Literature DB >> 14583687

Race and gender disparities in rates of cardiac revascularization: do they reflect appropriate use of procedures or problems in quality of care?

Arnold M Epstein1, Joel S Weissman, Eric C Schneider, Constantine Gatsonis, Lucian L Leape, Robert N Piana.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have documented substantial differences by race and gender in the use of coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary angioplasty. However, few studies have examined whether these differences reflect problems in quality of care.
METHOD: We selected a random sample stratified by gender, race, and income of 5026 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 to 75 who underwent inpatient coronary angiography during 1991 to 1992 in 1 of 5 states. We compared the frequency of 2 problems in quality by race and gender: underuse or the failure to receive a clinically indicated revascularization procedure and receipt of revascularization when it was not clinically indicated. We used 2 independent sets of criteria developed by the RAND Corporation and the American College of Cardiology/American Hospital Association (ACC/AHA). We also examined survival of the cohort through March 31, 1994.
RESULTS: Revascularization procedures were clinically indicated more frequently among whites than blacks and among men than women. Failure to receive revascularization when it was indicated was more common among blacks than among whites (40% vs. 23-24%, depending on the criteria, both P<0.001) but similar among men and women (25% vs. 22-24%, P>0.05). Racial disparities remained similar after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. Among patients rated inappropriate, use of procedures was greater for whites than blacks using RAND criteria (10.5% vs. 5.8%, P<0.01) and greater for men than for women (14.2% vs. 5.3% by RAND criteria, P=0.001; 8.2% vs. 4.0%% by ACC/AHA criteria, P=0.04). After multivariate adjustment, the disparities for race and gender remained similar and were statistically significant using RAND criteria. Mortality rates tended to validate our appropriateness criteria for underuse.
CONCLUSIONS: Racial differences in procedure use reflect higher rates of clinical appropriateness among whites, greater underuse among blacks, and more frequent revascularization when it was not clinically indicated among whites. Underuse is associated with higher mortality. In contrast, men had higher rates of clinical appropriateness and were more likely to receive revascularization when it was not clinically indicated. There was no evidence of greater underuse among women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14583687     DOI: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000093423.38746.8C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  43 in total

Review 1.  Race/Ethnicity and overuse of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy R Kressin; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Commentary--anatomy of racial disparity in influenza vaccination.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Temporal trends in the utilization of diagnostic testing and treatments for cardiovascular disease in the United States, 1993-2001.

Authors:  F L Lucas; Michael A DeLorenzo; Andrea E Siewers; David E Wennberg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Cardiovascular health disparities: a systematic review of health care interventions.

Authors:  Andrew M Davis; Lisa M Vinci; Tochi M Okwuosa; Ayana R Chase; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  Analyzing whether countries are equally efficient at improving longevity for men and women.

Authors:  Douglas Barthold; Arijit Nandi; José M Mendoza Rodríguez; Jody Heymann
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Sex and racial differences in the management of acute myocardial infarction, 1994 through 2002.

Authors:  Viola Vaccarino; Saif S Rathore; Nanette K Wenger; Paul D Frederick; Jerome L Abramson; Hal V Barron; Ajay Manhapra; Susmita Mallik; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Explaining black-white differences in receipt of recommended colon cancer treatment.

Authors:  Laura-Mae Baldwin; Sharon A Dobie; Kevin Billingsley; Yong Cai; George E Wright; Jason A Dominitz; William Barlow; Joan L Warren; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Perspectives of Orthopedic Surgeons on Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Care.

Authors:  Muyibat A Adelani; Mary I O'Connor
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-08-29

9.  Geographic Access to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Centers in the United States: Insights From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.

Authors:  Guillaume Marquis-Gravel; Amanda Stebbins; Andrzej S Kosinski; Morgan L Cox; J Kevin Harrison; G Chad Hughes; Vinod H Thourani; Thomas G Gleason; Ajay J Kirtane; John D Carroll; Michael J Mack; Sreekanth Vemulapalli
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 14.676

10.  Racial, socioeconomic, and rural-urban disparities in obesity-related bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Amy E Wallace; Yinong Young-Xu; David Hartley; William B Weeks
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.