Literature DB >> 1867289

Duty to disclose in medical genetics: a legal perspective.

M Z Pelias1.   

Abstract

As technical knowledge and public information in medical genetics continue to expand, the geneticist may expect to be held responsible for informing patients and clients about new developments in research and diagnosis. The long legal evolution of the physician's duty to disclose, and more recent findings of a physician's duty to recall former patients to inform them about newly discovered risks of treatment, indicate that medical geneticists may have a duty to disclose both current and future information about conditions that are or could be inherited. Recent case law supports findings of professional liability for both present and future disclosure, even in the absence of an active physician-patient relationship. The requirement of candid and complete disclosure will affect the counseling approach in testing for deleterious genes and in providing medical treatment for minors with hereditary diseases. Finding a duty to recall may impose further professional burdens on the geneticist to reach beyond the immediate counseling arena and to recontact patients, perhaps years after their initial visit to genetics clinic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction; Legal Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1867289     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320390320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  18 in total

1.  Questioning the consensus: managing carrier status results generated by newborn screening.

Authors:  Fiona Alice Miller; Jason Scott Robert; Robin Z Hayeems
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  A systematic review of the effects of disclosing carrier results generated through newborn screening.

Authors:  R Z Hayeems; J P Bytautas; F A Miller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Neonatal screening for sickle cell disorders: what about the carrier infants?

Authors:  L Laird; C Dezateux; E N Anionwu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-17

Review 4.  Behavioral genetics '97: ASHG statement. Recent developments in human behavioral genetics: past accomplishments and future directions.

Authors:  S L Sherman; J C DeFries; I I Gottesman; J C Loehlin; J M Meyer; M Z Pelias; J Rice; I Waldman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Disclosing Genetic Information to Family Members About Inherited Cardiac Arrhythmias: An Obligation or a Choice?

Authors:  Rick D Vavolizza; Isha Kalia; Kathleen Erskine Aaron; Louise B Silverstein; Dorit Barlevy; David Wasserman; Christine Walsh; Robert W Marion; Siobhan M Dolan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Adoption, genetic disease, and DNA.

Authors:  P D Turnpenny; S A Simpson; A M McWhinnie
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 7.  The emerging role of the physician in genetic counselling and testing for heritable breast, ovarian and colon cancer.

Authors:  K M Taylor; M J Kelner
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Presymptomatic testing for Huntington disease in the United States.

Authors:  K A Quaid
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  The duty to recontact: attitudes of genetics service providers.

Authors:  J L Fitzpatrick; C Hahn; T Costa; M J Huggins
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Risk reversals in predictive testing for Huntington disease.

Authors:  E Almqvist; S Adam; M Bloch; A Fuller; P Welch; D Eisenberg; D Whelan; D Macgregor; W Meschino; M R Hayden
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.