Literature DB >> 19057965

Prediction of anastomotic leakage after pancreatic head resections by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI).

Dietmar J Dinter1, Niloufar Aramin, Christel Weiss, Christoph Singer, Gerald Weisser, Stefan O Schoenberg, Stefan Post, Marco Niedergethmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The texture of the pancreatic tissue is a main risk factor for leakage after pancreaticojejunostomy and can be differentiated using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI). In order to identify risk factors and to assess the role of pancreatic dMRI, a cohort of patients was retrospectively reviewed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seven consecutive patients were identified in the departmental database and examined by means of a standardized dMRI protocol using a 1.5-T MRI system. Signal intensity (SI) measurements (aorta, body of the pancreas, muscle tissue) were performed in the axial T1-weighted sequences before and after 25 and 60 s after i.v. application of gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid. For all patients with a standardized contrast medium curve in the aorta (n = 72), a muscle-normalized signal intensity curve (SIC) with SI(ratio) was calculated. SI(ratio)s were classified in two groups: rapid increase (SI(ratio) >or= 1.1, early arterial value > portal-venous value, "soft" pancreas) and delayed increase (SI(ratio) <1.1, "firm" or "hard" pancreas). All patients received pancreatic head resection with a duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy. The dMRI data was correlated with prospectively acquired clinical data.
RESULTS: Leakage of the pancreaticojejunostomy occurred more frequently (12/37 vs. two of 35, 32% vs. 6%, p = 0.006) in patients with a rapid increase and an SI(ratio) >or= 1.1 ("soft" pancreas, n = 37) compared to those with delayed perfusion (SI(ratio) <1.1, "hard" pancreas, n = 35). The more severe type B and C anastomotic leakages occurred only in the group of patients with SI(ratio) >or= 1.1. Patients with a rapid increase had significantly better preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists staging, lower carbohydrate antigen 19-9 values, and smaller tumor sizes. Most of them had not only benign tumors but also longer postoperative hospital stay, in comparison to patients with delayed perfusion (SI(ratio) <1.1). Multivariate analysis revealed SI(ratio) of >or=1.1 to be the only preoperative parameter predicting leakage significantly with an odds ratio of 7.9.
CONCLUSION: dMRI with SI(ratio) calculation provided reliable information for the prediction of pancreatic texture. Patients with a SI(ratio) >or= 1.1 had a 7.9-fold increased risk of anastomotic leakage and a prolonged hospital stay. SIC with measurements of SI(ratio) in dMRI could therefore define patients at risk for anastomotic leakage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19057965     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-008-0765-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  43 in total

1.  Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant.

Authors:  M I van Berge Henegouwen; L T De Wit; T M Van Gulik; H Obertop; D J Gouma
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yin-Mo Yang; Xiao-Dong Tian; Yan Zhuang; Wei-Min Wang; Yuan-Lian Wan; Yan-Ting Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Rare indications for a Kausch-Whipple procedure.

Authors:  M Niedergethmann; A Richter; K Wendl; B Schmidt; S Post; M Trede
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2001-02

4.  Proposal for definition and severity grading of pancreatic anastomosis failure and pancreatic occlusion failure.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Jeffrey S Barkun
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging improves the staging of pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  M Trede; B Rumstadt; K Wendl; J Gaa; K Tesdal; K J Lehmann; H J Meier-Willersen; P Pescatore; J Schmoll
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula.

Authors:  John W Lin; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Taylor S Riall; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michelle L DeOliveira; Jordan M Winter; Markus Schafer; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience.

Authors:  Axel Richter; Marco Niedergethmann; Jörg W Sturm; Dietmar Lorenz; Stefan Post; Michael Trede
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  The complications of pancreatectomy.

Authors:  M Trede; G Schwall
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  State-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Wolfgang Schima; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Peter Goetzinger; Martina Scharitzer; Claus Koelblinger
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-12
View more
  11 in total

1.  Risk-adapted anastomosis for partial pancreaticoduodenectomy reduces the risk of pancreatic fistula: a pilot study.

Authors:  Marco Niedergethmann; Niloufar Dusch; Rizky Widyaningsih; Christel Weiss; Peter Kienle; Stefan Post
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Preoperative imaging evaluation of pancreatic pathologies for the objective prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yoshitsugu Tajima; Yasunari Kawabata; Noriyuki Hirahara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Dual-phase computed tomography for assessment of pancreatic fibrosis and anastomotic failure risk following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yasushi Hashimoto; Guido M Sclabas; Naoki Takahashi; Yujiro Kirihara; Thomas C Smyrk; Marianne Huebner; Michael B Farnell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Randomized controlled single-center trial comparing pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after partial pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ulrich F Wellner; Olivia Sick; Manfred Olschewski; Ulrich Adam; Ulrich T Hopt; Tobias Keck
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Correlation between preoperative imaging and intraoperative risk assessment in the prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Farshad Frozanpor; Louiza Loizou; Christoph Ansorge; Lars Lundell; Nils Albiin; Ralf Segersvärd
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Preoperative pancreas CT/MRI characteristics predict fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  F Frozanpor; L Loizou; C Ansorge; R Segersvärd; L Lundell; N Albiin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  A simple scoring system based on clinical factors related to pancreatic texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula preoperatively.

Authors:  Ulrich Friedrich Wellner; Gian Kayser; Hryhoriy Lapshyn; Olivia Sick; Frank Makowiec; Jens Höppner; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Tobias Keck
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  A Simple Method to Evaluate Whether Pancreas Texture Can Be Used to Predict Pancreatic Fistula Risk After Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Samet Yardimci; Yalçın Burak Kara; Davut Tuney; Wafi Attaallah; Mustafa Umit Ugurlu; Ender Dulundu; Şevket Cumhur Yegen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Prediction of pancreatic anastomotic failure after pancreatic head resection using preoperative diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Noriyuki Miyamoto; Satoshi Yabusaki; Keita Sakamoto; Yasuka Kikuchi; Rie Mimura; Fumi Kato; Noriko Oyama-Manabe; Bunya Takahashi; Takeshi Soyama; Daisuke Abo; Yusuke Sakuhara; Kohsuke Kudo; Hiroki Shirato; Toru Nakamura; Takahiro Tsuchikawa; Keisuke Okamura; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.374

10.  Preoperative Computed Tomography to Predict and Stratify the Risk of Severe Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Marta Sandini; Davide Paolo Bernasconi; Davide Ippolito; Luca Nespoli; Melissa Baini; Salvatore Barbaro; Davide Fior; Luca Gianotti
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.