Literature DB >> 19057955

Analysis of patient selection and external validity in the Swedish contribution to the COLOR trial.

Martin Janson1, Gunnar Edlund, Ulf Kressner, Elisabet Lindholm, Lars Påhlman, Stefan Skullman, Bo Anderberg, Eva Haglind.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The colon cancer laparoscopic or open resection (COLOR) trial is an international, randomised controlled trial comparing outcomes of open and laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. The main purpose of this study was to determine representability by comparing included and nonincluded patients in the participating Swedish centres.
DESIGN: At eight centres, which included 391 of the 422 Swedish patients, a local database search was performed to identify retrospectively all patients (n = 2,384) who underwent surgery for colon cancer during the inclusion period, and data was retrieved from medical records.
RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-six patients were randomised, 65 of whom were excluded post randomisation (group 2), leaving 391 patients in the study (group 1). For 1,566 patients, valid exclusion criteria were found (group 3). Thus, 362 patients were eligible but not included (group 4). Relative to group 1, patients in group 4 had a significantly higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, more advanced tumour stage and difference regarding the resections performed. Results showed that 1470 patients (62%) could be calculated as feasible for laparoscopic colon resection (LCR) in a clinical, nontrial situation.
CONCLUSIONS: The study population in the Swedish part of the COLOR trial was representative of the eligible population with the exception of comorbidity, where those actually included had less severe comorbidity than the nonincluded but eligible patients. In Sweden, 50-60% of colon cancer patients can be operated on by laparoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19057955     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0203-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  16 in total

Review 1.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.

Authors:  D Moher; K F Schulz; D Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Does clinical trial subject selection restrict the ability to generalize use and cost of health services to "real life" subjects?

Authors:  Wendy A Kennedy; Claudine Laurier; Jean-Luc Malo; Heberto Ghezzo; Jocelyne L'Archevêque; André-Pierre Contandriopoulos
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer.

Authors:  E Kuhry; H J Bonjer; E Haglind; W C J Hop; R Veldkamp; M A Cuesta; J Jeekel; L Påhlman; M Morino; A Lacy; S Delgado
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The ASA classification of physical status--a recapitulation.

Authors:  A S Keats
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 6.  Threats to applicability of randomised trials: exclusions and selective participation.

Authors:  A Britton; M McKee; N Black; K McPherson; C Sanderson; C Bain
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1999-04

7.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Ka Lau Leung; Samuel P Y Kwok; Steve C W Lam; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Simon S M Ng; Paul B S Lai; Wan Yee Lau
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Juan C García-Valdecasas; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Pilar Taurá; Josep M Piqué; Josep Visa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  9 in total

1.  Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Manish M Tiwari; Jason F Reynoso; Robin High; Albert W Tsang; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection for cancer: results of 5 years of follow-up in a randomized trial.

Authors:  Johnna Schölin; Mark Buunen; Wim Hop; Jaap Bonjer; Bo Anderberg; Miguel Cuesta; Salvadora Delgado; Ainitze Ibarzabal; Marie-Louise Ivarsson; Martin Janson; Antonio Lacy; Johan Lange; Lars Påhlman; Stefan Skullman; Eva Haglind
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Tissue banking in a regional hospital: a promising future concept? First report on fresh frozen tissue banking in a hospital without an integrated institute of pathology.

Authors:  Marco von Strauss und Torney; Ulrich Güller; Farid Rezaeian; Philippe Brosi; Luigi Terracciano; Markus Zuber
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer.

Authors:  Michel Adamina; Mark L Manwaring; Ki-Jae Park; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A Framework for Systematic Assessment of Clinical Trial Population Representativeness Using Electronic Health Records Data.

Authors:  Yingcheng Sun; Alex Butler; Ibrahim Diallo; Jae Hyun Kim; Casey Ta; James R Rogers; Hao Liu; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 2.762

6.  Watchful waiting as a treatment strategy for patients with a ventral hernia appears to be safe.

Authors:  D Kokotovic; H Sjølander; I Gögenur; F Helgstrand
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Lymphoma incidence, survival and prevalence 2004-2014: sub-type analyses from the UK's Haematological Malignancy Research Network.

Authors:  A Smith; S Crouch; S Lax; J Li; D Painter; D Howell; R Patmore; A Jack; E Roman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Improving the external validity of clinical trials: the case of multiple chronic conditions.

Authors:  Fortin Martin; Smith M Susan
Journal:  J Comorb       Date:  2013-12-24

9.  Cohort Profile: The Haematological Malignancy Research Network (HMRN): a UK population-based patient cohort.

Authors:  Alexandra Smith; Debra Howell; Simon Crouch; Dan Painter; John Blase; Han-I Wang; Ann Hewison; Timothy Bagguley; Simon Appleton; Sally Kinsey; Cathy Burton; Russell Patmore; Eve Roman
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.