Literature DB >> 19052669

Canadian quality indicators for percutaneous coronary interventions.

Dennis T Ko1, Harindra C Wijeysundera, Xiaofu Zhu, Janice Richards, Jack V Tu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quantifying adherence to quality indicators can serve as a direct measure of quality of care and provide the foundation for quality improvement. However, quality indicators for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have not been developed in Canada.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a set of quality and outcome indicators for PCI that can be used across Canada.
METHODS: A 12-member national expert panel was selected to represent practice in different regions of Canada. Potential quality indicators were identified by a detailed search of published guidelines, randomized trials and outcomes studies. A two-step modified Delphi process was employed with an initial screening round of indicator ratings, followed by a national quality indicator panel meeting, and follow-up discussions to obtain consensus.
RESULTS: A total of 26 indicators including six structure indicators, nine process indicators, and 11 outcomes indicators were identified by the national expert panel to be representative of high quality of care for PCI. Pharmacological indicators included prescription of acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel and statin therapy as adjunctive therapy for PCI. Nonpharmacological process indicators included minimal procedure volumes, door-to-balloon time in primary PCI, prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy and selected patient education counselling instructions. Outcome indicators included death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and vascular access complications after PCI.
CONCLUSIONS: A new set of PCI quality indicators for use in the Canadian health care system was developed. The widespread adoption and implementation of PCI quality indicators in clinical practice will facilitate the identification of practice gaps to enable quality improvement efforts and to optimize the outcomes of patients undergoing PCI throughout Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19052669      PMCID: PMC2643231          DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(08)70696-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  22 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  In-hospital outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in Canada: 1992/93 to 2000/01.

Authors:  Shelina M Jamal; Fiona M Shrive; William A Ghali; Merrill L Knudtson; Mark J Eisenberg
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies.

Authors:  R H Brook; M R Chassin; A Fink; D H Solomon; J Kosecoff; R E Park
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Proliferation of cardiac technology in Canada: a challenge to the sustainability of Medicare.

Authors:  David A Alter; Therese A Stukel; Alice Newman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Eliciting expert opinion using the Delphi technique: identifying performance indicators for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  S L Normand; B J McNeil; L E Peterson; R H Palmer
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.038

6.  Relationship between physician and hospital coronary angioplasty volume and outcome in elderly patients.

Authors:  J G Jollis; E D Peterson; C L Nelson; J A Stafford; E R DeLong; L H Muhlbaier; D B Mark
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-06-03       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Coronary angioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists.

Authors:  E L Hannan; M Racz; T J Ryan; B D McCallister; L W Johnson; D T Arani; A D Guerci; J Sosa; E J Topol
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction; A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of patients with acute myocardial infarction).

Authors:  Elliott M. Antman; Daniel T. Anbe; Paul Wayne Armstrong; Eric R. Bates; Lee A. Green; Mary Hand; Judith S. Hochman; Harlan M. Krumholz; Frederick G. Kushner; Gervasio A. Lamas; Charles J. Mullany; Joseph P. Ornato; David L. Pearle; Michael A. Sloan; Sidney C. Smith; Joseph S. Alpert; Jeffrey L. Anderson; David P. Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Raymond J. Gibbons; Gabriel Gregoratos; Jonathan L. Halperin; Loren F. Hiratzka; Sharon Ann Hunt; Alice K. Jacobs; Joseph P. Ornato
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--2002: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina).

Authors:  Eugene Braunwald; Elliott M Antman; John W Beasley; Robert M Califf; Melvin D Cheitlin; Judith S Hochman; Robert H Jones; Dean Kereiakes; Joel Kupersmith; Thomas N Levin; Carl J Pepine; John W Schaeffer; Earl E Smith; David E Steward; Pierre Theroux; Raymond J Gibbons; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Loren F Hiratzka; Alice K Jacobs; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Race and gender disparities in rates of cardiac revascularization: do they reflect appropriate use of procedures or problems in quality of care?

Authors:  Arnold M Epstein; Joel S Weissman; Eric C Schneider; Constantine Gatsonis; Lucian L Leape; Robert N Piana
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  9 in total

1.  Building quality indicators to improve care for adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Michelle Gurvitz; Ariane Marelli; Rita Mangione-Smith; Kathy Jenkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Quality measures for medication continuity in long-term care facilities, using a structured panel process.

Authors:  Chaim M Bell; Stacey S Brener; Rebecca Comrie; Geoffrey M Anderson; Susan E Bronskill
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Classifying orofacial pains: a new proposal of taxonomy based on ontology.

Authors:  D R Nixdorf; M T Drangsholt; D A Ettlin; C Gaul; R De Leeuw; P Svensson; J M Zakrzewska; A De Laat; W Ceusters
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.837

4.  Adherence to process of care quality indicators after percutaneous coronary intervention in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Andrew Czarnecki; Treesa J Prasad; Julie Wang; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Asim N Cheema; Vladimír Dz̆avík; Madhu K Natarajan; Chris S Simpson; Derek Y So; Jaffer Syed; Jack V Tu; Dennis T Ko
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-02-14

5.  Evaluation of a regional ST-elevation myocardial infarction primary percutaneous coronary intervention program at the Rouge Valley Health System.

Authors:  Pria M D Nippak; Jodie Pritchard; Robin Horodyski; Candace J Ikeda-Douglas; Winston W Isaac
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  The relationship between procedural volume and patient outcomes for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patricia Harrington; Máirín Ryan; Kieran A Walsh; Thomas Plunkett; Kirsty K O'Brien; Conor Teljeur; Susan M Smith
Journal:  HRB Open Res       Date:  2021-01-28

7.  Development of Acute Myocardial Infarction Mortality and Readmission Models for Public Reporting on Hospital Performance in Canada.

Authors:  Dennis T Ko; Tareq Ahmed; Peter C Austin; Warren J Cantor; Paul Dorian; Michael Goldfarb; Yanyan Gong; Michelle M Graham; Jing Gu; Nathaniel M Hawkins; Thao Huynh; Karin H Humphries; Maria Koh; Yoan Lamarche; Laurie J Lambert; Patrick R Lawler; Jean-Francois Légaré; Hung Q Ly; Feng Qiu; Ata Ur Rehman Quraishi; Derek Y So; Robert C Welsh; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Graham Wong; Andrew T Yan; Yana Gurevich
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2021-05-01

8.  Development of quality of care indicators from systematic reviews: the case of hospital delivery.

Authors:  Xavier Bonfill; Marta Roqué; Marta Beatriz Aller; Dimelza Osorio; Carles Foradada; Angels Vives; David Rigau
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Quality indicators for responsible use of medicines: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kenji Fujita; Rebekah J Moles; Timothy F Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.