Literature DB >> 15361554

Rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies by QF-PCR. Assessment on 18,000 consecutive clinical samples.

V Cirigliano1, G Voglino, M P Cañadas, A Marongiu, M Ejarque, E Ordoñez, A Plaja, M Massobrio, T Todros, C Fuster, M Campogrande, J Egozcue, M Adinolfi.   

Abstract

The quantitative fluorescent PCR (QF-PCR) assay, introduced during the last few years, allows prenatal diagnoses of common chromosome aneuploidies in a few hours after sampling. We report the first assessment of QF-PCR performed on a large cohort of 18,000 consecutive clinical specimens analysed in two different Centres. All samples were analysed by QF-PCR using several selected STR markers together with amelogenin and, occasionally, SRY for fetal sexing. Results were compared with those obtained by conventional cytogenetic analysis. In 17,129 tests, normal fetuses were detected by QF-PCR. No false positives were observed. All 732 cases of trisomy 21, 18, 13, triploidies, double trisomies as well as all but one fetuses with X and Y aneuploidies were correctly diagnosed. Chromosome mosaicism could also be suspected in several samples. In some cases of in vitro culture failures, QF-PCR was the only evidence of fetal X, Y, 21, 18 and 13 chromosome complement. QF-PCR proved to be efficient and reliable in detecting major numerical chromosome disorders. The main advantages of the molecular assay are its very low cost, speed and automation enabling a single operator to perform up to 40 assays per day. QF-PCR relieves anxiety of most parents within 24 h from sampling and accelerates therapeutic interventions in the case of an abnormal result. In countries where large scale conventional cytogenetics is hampered by its high cost and lack of technical expertise, QF-PCR may be used as the only prenatal diagnostic test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15361554     DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gah108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod        ISSN: 1360-9947            Impact factor:   4.025


  18 in total

1.  Prenatal detection of unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements by array CGH.

Authors:  L Rickman; H Fiegler; C Shaw-Smith; R Nash; V Cirigliano; G Voglino; B L Ng; C Scott; J Whittaker; M Adinolfi; N P Carter; M Bobrow
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Detection of chromosome aneuploidies in chorionic villus samples by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Authors:  Angelique J A Kooper; Brigitte H W Faas; Ton Feuth; Johan W T Creemers; Hans H Zondervan; Peter F Boekkooi; Rik W P Quartero; Robbert J P Rijnders; Ineke van der Burgt; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Arie P T Smits
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Prenatal diagnosis of i(18q) and dup(18q) cases by quantitative fluorescent PCR.

Authors:  Isabel Castro-Volio; Fernando Ortíz-Morales; Luisa Valle-Bourrouet; Wendy Malespín-Bendaña
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-09-17

4.  A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of cytogenetic and molecular genetic methods in the detection of Down syndrome.

Authors:  Mirela Mačkić-Đurović; Petar Projić; Slavka Ibrulj; Jasmina Cakar; Damir Marjanović
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.363

5.  Mass spectrometric based analysis, characterization and applications of circulating cell free DNA isolated from human body fluids.

Authors:  Vaneet K Sharma; Paul Vouros; James Glick
Journal:  Int J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Celomic Fluid: Laboratory Workflow for Prenatal Diagnosis of Monogenic Diseases.

Authors:  Antonino Giambona; Margherita Vinciguerra; Filippo Leto; Filippo Cassarà; Viviana Tartaglia; Valentina Cigna; Emanuela Orlandi; Francesco Picciotto; Nourah H Al Qahtani; Eman S Alsulmi; Noor B Almandil; Sayed AbdulAzeez; J Francis Borgio; Aurelio Maggio
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.074

7.  Prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies using QF-PCR: the egyptian study.

Authors:  Shereen H Atef; Sawsan S Hafez; Nermein H Mahmoud; Sanaa M Helmy
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2011-10

8.  Application of a target array comparative genomic hybridization to prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Ji Hyeon Park; Jung Hoon Woo; Sung Han Shim; Song-Ju Yang; Young Min Choi; Kap-Seok Yang; Dong Hyun Cha
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.103

9.  Rapid aneuploidy detection with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification: a prospective study of 4000 amniotic fluid samples.

Authors:  Diane Van Opstal; Marjan Boter; Danielle de Jong; Cardi van den Berg; Hennie T Brüggenwirth; Hajo I J Wildschut; Annelies de Klein; Robert-Jan H Galjaard
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Women's Attitudes towards the Option to Choose between Karyotyping and Rapid Targeted Testing during Pregnancy.

Authors:  Angelique J A Kooper; Dominique F C M Smeets; Ilse Feenstra; Lia D E Wijnberger; Robbert J P Rijnders; Rik W P Quartero; Peter F Boekkooi; John M G van Vugt; Arie P T Smits
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.