this specific test was 2.4%: abnormal foetal ultrasound (N=9), increased risk first trimester screening (N=2), advanced maternal age (N=3) or other reason for referral (N=10). These abnormalities can be categorised in clinically significant (N=8), clinically uncertain (N=4) and clinically nonsignificant (N=12).
CONCLUSIONS: MLPA P095 is suitable as a stand-alone test for the rapid and efficient detection of the most common chromosomal aneuploidies in routine prenatal clinical practice. A flow chart for integrating the MLPA test into the cytogenetic laboratory workflow is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18925610     DOI: 10.1002/pd.2111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  6 in total

1.  Detection of chromosome aneuploidies in chorionic villus samples by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Authors:  Angelique J A Kooper; Brigitte H W Faas; Ton Feuth; Johan W T Creemers; Hans H Zondervan; Peter F Boekkooi; Rik W P Quartero; Robbert J P Rijnders; Ineke van der Burgt; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Arie P T Smits
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  SNaPshot Assay in Quantitative Detection of Allelic Nondisjunction in Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Debarati Ghosh; Sailesh Gochhait; Disha Banerjee; Anindita Chatterjee; Swagata Sinha; Krishnadas Nandagopal
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2012-08-29

3.  Economic evaluation of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a cost-minimization analysis.

Authors:  Elisabeth M A Boormans; Erwin Birnie; Mariëtte J V Hoffer; Merryn V E Macville; Robert-Jan Galjaard; Gijsbertha H Schuring-Blom; Shama L Bhola; Karin Huijsdens; Arie Smits; Jan M M van Lith
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Is routine karyotyping required in prenatal samples with a molecular or metabolic referral?

Authors:  Angelique Ja Kooper; Jacqueline Jpm Pieters; Brigitte Hw Faas; Lies H Hoefsloot; Ineke van der Burgt; Hans A Zondervan; Arie Pt Smits
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Women's Attitudes towards the Option to Choose between Karyotyping and Rapid Targeted Testing during Pregnancy.

Authors:  Angelique J A Kooper; Dominique F C M Smeets; Ilse Feenstra; Lia D E Wijnberger; Robbert J P Rijnders; Rik W P Quartero; Peter F Boekkooi; John M G van Vugt; Arie P T Smits
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-04-30

6.  Can we rely on the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification method (MLPA) for prenatal diagnosis?

Authors:  Mir Davood Omrani; Faezeh Azizi; Masoumeh Rajabibazl; Niloufar Safavi Naini; Sara Omrani; Arezo Mona Abbasi; Soraya Saleh Gargari
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.