Literature DB >> 9184578

Relationship between physician and hospital coronary angioplasty volume and outcome in elderly patients.

J G Jollis1, E D Peterson, C L Nelson, J A Stafford, E R DeLong, L H Muhlbaier, D B Mark.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the expectation that physicians who perform larger numbers of coronary angioplasty procedures will have better outcomes, the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association guidelines recommend minimum physician volumes of 75 procedures per year. However, there is little empirical data to support this recommendation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We examined in-hospital bypass surgery and death after angioplasty according to 1992 physician and hospital Medicare procedure volume. In 1992, 6115 physicians performed angioplasty on 97,478 Medicare patients at 984 hospitals. The median numbers of procedures performed per physician and per hospital were 13 (interquartile range, 5 to 25) and 98 (interquartile range, 40 to 181), respectively. With the assumption that Medicare patients composed one half to one third of all patients undergoing angioplasty, these median values are consistent with an overall physician volume of 26 to 39 cases per year and an overall hospital volume of 196 to 294 cases per year. After adjusting for age, sex, race, acute myocardial infarction, and comorbidity, low-volume physicians were associated with higher rates of bypass surgery (P < .001) and low-volume hospitals were associated with higher rates of bypass surgery and death (P < .001). Improving outcomes were seen up to threshold values of 75 Medicare cases per physician and 200 Medicare cases per hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: More than 50% of physicians and 25% of hospitals performing coronary angioplasty in 1992 were unlikely to have met the minimum volume guidelines first published in 1988, and these patients had worse outcomes. While more recent data are required to determine whether the same relationships persist after the introduction of newer technologies, this study suggests that adherence to minimum volume standards by physicians and hospitals will lead to better outcomes for elderly patients undergoing coronary angioplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9184578     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.95.11.2485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  23 in total

1.  Coronary angioplasty: guidelines for good practice and training. Joint Working Group on Coronary Angioplasty of the British Cardiac Society and British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.

Authors: 
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  [Position document on quality assurance in invasive cardiology. Are minimum numbers in percutaneous coronary angioplasty evidence based?].

Authors:  A Vogt; Ruth H Strasser
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2004-10

Review 3.  [Acute myocardial infarction: acute coronary intervention at any hospital versus acute coronary intervention at specialized centers only].

Authors:  Ralf Zahn; Uwe Zeymer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Volume-outcome relationship in revision hip replacement - Results from a low volume hospital.

Authors:  Fahim Anwar; Kalpesh Shah; Ian McLean
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2013-08-12

5.  Laryngeal recurrent nerve injury in surgery for benign thyroid diseases: effect of nerve dissection and impact of individual surgeon in more than 27,000 nerves at risk.

Authors:  Michael Hermann; Gunter Alk; Rudolf Roka; Karl Glaser; Michael Freissmuth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Relationship Between Procedural Volume and Outcomes.

Authors:  Apurva O Badheka; Sidakpal S Panaich; Shilpkumar Arora; Nilay Patel; Nileshkumar J Patel; Chirag Savani; Abhishek Deshmukh; Mauricio G Cohen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Hospital volume and surgical outcomes after elective hip/knee arthroplasty: a risk-adjusted analysis of a large regional database.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; C Kent Kwoh; Robert M Boudreau; Gwo-Chin Lee; Said A Ibrahim
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-08

8.  Effect of center catheterization volume on risk of catastrophic adverse event after cardiac catheterization in children.

Authors:  Michael L O'Byrne; Andrew C Glatz; Russell T Shinohara; Natalie Jayaram; Matthew J Gillespie; Yoav Dori; Jonathan J Rome; Steven Kawut
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Canadian quality indicators for percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Dennis T Ko; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Xiaofu Zhu; Janice Richards; Jack V Tu
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.223

10.  Hospital percutaneous coronary intervention volume and patient mortality, 1998 to 2000: does the evidence support current procedure volume minimums?

Authors:  Andrew J Epstein; Saif S Rathore; Kevin G M Volpp; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.