Literature DB >> 11786793

Macromastia: how much of it is fat?

Norma Cruz-Korchin1, Leo Korchin, Carmen González-Keelan, Consuelo Climent, Ilia Morales.   

Abstract

A total of 25 patients who underwent bilateral breast reduction were included in this study. Each patient's age, weight, height, and amount of breast tissue removed from each breast were recorded. The body mass index was calculated for each patient. On the day of the operation, tissue samples (two each) were taken from the central, lateral, and preaxillary areas of the breast. One of the samples was weighed, placed in a closed glass container, and heated for 10 minutes in a microwave oven at full power. The liquid fat was separated from the solid residue, and the percentage of fat was calculated. The other sample from each area was examined grossly, and representative sections, corresponding to the distribution of fat and connective tissue, were submitted for evaluation. In these samples, the percentage of fat, gland, and connective tissue was estimated using low-magnification light microscopy. In this group of patients (who had an average age of 34 years and who were significantly overweight as determined by a mean body mass index of 28), it was found (using the microwave method) that there was a mean fat percentage of 61 percent in the central breast area, 74 percent in the lateral breast area, and 73 percent in the preaxillary area. Upon microscopic examination, the pathologist reported that fat accounted for 64 percent of the central breast area, 92 percent of the lateral breast area, and 94 percent of the preaxillary area. On average, the central breast area in macromastia patients had only seven percent gland and 29 percent connective tissue. The lateral and preaxillary areas of the breast had one to three percent gland and five percent connective tissue. The two methods had a significant (p < 0.05) positive correlation in the central breast area, but in the lateral and preaxillary regions, the correlation was poor. In the microscopic examination, there was a tendency to overestimate the amount of fat. Both methods of evaluation used in the study concur that the enlarged breast of macromastia consists primarily of fat and that the glandular element is rather small.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11786793     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200201000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

1.  Cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery in adolescents: psychological, ethical, and legal considerations.

Authors:  Canice E Crerand; Leanne Magee
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 2.  Unsolved Mysteries of the Human Mammary Gland: Defining and Redefining the Critical Questions from the Lactation Consultant's Perspective.

Authors:  Lisa Ann Marasco
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.673

3.  Hyperplastic breast anomalies in the female adolescent breast.

Authors:  Erik M Wolfswinkel; Valerie Lemaine; William M Weathers; Chuma J Chike-Obi; Amy S Xue; Lior Heller
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Breast size and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Joel G Ray; Anshu P Mohllajee; Rob M van Dam; Karin B Michels
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Longitudinal association of anthropometry with mammographic breast density in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Authors:  Katherine W Reeves; Roslyn A Stone; Francesmary Modugno; Roberta B Ness; Victor G Vogel; Joel L Weissfeld; Laurel A Habel; Barbara Sternfeld; Jane A Cauley
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Association of Imaging-Based Body Fat Distribution and Mammographic Density in the Multiethnic Cohort Adiposity Phenotype Study.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Michelle Ciba; Dan Ju; John A Shepherd; Thomas Ernst; Anna H Wu; Kristine R Monroe; Unhee Lim; Lynne R Wilkens; Loïc Le Marchand
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.090

7.  The Effects of Reduction Mammaplasty on Serum Leptin Levels and Insulin Resistance.

Authors:  Hakan Uzun; Ozan Bitik; Yahya Baltu; Çiğdem Sönmez; Ayşegül Öztürk Kaymak
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.257

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.