Literature DB >> 19065651

Longitudinal association of anthropometry with mammographic breast density in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Katherine W Reeves1, Roslyn A Stone, Francesmary Modugno, Roberta B Ness, Victor G Vogel, Joel L Weissfeld, Laurel A Habel, Barbara Sternfeld, Jane A Cauley.   

Abstract

High percent mammographic breast density is strongly associated with increased breast cancer risk. Though body mass index (BMI) is positively associated with risk of postmenopausal breast cancer, BMI is negatively associated with percent breast density in cross-sectional studies. Few longitudinal studies have evaluated associations between BMI and weight and mammographic breast density. We studied the longitudinal relationships between anthropometry and breast density in a prospective cohort of 834 pre- and perimenopausal women enrolled in an ancillary study to the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Routine screening mammograms were collected and read for breast density. Random intercept regression models were used to evaluate whether annual BMI change was associated with changes over time in dense breast area and percent density. The study population was 7.4% African-American, 48.8% Caucasian, 21.8% Chinese, and 21.9% Japanese. Mean follow-up was 4.8 years. Mean annual weight change was +0.32 kg/year, mean change in dense area was -0.77 cm(2)/year, and mean change in percent density was -1.14%/year. In fully adjusted models, annual change in BMI was not significantly associated with changes in dense breast area (-0.17 cm(2), 95% CI -0.64, 0.29). Borderline significant negative associations were observed between annual BMI change and annual percent density change, with percent density decreasing 0.36% (95% CI -0.74, 0.02) for a one unit increase in BMI over a year. This longitudinal study provides modest evidence that changes in BMI are not associated with changes in dense area, yet may be negatively associated with percent density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19065651      PMCID: PMC2683677          DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  29 in total

1.  Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  P A van den Brandt; D Spiegelman; S S Yaun; H O Adami; L Beeson; A R Folsom; G Fraser; R A Goldbohm; S Graham; L Kushi; J R Marshall; A B Miller; T Rohan; S A Smith-Warner; F E Speizer; W C Willett; A Wolk; D J Hunter
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  A longitudinal study of the effects of menopause on mammographic features.

Authors:  Norman Boyd; Lisa Martin; Jennifer Stone; Laurie Little; Salomon Minkin; Martin Yaffe
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Ethnic differences in mammographic densities.

Authors:  G Maskarinec; L Meng; G Ursin
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 4.  Energy balance and cancer: the role of sex hormones.

Authors:  T J Key; N E Allen; P K Verkasalo; E Banks
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.297

5.  Macromastia: how much of it is fat?

Authors:  Norma Cruz-Korchin; Leo Korchin; Carmen González-Keelan; Consuelo Climent; Ilia Morales
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  The association of increased weight, body mass index, and tissue density with the risk of breast carcinoma in Vermont.

Authors:  P B Lam; P M Vacek; B M Geller; H B Muss
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: results from a randomized trial. Canadian Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  N F Boyd; C Greenberg; G Lockwood; L Little; L Martin; J Byng; M Yaffe; D Tritchler
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-04-02       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Secular stability and reliability of measurements of the percentage of dense tissue on mammograms.

Authors:  Jacques Benichou; Celia Byrne; Laura A Capece; Leslie E Carroll; Kathy Hurt-Mullen; David Y Pee; Martine Salane; Catherine Schairer; Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2003

9.  Genetic determinants of mammographic density.

Authors:  Christopher A Haiman; Leslie Bernstein; David Berg; Sue A Ingles; Martine Salane; Giske Ursin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2002-03-25       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Life-course body size and perimenopausal mammographic parenchymal patterns in the MRC 1946 British birth cohort.

Authors:  V A McCormack; I dos Santos Silva; B L De Stavola; N Perry; S Vinnicombe; A J Swerdlow; R Hardy; D Kuh
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  20 in total

1.  Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Biomarker Modulation Study of Vitamin D Supplementation in Premenopausal Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer (SWOG S0812).

Authors:  Katherine D Crew; Garnet L Anderson; Dawn L Hershman; Mary Beth Terry; Parisa Tehranifar; Danika L Lew; Monica Yee; Eric A Brown; Sebastien S Kairouz; Nafisa Kuwajerwala; Therese Bevers; John E Doster; Corrine Zarwan; Laura Kruper; Lori M Minasian; Leslie Ford; Banu Arun; Marian Neuhouser; Gary E Goodman; Powel H Brown
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-05-28

2.  The effect of change in body mass index on volumetric measures of mammographic density.

Authors:  Vicki Hart; Katherine W Reeves; Susan R Sturgeon; Nicholas G Reich; Lynnette Leidy Sievert; Karla Kerlikowske; Lin Ma; John Shepherd; Jeffrey A Tice; Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh; Serghei Malkov; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Longitudinal Study of Mammographic Density Measures That Predict Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Kavitha Krishnan; Laura Baglietto; Jennifer Stone; Julie A Simpson; Gianluca Severi; Christopher F Evans; Robert J MacInnis; Graham G Giles; Carmel Apicella; John L Hopper
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  A method to estimate off-schedule observations in a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Katherine W Reeves; Roslyn A Stone; Francesmary Modugno; Roberta B Ness; Victor G Vogel; Joel L Weissfeld; Laurel A Habel; Marike Vuga; Jane A Cauley
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  The metabolic syndrome and mammographic breast density in a racially diverse and predominantly immigrant sample of women.

Authors:  Parisa Tehranifar; Angeline Protacio; Karen M Schmitt; Elise Desperito; Sabine Oskar; Alan J Potter; Natalie J Engmann; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Adiposity, adult weight gain and mammographic breast density in US Chinese women.

Authors:  Marilyn Tseng; Celia Byrne
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Reproductive and menstrual factors and mammographic density in African American, Caribbean, and white women.

Authors:  Parisa Tehranifar; Diane Reynolds; Julie Flom; Loralee Fulton; Yuyan Liao; Elizabeth Kudadjie-Gyamfi; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Circulating levels of inflammatory markers and mammographic density among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Katherine W Reeves; Joel L Weissfeld; Francesmary Modugno; Brenda Diergaarde
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Effects of isoflavones on breast density in pre- and post-menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lee Hooper; Giri Madhavan; Jeffrey A Tice; Sam J Leinster; Aedín Cassidy
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  Between-Race Differences in Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Before and After Breast Density Notification Law.

Authors:  Mark Manning; Terrance L Albrecht; Suzanne O'Neill; Kristen Purrington
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.532

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.